Capital punishment scholarly articles. Capital Punishment: A Hazard to a Sustainable Criminal Justice System? 2022-10-29
Capital punishment scholarly articles Rating:
9,8/10
402
reviews
Leadership is a multifaceted concept that has the power to inspire and guide individuals and groups towards a common goal. To me, leadership means the ability to influence and guide others towards a vision or objective, while also being able to listen, adapt, and inspire others to achieve their best.
Effective leadership requires a range of skills, including the ability to communicate clearly and effectively, to listen actively and empathetically, and to problem-solve and make decisions in a timely and thoughtful manner. It also requires the ability to motivate and inspire others, to foster collaboration and teamwork, and to lead by example.
A true leader is someone who is able to inspire and empower others to reach their full potential, while also being humble and open to learning from those around them. They are able to create a positive and inclusive culture that promotes growth, innovation, and success.
To me, leadership also means being authentic and true to oneself, as well as being transparent and accountable for one's actions. It means taking ownership of one's mistakes and learning from them, rather than seeking to blame others or make excuses.
In addition, leadership involves being able to adapt to changing circumstances and being open to new ideas and perspectives. A leader who is able to embrace change and encourage others to do the same is one who is able to lead their team or organization towards long-term success.
Overall, leadership means being able to inspire, guide, and empower others to achieve their goals and reach their full potential, while also being authentic, accountable, and adaptable. It is a journey that requires continuous learning and growth, and one that can have a profound impact on the lives of others.
Scholarly Articles on the Death Penalty: History & Journal Articles
None other than the principle of equality…. Court of Appeals observed, there is "substantial and uncontroverted evidence… that execution by lethal injection poses a serious risk of cruel, protracted death…. Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake. Given a society with reasonably just rules of cooperation that bestow benefits and burdens on its members, misconduct takes unfair advantage of others, and punishment is thereby merited to address the advantage gained: A person who violates the rules has something that others have—the benefits of the system—but by renouncing what others have assumed, the burdens of self-restraint, he has acquired an unfair advantage. If the drop is too long, the head will be torn off. We did not consider that horrific possibility. As with recent deterrence studies, there is no clear empirical evidence of any brutalizing or civilizing effects of capital punishment.
Ethics of Capital Punishment. A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and Its Consequences , by Matthew H. Kramer
Not only may this not be practical, such discretion in sentencing risks caprice or arbitrariness in punishing offenders by death or in other ways see section 5 ; and it challenges the fundamental, formal principle of justice, that is, that like case be treated alike. His head continued to snap back. Others maintain that, analogous to relieving the suffering of a torture victim so that they can be further tortured, physicians ought not participate in executions in order to reduce the suffering of the condemned Dworkin. McCleskey's attorney cited a 1983 study, commonly referred to as the Baldus study, which determined that African Americans in Georgia were 4. The idea here is that an execution is a single, severe event, perhaps not long remembered by others, whereas life imprisonment provides a continuing reminder of the punishment for misconduct. For instance in Rome capital punishment was given by drowning the offender or by crucifixion. With no legal ability to impose a punishment other than execution, some juries chose to hand down verdicts of not guilty, a trial outcome known as jury nullification.
Furthermore, it may matter morally what are the grounds of selecting only some convicted killers to receive death sentences or to be executed. A recent proponent of a contractarian theory of punishment, for example, argues that individuals would consent to an institution only if it would leave individuals better off than they would be in its absence. A classic expression of retributivism about capital punishment can be found in a late 18th century treatise by Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysical Elements of Justice 99-107; Ak. Capital punishment many times do not show its effect on the rates of violent crime. These decisions allowed the reinstatement of state death penalty laws.
Beccaria adds to this thinking at least two claims about some bad social effects of capital punishment: first, for many the death penalty becomes a spectacle, and for some it evokes pity for the offender rather than the fear of execution needed for effective deterrence of criminal misconduct 49; Ch. Org, Should the death penalty be allowed? An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. For cases of drug trafficking, 30 countries have made it a capital offence. Are there not some offenders who will not be open to moral education, to hearing the message expressed through their penal experiences? For example, In 1978 — two years after the Supreme Court issued its decision reversing a previous ban on the death penalty Gregg v. Considerations of perhaps unintended discriminatory outcomes, however, need not support abolition of the death penalty. Approximately two minutes later, we were told by a prison official that the execution was complete.
Why or why not? In his concurrent opinion in the 2006 Supreme Court case Kansas v. Pepper University of Virginia focus on the third challenge. Kramer Mind Oxford Academic We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. A utilitarian approach to capital punishment is inherently comparative in this way: it is essentially tied to the consequences of the practice being best for the total happiness of the society. First, unlike other constitutionally permissible modes of execution in America that is, electrocution, hanging, firing squad, gas inhalation , a lethal injection requires medical expertise in order to be administered properly. Although the number of executions worldwide varies on yearly basis countries like Belarus, Congo, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Singapore have the use of capital punishment on a regular basis.
Scores of these individuals were sentenced to death. Among major European philosophers, specific or systematic attention to the death penalty is the exception until about 400 years ago. How many people are unjustly facing the death penalty? By definition, it is difficult to obtain a reliable answer to this question. He was shuddering uncontrollably and his body was racked with spasms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Whether due to inherent vagaries of legal language, the necessity of discretion to judge properly complex, particular cases, the fallibility of human beings, or political pressures and other factors affecting decisions made within the system, such as clemency, the risk of error is not eliminable for the institution of capital punishment. The implications of punishment as communication aimed at the offender would require radical revisions of current penal practices, as some proponents readily admit.
At retrial, she was acquitted when a neighbor corroborated Butler's explanation of the child's cause of death and the physician who performed the autopsy admitted his work had not been thorough. Or if the actual execution of capital punishment requires unethical conduct by medical practitioners or other necessary participants? And to the extent that such satisfactions are sufficient justification, then the defense is no longer retributivist, but utilitarian or consequentialist see sections 3 and 4. The challenge is that retributivists ignore or diminish their importance, perhaps defending or opposing the death penalty despite such effects and not because of them. Moral Theory and Capital Punishment. In 2021, South Carolina became the first state to depart from using lethal injection as a primary execution method. It lasted thirty seconds.
Some believe that when it comes to death-penalty cases, this is not a huge cause for concern. When the switch is thrown the body strains, jolting as the voltage is raised and lowered. For example, the approach presupposes some moral merit to popular sentiments of indignation, outrage, anger, condemnation, even vengeance or vindictiveness in response to serious misconduct. In 1989, the General Assembly adopted the Second Optional Protocol to the Although the Second Protocol to the ICCPR is the only worldwide instrument calling for death penalty abolition, there are three such instruments with regional emphases. In 2002, the Council adopted the Thirteenth Protocol to the ECHR, which provides for the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances, including times of war or imminent threat of war. Aside from the moral import of arbitrariness as selectivity, there is also an arbitrariness that issues in mistakes, where persons who did not commit a capital crime or perhaps did not commit any crime at all are wrongly convicted, sentenced and executed.
