Smoking in public places should be banned because it endangers the health of both smokers and non-smokers. Secondhand smoke, the smoke exhaled by a smoker or produced by a burning cigarette, can cause serious health problems for people who inhale it, even if they are not smokers themselves. Non-smokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk of lung cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Children are especially vulnerable to the harmful effects of secondhand smoke, as their bodies are still developing and they have a higher breathing rate than adults.
In addition to the health risks posed by secondhand smoke, smoking in public places is a nuisance to non-smokers who are forced to breathe in the smoke. It is unfair to subject non-smoking individuals to the harmful effects of smoking just because they happen to be in the same place as a smoker. Non-smokers should not have to choose between their health and the ability to go to a restaurant, movie theater, or other public place.
Another argument against smoking in public places is that it promotes a negative image of the behavior. Smoking is increasingly being seen as a dirty, unhealthy habit that is out of step with modern values. Allowing smoking in public places sends the message that it is acceptable and even encouraged, which is not the case. It is important to discourage smoking in order to protect the health of both individuals and society as a whole.
There are also economic arguments against smoking in public places. The cost of cleaning up the litter left behind by cigarettes, such as cigarette butts and packs, can be significant. In addition, the healthcare costs associated with smoking-related diseases are a burden on society. By banning smoking in public places, governments can reduce the amount of money spent on these costs and redirect it towards more productive uses.
In conclusion, smoking in public places should be banned because it poses serious health risks to both smokers and non-smokers, is a nuisance to non-smokers, promotes a negative image of smoking, and has economic costs. By banning smoking in public places, governments can protect the health and well-being of their citizens and create a more pleasant environment for all.
Argumentative Essay: Why Public Smoking Should Be Banned...
Another 16 million live with a serious illness caused by smoking. Effects of public smoking are adverse and therefore it should be discouraged using all available avenues like media, churches and important of all is the available legislative means by banning public smoking. This has in turn made such addicts impoverished with their craving for the drugs. Since advertising can be so powerful for readers, the banning on advertising can also be powerful to prevent tobacco use. Jinot, Jennifer, and Steven P. Furthermore, the children in that family can follow their parents to smoke the cigarette when they grow up.
Argumentative Essay On Smoking In Public Places
This is akin to robbing the non-smokers of a healthy and safe environment and hence there should absolutely be no second thoughts about banning smoking in public. Socially, smoking in public places could encourage innocent non-smokers like children and youths to get into the vice. Furthermore, smoke-free legislation is proven to be beneficial to current smokers, as it has helped them to reduce the annual tobacco consumption, if not completely stop smoking WHO 38. On the other hand, people claim economies are negatively affected by banning smoking in public areas, where most people spend practically all their day. Also, with the illegalization of tobacco, smoking triggers such as peer pressure would reduce temptation, social smoking would lessen significantly as the accessibility would be restricted and public view would deem tobacco as the severe danger it truly… Solution Essay On Smoking In addition, places that remind the smoker to smoke should be avoid, such as friends who smoke, smoking areas, or if being alone triggers smoking, then avoid it as much as possible.
Argumentative Essay On Effects Of Public Smoking
Marine life like fish absorbs the toxins resulting into their deaths. These parts which the method uses are; the data which provides evidence, claim which is what is being proved with the data, and warrant which is the general assumption that links data to the claim. The essay should not consider only one side of the debate, as this is a major clash between millions of people and governments worldwide. Other countries are taking the same step and are putting smoking bans in place. Public smoking ban legislation decreases the rate at which current smokers smoke and in addition decreases exposure of the public to effects of public smoking. What is even more encouraging is the fact that 80% of smokers also agree that the law is actually good and almost a full 100% , both smokers and non-smokers, think that workplaces are healthier now, WHO 112. Prohibiting smoking in open places would decrease the amount of people that smoke each year and inspire individuals to smoke not as much of.
Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay
Secondhand smoke, medical costs, health problems, and even death that stems from public smoking is just the beginning of why public smoking should be banned completely. All those substances are not suitable for people to consume. The responsible stakeholders should put into consideration the effects of second hand smoke on non-smokers and completely ban smoking in public places. Patrick and Juliette point out that, ban on smoking would result in the perverse unintended effects that are harmful to both the health of non smokers and the economy. On the other hand, Dr. Critical thinking and communication: the use of reason in argument 6 th Ed. Model Answer Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons.
Smoking Argumentative Essay Examples That Really Inspire
Even a person who inhales second hand smoke without consent is in harm of dangerous diseases and cancers. Reference List Damer, T. Those supporting the ban have used the fallacy of false cause as witnessed in the argument that smoking has an impact of environmental pollution. The reason why smoking cigarettes are so hard to stop is because the substance contains nicotine, which is very addictive. In addition, you must back up legal arguments using the legal framework in existence in good detail. All the ingredients left could use to produce many useful things such as lighters fluid, batteries, or candles for people to use it when they need.
Cigarette Smoking Should Be Banned Argumentative Essay
Contrast The two arguments seem to pull in two opposite directions with no common ground being decided upon. It is not enough saying that a small fraction is affected from second hand smoking yet is a quite diverse problem ranging from employers, employees, personal businesses, airlines, entertainment and recreation areas e. Are Public Smoking Bans Necessary? Magical realism is similar to or perhaps the same as fantasy and science fiction because the reader is asked to do the same thing; that is accept fantasy as reality. The effect of not having as many smokers would, of course, be that a much smaller amount of people would become victim to secondhand smoke. The air is cleaner too. On the other hand, prohibiting smoking in public places gives non-smokers the right to have clean air without having to suffer passive-smoking-related health problems. To get started, submit your instructions.
