Pro racial profiling articles. Racial Profiling 2022-10-18
Pro racial profiling articles Rating:
It is important to note that racial profiling, which refers to the practice of disproportionately targeting individuals for suspicion or investigation based on their race or ethnicity, is a controversial and divisive issue. While some argue that racial profiling is necessary for public safety and crime prevention, others believe that it is inherently discriminatory and violates the principle of equal treatment under the law. In this essay, I will examine some of the arguments made in favor of racial profiling and consider their validity.
One argument often made in favor of racial profiling is that it can be an effective tool for law enforcement. Proponents of this view argue that, by targeting certain racial or ethnic groups for investigation, law enforcement can more effectively identify and apprehend criminals. They point to the fact that certain crimes are more prevalent in certain communities and argue that it makes sense to focus efforts on those areas.
However, there is little evidence to suggest that racial profiling is actually an effective means of crime prevention. Studies have shown that racial profiling is not a reliable indicator of criminal behavior and that it can actually hinder law enforcement efforts by alienating community members and undermining trust in the police. Furthermore, racial profiling can result in the disproportionate targeting and harassment of innocent individuals, which can have serious negative consequences on their lives and well-being.
Another argument made in favor of racial profiling is that it can help to prevent terrorism. This argument is often used to justify the use of racial profiling by airport security and other government agencies. However, the effectiveness of racial profiling as a counter-terrorism measure is also highly questionable. There is no evidence to suggest that racial profiling is an effective means of identifying terrorists, and it can actually create a false sense of security by diverting resources and attention away from more effective methods of detecting and preventing terrorist attacks.
In addition to being ineffective, racial profiling is also deeply discriminatory and violates basic principles of justice and equality. It is based on the assumption that individuals of certain races or ethnicities are more likely to be criminals or terrorists, which is simply not true. Racial profiling perpetuates harmful stereotypes and reinforces systemic racism, and it can have serious negative consequences for those targeted, including discrimination, harassment, and even physical harm.
In conclusion, while some may argue that racial profiling is necessary for public safety and crime prevention, the evidence suggests otherwise. Racial profiling is ineffective, discriminatory, and violates fundamental principles of justice and equality. Instead of relying on racial profiling, law enforcement should focus on evidence-based, community-oriented approaches that respect the rights and dignity of all individuals.
Claimants must demonstrate that the same individuals were not prosecuted in the same way as them in order to be successful. Racial profiling can make everyone feel unsafe because it creates division. Reasonable In spite of the anomalies, most of the organizations of terrorists that threaten the nation today are based on an Islamic form of ideology that is primary prevalent in Southeast Asia and Middle East. Three officers were tried for involuntary manslaughter: John Vojtas was acquitted; Lt. The mindset behind this idea is that most Hispanic residents are illegal and do not possess a valid drivers license, which while can be seen as racial profiling, is a matter of fact and was proved by the checkpoints. Dogs were trained to attack and bite suspects regardless of their actions, even against alleged shoplifters, gasoline siphoners and jaywalkers. The review of the case of the law highlights the element of racial profiling, but there are many barriers to prevent its realization.
However, a judge cleared them of all charges, stating that they were doing their jobs and were within jurisdiction Revolutionary Worker, 2000. According to the The Court in Lyons v LAPD determined that the plaintiff had standing to file a damages claim but was unable to obtain an injunction to stop future police abuse. Canadian political parties have their immigration law and policies which they implement whenever they came in power. Pros of Racial Profiling 1. Since the September 11th attacks, the term racial profiling has found its way across the lips of many Americans.
Black and Latino pedestrians are regularly stopped and frisked without reasonable cause. Pauline Hampton and her niece, both African-Americans, were shopping at the Dillard Department Store in Overland Park, Kansas , a suburb of Kansas City, with their children. After finding the receipt for the items, he shoved the goods and the empty bag back to her. You can read more of his work on his site, The Cynical Ones. There is no denying that racial profiling can be very discriminatory and this is why it is easy to see that it might not really be that beneficial at all.
List of Cons of Racial Profiling 1. In some specific cases, the lack of case law is witnessed like child welfare. Police And Racial Profiling 352 Words 2 Pages Profiling, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is the act or process of extrapolating information about a person based on known traits or tendencies. The company, based in Arkansas, has also been the subject of dozens of racial profiling lawsuits. There is no getting around this fact. Although an accurate profile can save money, an inaccurate profile can be quite costly. It can make an entire community feel unsafe.
Knowing what type of person fits the profile of the criminal they are looking for can save resources. This only means that his screening tests must be much stricter. It is illegal under 42 USC Section 1983 to use racial profiling to discriminate against a person on the basis of race. All people are entitled to the protection of the Fourth Amendment against An individual is racially profiled when he or she is stopped by the police or detained as a result of their race or ethnicity. When people are subjected to racial profiling based on assumptions and characteristics, they are considered unfairly treated.
Racial profiling is all about the stereotyped perspective of indigenous people. Finally, the whole academic discussion of racial profiling in this context seems determined to avoid any use of common sense. This assumption in turn must be based on some notion of group rights, which sits uncomfortably if at all in our individual rights tradition. Another is that it is ineffective, because it does not target the root causes of crime. If a claim fails to meet this requirement, a claimant can choose to identify an individual who was not investigated in the same manner or to present evidence of his or her case. Some benefits social media and texting have are that it can spread important news quickly, people can make new friends, and it can increase businesses. Some courts have disagreed and refused to follow the Armstrong precedent in determining whether law enforcement officers can engage in racial profiling based on their location.
However, the problem of racism is a general societal problem which filters through laws and administration. What causes the loss of personal freedom is what results from the added scrutiny entailed by racial profiling. America and its goal of an equal society can come one step closer once racial profiling and racial bias is eliminated. Or to put that another way, I find them both remarkably perceptive, and hence all the more fascinating that they both come, so reasonably, to opposite conclusions. Although police claimed that Gammage initiated the struggle, a tow truck driver said he saw one officer start the fight and the others join in kicking, hitting and clubbing Gammage while he lay on the pavement. News Release The RAND Corporation and the University of Pittsburgh will study residents of two predominantly Black neighborhoods in Pittsburgh to examine how exposure to the legacies of structural racism at the neighborhood and individual levels may contribute to the risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia in African Americans. Demonstrations were held almost daily, along with the arrests of over 1,200 people in planned civil disobedience.
Conclusion The debate on the legality of racial profiling and the effects it has on the people who have experienced it one way or the other will still go a long way. For a similar one, I recommend the too-numerous-to-link exchanges early last summer I had over disparate impact with Garret Moritz of gTexts. In 1998, the Department of Justice DOJ filed a lawsuit against the New Jersey State Police, claiming racial profiling. There is not a student alive who can claim that his or her admission to a particular university is necessary to remedy past discrimination. RAND studies have shown the effects of ethnic and racial discrimination on health care utilization, children's mental health, job markets, and sports, as well as in police departments, where racial profiling prevention training is now common. Primarily, teenagers are more open to be cyberbullied and… The Cons Of Racial Profiling Their mindset often centers on isolationist and slightly cynical values due to their love-hate relationship with the general public.
While the operation has a sound purpose, locations of the checkpoints were chosen to target the Hispanic community. Everything people do all around the world is shared socially online with one another. Every city has its own issues dealing with criminal activities and officers respond to crime reported by individuals in certain areas more than others due to the …show more content… Racial profiling is a racist tactic of people, not just by Causes And Disadvantages Of Internet Addiction Social media, podcasting and online role-playing games have become a part of our life because Internet nowadays can easily access. . One is that it is a way to target potential criminals. Can it really serve its purpose? Also, white people suffer from racial profiling when they are in a relationship with a person belonging to one of the communities. Amazingly, Paul and therefore God said, "This testimony is true" Titus 1:13.
They mean discrimination prior to the introduction of data-- When we allow or encourage law enforcement agencies to practice racial profiling, we are ourselves practicing vicarious racial discrimination. Racial profiling does not refer to the act of a law enforcement agent pursuing a suspect in which the specific description of the suspect includes race or ethnicity in combination with other identifying factors. Whites turned on the African Americans, after the use of slavery, they went full on offensive. The case of Amadou Diallo, an unarmed African immigrant who was killed in a hail of 41 bullets by the NYPD for attempting to show officers his driver's license, is only one case among many. Racial profiling can lead to other types of profiling. Racial profiling can become a problem one day, maybe be a threat to anyone moving to a new place. Maher for his thoughtful comment.