Evaluation apprehension is a psychological phenomenon that refers to the anxiety or stress that individuals experience when they are being evaluated by others. This model was first proposed by social psychologist Harold H. Kelley in 1950, and it has been widely studied and discussed in the field of psychology ever since.
According to the evaluation apprehension model, individuals are motivated to seek positive evaluations from others, and this desire for approval can be a powerful influence on their behavior. When people are being evaluated, they may be more likely to perform in a way that they think will be perceived positively by the evaluator, even if that means deviating from their true beliefs or values. For example, a student may choose to go along with the opinions of their peers even if they disagree with them, in order to avoid being negatively evaluated by the group.
There are several factors that can affect the degree to which individuals experience evaluation apprehension. One important factor is the perceived importance of the evaluation. If the individual believes that the evaluation is important, they may be more anxious about it and more likely to experience evaluation apprehension. Another factor is the perceived competence of the evaluator. If the individual believes that the evaluator is competent and knowledgeable, they may be more anxious about the evaluation and more likely to experience evaluation apprehension.
There are also individual differences in how susceptible individuals are to evaluation apprehension. Some people are naturally more anxious about being evaluated by others and may experience evaluation apprehension more readily. Others may be more self-confident and less anxious about evaluations, and may be less likely to experience evaluation apprehension.
Evaluation apprehension can have both positive and negative consequences. On the positive side, it can motivate individuals to work hard and perform to the best of their ability in order to receive positive evaluations. However, it can also lead to negative outcomes, such as cheating or lying in order to receive a positive evaluation, or avoiding situations where they might be evaluated in order to avoid the anxiety associated with evaluation apprehension.
Overall, the evaluation apprehension model highlights the importance of social evaluations in shaping human behavior, and the ways in which individuals are motivated to seek approval and avoid negative evaluations from others. Understanding this model can help individuals and organizations to better understand and manage the impact of social evaluations on behavior.
Evaluation apprehension model
If production blocking is the major cause, then the solution is to devise procedures or technologies that allow simultaneous input. Read more Navigate Down WANTS AND NEEDS ANALYSIS Catherine Courage, Kathy Baxter, in Understanding Your Users, 2005 Pen-and-paper brainstorming There are a few ways, other than effective moderation, to address the issues that are a natural part of brainstorming. This response set is important for personality researchers because it threatens valid interpretation of test results. Still, it has been shown to lead in consistently better predictive results; therefore its being used in the research. Therefore, the researchers conducted an experiment that tested the relationship between collectivism and corruption with the independent variable being evaluation apprehension. Evaluation Apprehension Model: The literal meaning of the word "evaluation" is to be judged or watched, while that of "apprehension" is to worry.
Evaluation Apprehension
There is some consensus that social-esteem is influenced by evaluation apprehension given that they are both related to a person's apprehension of being evaluated by others. For example, a person who is trying out for cheerleading will feel a heightened sense of arousal leading to incompetence not just because others are around, but because of the fear that others are observing and ridiculing them. An indirect manipulation of evaluation apprehension is demonstrated in Leary et al. In the area of group dynamics, Shaw and McGrath provided an integrative conceptual framework for synthesizing the voluminous body of group research and presented approaches to the study of groups. Evaluation apprehension can affect subjects' behavior in psychological experiments, and can lead to invalid casual interference. He argued that we quickly learn that the social rewards and punishments for example, in the form of approval and disapproval that we receive from other people are based on their For example, a person who is trying out for cheerleading will feel a heightened sense of arousal leading to incompetence not just because others are around, but because of the fear that others are observing and ridiculing them.
Evaluation apprehension model explained
To replicate traditional research, they compared interacting groups and nominal groups isolated individuals brainstorming independently. When in the presence of coactors or observers, cockroaches ran the simple runway more rapidly but took longer to navigate the maze, replicating prior social facilitation research on humans and other animals. Individuals who expected judgment produced fewer ideas than those who did not, especially when the discussion topics were controversial. In this situation, evaluation apprehension is called Evaluation apprehension can affect subjects' behavior in psychological experiments, and can lead to invalid Other research on evaluation apprehension has shown that, when they must make a choice, subjects are more concerned with presenting themselves in a favorable light this has been called the apprehensive hypothesis, the "good subject role". Studies have demonstrated that evaluation apprehension may moderate this relationship.
Evaluation apprehension model — Wikipedia Republished // WIKI 2
They found a strong effect of evaluative tone, with groups containing a critical confederate generating more ideas, but only weak effects of anonymity. For example, a person who is trying out for cheerleading will feel a heightened sense of arousal leading to incompetence not just because others are around, but because of the fear that others are observing and ridiculing them. Peter McNally, in Understanding your Users Second Edition , 2015 Including Individual Activities While the purpose of a focus group is to understand perspectives from a group, this does not preclude also collecting data from individuals. Avoid inviting managers who are tyrannical. The evaluation apprehension theory was proposed by Nickolas B.
22 Hilarious Evaluation apprehension model Puns
Later research has largely supported Zajonc's view for a review, see Bond and Titus 1983. For example, women taking a math test may not perform to their full potential because of concerns regarding women's stereotyped difficulties with math. This bias is the tendency to give the "socially desired response" e. On the other hand, they hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation when evaluation apprehension was low because people would have low fear of judgment from others for being corrupt. The manipulation of evaluation apprehension To study the casual influence of evaluation apprehension in experimental designs, experimenters frequently have to try to manipulate this variable. All the ideas are collected, again without discussion, and clear duplicates are eliminated.
