Plastic surgery is a controversial topic that has garnered much attention in recent years. On one hand, some argue that plastic surgery is a legitimate way for individuals to improve their appearance and boost their self-esteem. On the other hand, others argue that plastic surgery is a superficial and unhealthy way to try to fix one's appearance, and that it can lead to dangerous and even deadly complications.
One argument in favor of plastic surgery is that it can help individuals who have physical deformities or scars from accidents or injuries to feel more confident and comfortable in their own skin. For example, reconstructive surgery can be used to repair facial or bodily abnormalities caused by birth defects, trauma, or disease. This type of surgery can be life-changing for individuals who have been self-conscious about their appearance and may have struggled with social interactions and self-esteem as a result.
Another argument in favor of plastic surgery is that it can help people to look and feel younger. As we age, our skin and bodies naturally begin to sag and wrinkle, and some people may feel self-conscious about these changes. Plastic surgery procedures such as facelifts, brow lifts, and neck lifts can help to tighten and lift the skin, giving the appearance of a more youthful appearance. Similarly, procedures such as breast augmentation or reduction can help individuals to feel more comfortable and confident in their bodies.
However, there are also valid arguments against plastic surgery. One concern is that plastic surgery can be unhealthy and even dangerous. Complications from plastic surgery procedures can include infection, scarring, and even death. In addition, some people may become addicted to plastic surgery, constantly seeking out new procedures in an attempt to achieve an unattainable standard of beauty. This can lead to financial ruin and can even have negative impacts on mental health.
Another argument against plastic surgery is that it reinforces harmful societal beauty standards that prioritize appearance over substance. Many people feel pressure to conform to certain beauty standards, and plastic surgery can be seen as a way to achieve these standards. This can lead to a focus on superficial characteristics rather than inner qualities such as kindness, intelligence, and compassion.
In conclusion, plastic surgery is a complex and controversial topic that has both proponents and opponents. While it can be helpful for individuals with physical deformities or who want to reverse the signs of aging, it also carries risks and can reinforce harmful societal beauty standards. It is important for individuals to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of plastic surgery before making a decision.
Reasons why they should ban smoking in public places Free Essays
The answer from a smoker is: Yes! But, why should cigarette smoking be banned in all public spaces, including outside public establishments? How do smokers live to 100 when they have smoked 85 years plus? On the other hand, those who oppose the idea of banning smoking in public places are of the opinion that their freedom of choice, a human right will be infringed, business people claim the ban will destroy their revenue generation, staff members who are smokers say that it will lower or destroy their morale hence poor productivity in the working place and that the studies carried out are inconclusive and have not without doubt depicted the effect of smoking to passive smokers. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development. The negative effects of smoking are not just limited to the places mentioned in the 2011 law, so smoking in all public places should be banned. This is very dangerous. Is this a noble deed or a true act of discrimination? So, is it better to allow or ban smoking in public places? Sorry if it didnt make sense, but i think u will get the points that i was trying to make. Why should this be so? They may work with people who are allergic to smoking, for examples. Does one really always have to go out and have a smoke? Nicotine reaches the brain within seconds after taking a puff and its effects wear off within a few minutes.
5 reasons to ban smoking in public places
A healthy society means that all will be reproductive hence low rate of unemployment and reduced dependency ratio. Here is a small list of the cancers created from smoking; lung, larynx, mouth, throat, stomach, pancreas, kidney, bladder, and cervix. For instance, there are professionals such as teachers, technicians who cannot carry out their tasks, duties and responsibilities comfortably and to perfection without smoking. The smoker may link smoking with social activities and many other activities, too. Fortunately, when people follow smoking bans, there would be fewer cigarette butts and the environment can become cleaner and healthier. The second reason that smoking in public should be banned is that many people who do not smoke do not like the disgusting odor that comes from cigarette smoke. In conclusion, smoking in public should be banned due to the health risks that can be caused to non-smokers, non-smokers find the smell of cigarette smoke to be offensive and may cause relapse in past smokers, and cigarette smoke and the materials used to make cigarettes cause permanent, irreversible damage to the earth, environment, and to our whole planet.
Why Smoking Should Be Banned in Public
Which do you think has more pros and cons? Opponents call it unnecessary and say it infringes on the rights of business and property owners Premium Smoking ban Smoking Kentucky Smoking Ban in Public Places one should have to choose between their health and a good job; law that prohibit smoking in public places help create a healthy environment for all people. At some point, the person uses tobacco, the unpleasant feelings go away, and the cycle continues. Smokers only make up approximately 26% of the U. A and other parts of the world is the idea of human freedom as smokers will be claimed their freedom has been taken away, while on the other hand non-smokers will argue that the freedom to have healthy lives have been denied if banning is not implemented Ifsud, 3. If it will be banned, then the individuals to be affected by cancer will significantly be cut down hence saving huge amount of money in treating smoke-related illnesses. In my own opinion, due to the weight drawn behind the arguments in favor of banning smoking in public such as risks of getting cancer and the large number of death coupled with the need to have a clean and safer environment I would strongly advocate for the ban to be imposed to sate millions of dollars and people. People who have smoked for a significant period of time will have noticeable problems breathing and will most likely be in poor health.
