The concept of tradition is deeply ingrained in human societies, as it serves as a way to connect people to their cultural and societal roots. It is the marrow of tradition that helps to shape the way we view the world and our place in it, influencing our values, beliefs, and behaviors.
Traditions can take many forms, from the way we celebrate holidays and rituals to the customs and practices that are passed down from generation to generation. They can be small, personal traditions within a family, or they can be larger cultural traditions that are shared by a community or society.
One of the main functions of tradition is to provide a sense of belonging and connection to others. When we participate in traditional activities and customs, we are reminded of our place within a larger community and the shared history that we have with others. This sense of belonging can be particularly important in times of change or uncertainty, as it helps to provide a sense of stability and continuity.
Traditions also serve as a way to preserve cultural heritage and pass it down to future generations. Whether it is through oral storytelling, cultural festivals, or the preservation of historical sites and artifacts, traditions help to keep the memory and significance of a culture alive.
However, traditions are not always static and can evolve over time. As societies change and new influences are introduced, traditional practices and customs may be adapted or modified in order to remain relevant and meaningful. This process of change and adaptation can be a natural and important part of the evolution of a tradition.
In conclusion, the marrow of tradition is a vital part of human societies, serving as a way to connect people to their cultural and societal roots and preserve cultural heritage. It is through the continuation and evolution of traditions that we are able to understand and appreciate the rich tapestry of human cultures.
3 Static group Comparison In a static group comparison study 2 or more groups
It begins with researchers thinking about what variables are important in their study, particularly demographic variables or attributes that might impact their dependent variable. One group is subject to intervention or manipulation or test stimulus , while the other group s is not. If it were a year long anti-drug program, participants might become less impulsive or better reasoners and this might be responsible for the change in their attitudes toward illegal drugs. The second variant, the self-selected experimental design, is weaker because it encounters a problem in selecting a comparison group. The experimenter begins with a causal hypothesis, which states that one variable the independent variable causes changes in a second variable the effect or dependent variable. The treatment is that the instructor begins publicly taking attendance each day so that students know that the instructor is aware of who is present and who is absent.
Static Group Comparison & Solomon 4
Since the subjects are measured only once, the threats of testing and instrumentations are reduced, but differential mortality rates between experimental and control groups continue to be a potential problem. In other words, the intervention does not impact the program. One is the so-called intact equivalent design, and the other is the self-selected experimental design. In such designs, subjects to be observed are not randomly assigned to different groups to measure the outcomes, as in a randomized experiment, but grouped according to a characteristic that they already possess. In this particular instance, the investigator should select two countries: one in which revolution has taken place and the other in which it has not. The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Ex-post facto design Sometimes it becomes difficult to divide the study population into two clear and similar groups.
