The whitehall study. Inequality, stress, and health: The Whitehall Studies 2022-10-20
The whitehall study
Rating:
7,3/10
1547
reviews
The Whitehall Study is a long-term epidemiological study that has been ongoing since the late 1960s. It was initiated by the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at University College London, and is named after the Whitehall area of London where many government offices are located. The study has focused on the health and well-being of British civil servants, with the goal of understanding the social and psychological factors that influence health outcomes.
One of the key findings of the Whitehall Study is the existence of a "social gradient" in health. This refers to the observation that people of lower socio-economic status tend to have poorer health outcomes than those of higher socio-economic status. This gradient is evident in a variety of health outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, and risk factors for disease.
The Whitehall Study has also found that psychological factors, such as stress, anxiety, and depression, are significantly related to health outcomes. For example, individuals with high levels of stress or depression are more likely to develop cardiovascular disease and other physical health problems.
In addition to its focus on the social and psychological determinants of health, the Whitehall Study has also examined the impact of work-related factors on health. It has found that individuals who have higher levels of job control and decision-making power tend to have better health outcomes than those with low levels of control. On the other hand, those who have high levels of job demand and low levels of support from colleagues or supervisors are more likely to experience health problems.
Overall, the Whitehall Study has contributed a great deal to our understanding of the factors that influence health and well-being, and has helped to identify potential interventions and policies that can improve the health of populations. Its findings have important implications for policymakers, public health practitioners, and individuals who are seeking to improve their own health and well-being.
Identifying health inequalities: the Whitehall study
For Whitehall, this will include small amount of mold removal, paper conservation on some torn papers and a lot of removal of rusty metal staples as well as the re-filing and boxing of the collection into acid free enclosures. Childhood social circumstances and psychosocial and behavioral factors as determinants af plasma fibrogen. Epidemiological studies such as the US based Framingham Heart Study had identified risk factors, such as hypertension, cholesterol levels, smoking and obesity as factors increasing likelihood of the disease. Mean length of follow up was 5. Twenty years later, the Whitehall II study documented a similar gradient in morbidity in women as well as men. Marmot is currently the commissioner of the.
Next
The Whitehall Study archive collection
In order to address inequalities in health it is necessary both to understand how social organisation affects health and to find ways to improve the conditions in which people work and live. What can be done at the community level? New, landmark findings revolved around gender differences and isolation as possible causes of this inverse relationship. The higher the job status of the man, the more likely he was to be married or cohabitating, but the opposite was true for women. An important difference to the first study is that this one also includes women. Interpretation: Much of the inverse social gradient in CHD incidence can be attributed to differences in psychosocial work environment. You can see these in the table below along with their definitions and the results from the study: Work Characteristic Definition Result Job demands The extent to which someone feels overworked. Which item explains why medicine is considered not only a career but also a profession? Which of the following was the conclusion researchers reached in the Whitehall study of British civil servants, conducted by Marmot and others? There are multiple variables that can mediate explain or moderate influence the relationship between status and stress.
Next
Introduction to the Whitehall Study cataloguing project
Along with the main survey, participants were selected for controlled trials examining the effects of prevention treatments for smokers and dietary changes for participants at risk of diabetes. Occ Health Rev 1996;26-30. According to Whitehall study researchers, "a steep inverse association between social class, as assessed by grade of employment, and mortality from a wide range of diseases" has been demonstrated. The Whitehall II study gives us some hope — you could have low status at work and still be happy if you feel in control of your work and workload, have consistent social support and feel properly rewarded for your efforts. In general, women had greater morbidity than men in all grades of employment. This association could not be explained by employment grade, negative affectivity, or classic coronary risk factors. The first Whitehall Study compared mortality of people in the highly stratified environment of the British Civil Service.
Next
Whitehall_Study
Of course, this is secondary to the primary benefit of making sure everyone can get healthcare. Credit: Stolz Gary M, USFWS, pixnio. Low decision latitude less control was associated with increased rates of angina chest pain , which is a symptom of CHD. We offer a diverse selection of courses from leading universities and cultural institutions from around the world. Conclusion: Low control in the work environment is associated with an increased risk of future coronary heart disease among men and women employed in government offices.
Next
Background
The results showed that 462 of the men died in the ten-year period because of CHD — this is almost half of the total number of deaths during the study 1,086. The theory is based on a pathogenic contribution to coronary heart disease and the stressed body's inability to fight it. Can you think of any reasons why rank in your job could increase rates of CHD? Br Med J 1993-306:361-366. New, landmark findings revolved around gender differences and isolation as possible causes of this inverse relationship. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health in 1978, followed British civil servants over ten years from 1967-1977 and ultimately showed an inverse association between employment grade and mortality from a variety of illnesses. Soc Soc Med 1992;35:1027-1035. New, landmark findings revolved around gender differences and isolation as possible causes of this inverse relationship.
Next
What is the whitehall study? Explained by FAQ Blog
And more than that, they found a social gradient. Psychology and Health 1993;8:123-124. The second is that the gradient of health in industrialised societies is simply a matter of poor health for the disadvantaged and good health for everyone else. Should the participant die, a copy of the death certificate was sent to the investigators. The reason it was set up was cardiovascular disease was seen as the major killer of people within that age group, not just in the UK, but across the globe. It showed that among British civil servants, none of whom was poor in the absolute sense, there was a social gradient in mortality that ran from the bottom to the top of society.
Next
Whitehall I « Heart Attack Prevention
By 1982, investigators were able to show that the lower the status of the job held, the worse the health status. Who conducted the Whitehall study? So lower status jobs had a higher risk of heart disease. Death certifications continued to be collected until the early 2000s, with analysis of the mortality rates continuing to this day. Social differentials in health within and between populations. Therefore, the relationship between status and stress is different in human populations compared to animal populations. The Whitehall Studies helped public health researchers develop a nuanced perspective on the relationship between socioeconomic position and health.
Next
The Whitehall Study
Am H Public Health 1996;86:332-340. A major challenge, and a reason for the importance of these studies, was to understand the causes of this social distribution of so many disorders. The initial study, the Whitehall I Study, was conducted over a period of ten years, beginning in 1967. And it meant that we needed to think about health inequalities as a sliding scale from poorest to richest in society. Regardless of rank, people with high job demands had higher rates of CHD. CHD was the major killer of post-war population and epidemiological work was needed to find the causes of CHD in the working population.
Next
Key Studies: Workplace stress, status and the Whitehall Studies
One conclusion from the Whitehall study is that your rank in the office could affect affect your stress levels and this might have dire consequences for your physical health. Retrieved 15 October 2019. A high school kid might feel like an outsider with few friends at school but have thousands of followers on social media. Psychiatric disorder as a predictor of coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1513-1516. Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. In monkey troops, status has a more direct effect on seriously stressful situations like access to food and surviving predators by staying with the group.
Next
What Is The Significance Of The Whitehall Study?
Explaining socioeconomic differences in sickness absence: the Whitehall II study. Main outcome measures: New cases of angina Rose questionnaire , severe pain across the chest, diagnosed ischaemic heart disease, and any coronary event. The second Whitehall Study launched in 1985, was set up to find the underlying cause of this difference and the study is going to this day Layout of Whitehall Study survey centre What is within the collection? The Department is part of the Founder of Whitehall II: Michael Marmot The founder of Whitehall II, Professor Sir Michael Marmot, was knighted in 2000 for his services to epidemiology and the understanding of health inequalities. How does wealth affect health? The social gradient in health means that health inequities affect everyone. So the social gradient isn't only related to poverty, it's related to where you are in the hierarchy. Trust is the sine qua non of medicine.
Next