Endogamy is a social practice in which people marry within a specific group or social unit. This group could be defined by cultural, religious, or ethnic ties, or it could be based on social class or other shared characteristics. Endogamy is the opposite of exogamy, which refers to the practice of marrying outside of one's group.
Endogamy has a long history, and it has been practiced in many different societies around the world. In some cases, endogamy is a traditional or cultural practice that has been passed down for generations. In other cases, it may be a more recent development, driven by a desire to maintain cultural or religious traditions or to strengthen social ties within a specific group.
There are many reasons why people may choose to practice endogamy. For some, endogamy is a way to maintain cultural traditions and to ensure that their children will be raised in a certain cultural or religious context. For others, endogamy is a way to strengthen social bonds within a group and to ensure that resources and support are shared within the community.
Endogamy can also have economic benefits. For example, in some societies, endogamy may be used to preserve and protect the wealth and resources of a particular group. By marrying within the group, individuals can help to ensure that resources are not dissipated or lost to outsiders.
Endogamy can also have negative consequences, however. In some cases, endogamy may be used to maintain social hierarchy or to perpetuate discrimination and inequality. For example, in some societies, endogamy has been used to maintain caste systems or to keep certain groups in positions of power and privilege. In other cases, endogamy may be used to restrict the freedom and choices of individuals, particularly women.
Overall, endogamy is a complex social practice that has both positive and negative consequences. While it can be a way to maintain cultural traditions and strengthen social bonds, it can also be used to perpetuate discrimination and restrict the freedom and choices of individuals.
Gospel of Wealth by Andrew Carnegie
Unequally or unjustly, perhaps, as these laws sometimes operate, and imperfect as they appear to the Idealist, they are, nevertheless, like the highest type of man, the best and most valuable of all that humanity has yet accomplished. That is why there is a question that wonders if the parents should give their children wealth. Owners and workers become strangers to each other, and friction develops between owners and workers. Reading about the devotion to giving back by this great man was enjoyable. Carnegie was born in Scotland and later migrated to America. It is not to be wondered at that such bequests seem so generally to lack the blessing. His idea, called 'The Gospel of Wealth,' has influenced American millionaires ever since, including people like Bill Gates.
The Gospel of Wealth PDF Summary
Therefore, this method of money spending is portrayed negatively to accentuate its ineffectiveness in making beneficial changes in the world. Though I am strongly against some of the capitalist euphoria expressed in the book. Smith worried that we would have a tendency to worship the rich and neglect the poor; that we may falsely link wealth with virtue, and poverty with laziness. Many of the reviewers struggled to tear away from their modern view while reading it. If any family be chiefly known for display, for extravagance in home, table, equipage, for enormous sums ostentatiously spent in any form upon itself, if these be its chief distinctions, we have no difficulty in estimating its nature or culture. The former, he believes, deserve to have their wealth because it is the proof of their greater "fitness.
Gospel of Wealth: Author, Summary & Meaning
So an ideal needed to be created. He stated the wealthy should not be irresponsible with money waste or self-indulgent. He insists that Rich people should be taxed more and money should go to public interest. Some people go back when there is more equality for everyone. The need for this new managerial staff facilitated the emergence of the middle class. The landlord has books and pictures rarer, and appointments more artistic, than the King could then obtain. Nor need it be feared that this policy would sap the root of enterprise and render men less anxious to accumulate, for to the class whose ambition it is to leave great fortunes and be talked about after their death, it will attract even more attention, and, indeed, be a somewhat nobler ambition to have enormous sums paid over to the state from their fortunes.
Andrew Carnegie The Gospel Of Wealth Summary
He believed that it should instead be used for programs and institutions that would benefit the common good. Carnegie was a Scottish immigrant who became the second richest man in America. On the other hand, philanthropy is not used to gain influence, but rather to obtain prestige and respectability. He points to European aristocracy as an example of how ruinous inherited wealth can be. The rule of competition has many issues. He is the only true reformer who is as careful and as anxious not to aid the unworthy as he is to aid the worthy, and, perhaps, even more so, for in alms-giving more injury is probably done by rewarding vice than by relieving virtue. Maintaining his support for attaining massive wealth, Carnegie also instructed other individuals on how to spend their wealth.
The Gospel of Wealth by Andrew Carnegie
Carnegie praises the trend of governments imposing higher taxes on inherited wealth taxes on money inherited upon the death of a wealthy person. However, this meant that power and wealth was concentrated in the hands of a very few, and the divide between rich and poor had widened considerably. The cases are not few in which the real object sought by the testator is not attained, nor are they few in which his real wishes are thwarted. The 'Gospel of Wealth' has been a major influence on Americans like Bill Gates who follow Carnegie's example. Under its sway we shall have an ideal state, in which the surplus wealth of the few will become, in the best sense the property of the many, because administered for the common good, and this wealth, passing through the hands of the few, can be made a much more potent force for the elevation of our race than if it had been distributed in small sums to the people themselves.
