Projective measures of personality. The Rorschach Test 2022-10-18
Projective measures of personality Rating:
5,8/10
353
reviews
Projective measures of personality are psychological tests that aim to uncover an individual's unconscious thoughts, feelings, and motivations through the interpretation of their responses to ambiguous stimuli. These tests are based on the premise that when presented with an unstructured task, individuals will unconsciously project their own attitudes and characteristics onto the task, thereby revealing aspects of their personality that may be otherwise difficult to discern.
One of the most well-known projective measures is the Rorschach Inkblot Test. Developed in the 1920s by Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach, this test involves presenting individuals with a series of ten inkblots and asking them to describe what they see in each one. The test is administered by a trained professional who then analyzes the content, form, and context of the individual's responses to uncover their underlying personality traits.
Another commonly used projective measure is the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), which was developed by Henry Murray and Christiana Morgan in the 1930s. The TAT involves presenting individuals with a series of ambiguous pictures and asking them to create a story or describe what is happening in the picture. As with the Rorschach, the individual's responses are analyzed by a trained professional to identify personality traits and unconscious conflicts.
Projective measures have been widely used in clinical and research settings, but they have also been the subject of criticism and controversy. Some critics argue that the interpretations of these tests are highly subjective and may be influenced by the personal biases of the individual administering the test. Others argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the validity and reliability of these measures as indicators of personality.
Despite these criticisms, projective measures continue to be widely used due to their potential to provide insight into an individual's unconscious thoughts and motivations. While they may not be perfect, they can be a useful tool for psychologists and mental health professionals in understanding and treating their patients.
PROJECTIVE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS — Mark L. Goldstein Ph.D.
The Rorschach and TAT techniques include both of these stimulus and response attributes. A comparative study of dreams and related fantasies: Dissertation Abstracts International. Self-report inventories involve having test-takers read questions and then rate how well the question or statement applies to them. A Test of Social Intelligence? An important factor making the response less amenable to conscious manipulation faking is that the respondent does not comprehend the meaning of the answers given. Political attitudes of Christian and Moslem children: Israel and the West Bank: European Jo.
The psychoanalytic school of thinking argued that humans had unconscious ideas and impulses, which led to this projective personality assessment. DAP: Back against the wall? Effect of role-empathy on height of human figures drawn by male alcoholics: Perceptual and Motor Skills 30 3 1970, 747-752. As the name implies, you must sketch a person, which will subsequently be assessed by the test interpreter. It is generally felt that formulation of specifically-worded questions is counterproductive; rather, the interviewer, who should be an experienced clinician trained in the use of the procedure, should be able to formulate questions that will elicit the required information. Springfield, Charles C Thomas, 1978. Furthermore, others Garb, et al, 2005 have argued that results may actually decrease the accuracy of clinical judgments, because evaluators may attend too much to the invalid information.
What Is Projective Testing and Why Might My Child Need It?
Inkblot and engagement tests in psychotherapy: Revue de Psychologie Appliquee Vol 40 2 1990, 139-147. Rorschachiana XXIII: Yearbook of the International Rorschach Society. Sociology Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. As for limitations, to use the test, any specialist is expected to have experience with projective assessments and know how to avoid distorting data during interpretation Meyer et al. Paper presented at the 103rd annual convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Scores made by retarded readers on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 33 3, Pt 2 Dec 1971, 1089-1090. Studies of family relations test patterns: I. What are the two main types of personality? Review of Rorschach with Children: A Comparative Study of the Contribution Made by the Rorschach and Other Projective Techniques to Clinical Diagnosis in Work With Children: PsycCRITIQUES Vol 14 11 , Nov, 1969. The use of human figure drawings to assess a cultural value: Smiling in Thailand: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied Vol 80 2 Mar 1972, 203-204. Both the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts 2006 and the American Psychological Association 2009 recommend that multiple data gathering strategies be utilized in custody evaluations, and cite the use of psychological tests as one of the possible methodologies.
How Are Projective Tests Used To Measure Personality? (3 Ways)
Scoring accuracy using the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach. Psychological reactions of children with malignancies: Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry Vol 15 2 Spr 1976, 314-325. Comparison of data gathered on sensitive questions via direct questionnaire, randomized response technique, and a projective method: Psychological Reports Vol 47 3, Pt 1 Dec 1980, 743-750. Below, we will discuss the origins of four common projective tests or classes of tests , focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of them and the scientific evidence for such theories. The child's family drawing as a measure of stressful family environment: Dissertation Abstracts International. The TAT has been used most recently in counseling as a way to help patients see and understand their own beliefs.
Evaluation of objective and projective personality measures
The prototypical percept-genetic instrument is the Defense Mechanism Test DMT Kragh, 1985 which construes major Freudian defense mechanisms as distorted pre-recognition responses to threatening stimuli. What do you see when you look at this image? What are the 3 types of personality? Furthermore, they reported that the HTP was employed in 14% of cases, the Rorschach was used in 13% of cases, the PORT was used in 10% of cases and the RATC was employed in 8% of cases. The psychoanalytic interpretation of dreams and projective techniques: American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 28 1958, 67-72. The Adult Attachment Projective: Disorganization of adult attachment at the level of representation. Contributions of the sentence-completing method to the study of psychogenia: Neurologia, Psihiatria, Neurochirurgia Vol 14 2 Mar 1969, 175-178. A combined projective and psychogalvanic response technique for investigating certain affective processes: Journal of Consulting Psychology Vol 11 5 Sep 1947, 270-275. A rater is the one who rates a particular trait in another individual.
An investigation of the influence of response sets on the Holtzman projective technique: Dissertation Abstracts International. Ink blot test or rorschach test It was first designed by H. Although the Rorschach has typically been cited as the most widely used projective instrument, Erard 2007 has suggested that the Rorschach is a performance based instrument. Unobtrusive assessment of interpersonal affect through expressive line drawings: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 44 2 Apr 1977, 423-428. There are undoubtedly many reasons for the decline in utilization of projective techniques, but in our view they can be summarized by the following points: 1.
Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher. Kinetic family drawings K-F-D : An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. The different methods of measuring personality can be broadly divided into two categories namely non - projective and projective. Interpretations should be made with caution and the limitations of projective tests should be considered. Perceptual defense and projective tests: The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Vol 47 2, Suppl Apr 1952, 302-308. The sign approach attempts to provide empirical evidence for interpretations through the identification of features that occur most frequently in specified clinical populations.
However, many practitioners continue to rely on projective testing, and some testing experts e. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1978. A note on the relationships between the Draw-a-Man Test, the Progressive Matrices test, and conservation: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 74 2 1970, 231-235. The exposure of online information appeared to most significantly impact the variables associated with perceptual accuracy and reality testing. Artists, architects, and engineers: Three contrasting modes of visual experience and their psychological correlates: Journal of Personality Vol 39 3 Sep 1971, 432-449.
The reliability of a multiple choice group Rorschach test: Journal of Applied Psychology Vol 31 2 Apr 1947, 199-211. A study of selected style and content variables in the drawings of depressed and nondepressed adults: Dissertation Abstracts International. Projective Methodologies: Annual Review of Psychology 18 1967, 165-190. Parents are often interested in interpretation of these drawings. The tests are open to interpretation by different reviewers, it can be time-consuming and expensive to train interviewers to give and assess them, most are not standardized, and a subject's answers may differ if given the test on a different day. Since the appearance of the second edition of this handbook, use of the MMPI-2 has been widely adopted.
