Pecuniary jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear cases involving monetary claims or disputes. In Uttar Pradesh, the pecuniary jurisdiction of civil courts is determined by the value of the claim or dispute at hand.
In Uttar Pradesh, the District Court is the primary court for cases involving pecuniary jurisdiction. The District Court has the authority to hear cases involving monetary claims or disputes that are valued at more than INR 20,000. If the value of the claim or dispute is less than INR 20,000, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Small Causes Court.
The pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Court can be further divided into two categories: original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of the District Court to hear cases for the first time, while appellate jurisdiction refers to the authority of the District Court to hear appeals from lower courts.
In cases involving original jurisdiction, the District Court has the authority to hear cases involving monetary claims or disputes that are valued at more than INR 50,000. If the value of the claim or dispute is between INR 20,000 and INR 50,000, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Small Causes Court, but can be appealed to the District Court.
In cases involving appellate jurisdiction, the District Court has the authority to hear appeals from the Small Causes Court and other lower courts in Uttar Pradesh. The District Court also has the authority to hear appeals from the High Court in cases where the value of the claim or dispute is more than INR 1 lakh.
In addition to the District Court, the High Court of Allahabad also has pecuniary jurisdiction in Uttar Pradesh. The High Court has the authority to hear cases involving monetary claims or disputes that are valued at more than INR 2 lakhs. The High Court also has the authority to hear appeals from the District Court and other lower courts in Uttar Pradesh.
In summary, the pecuniary jurisdiction of civil courts in Uttar Pradesh is determined by the value of the claim or dispute at hand. The District Court has the primary jurisdiction for cases involving monetary claims or disputes, while the High Court has jurisdiction for cases involving higher values. The Small Causes Court also has jurisdiction for cases involving lower values, but these cases can be appealed to the District Court.
What is a multi valued attribute example?
The following image illustrated the Theory-of-Reasoned-Action Multi Attribute Model: Image Source: For example, suppose there is a graduate student who wishes to write the GMAT exam to get admitted into a good university for his MBA. What do you understand by multi attribute search give an example? The conative component is concerned with the likelihood that a consumer will act in a specific fashion with respect to the attitude object. These components could be perceived benefits, functions, product features, etc. The association or reflection that a product or service has on the consumer is the main concern of an individual embracing the value expressive function Solomon, 2008. Retrieved October 2, 2010, from Petty, R.
Multi Attribute Attitude Models
It refers to the property of the Model object. Changing beliefs is sometimes a necessary, for example, when a mature product is to be reintroduced into the market Arora, 2007. Multi-attribute research in marketing seeks an understanding of the structure of customer decisions with respect to the market offerings of a firm and its competitors. The basic multiattribute model has three elements—attributes, beliefs, and weights. The low-involvement hierarchy consists of a cognition-behavior-affect order of events. Differentiation is an important advantage to marketers. Yet, just as the firms have made decisions about who they are and what they do, consumers make similar decisions about what they value and what they need.
What is meant by multi attribute attitude model?
The knowledge function is prevalent in individuals who are careful about organizing and providing structure regarding their attitude or opinion of a product or service Solomon, 2008. The store with the highest score is recognized as having the most perceived differences in overall attitude. The utilitarian function is based on the ethical theory of utilitarianism, whereas an individual will make decisions based entirely on the producing the greatest amount of happiness as a whole Sidgwick, 1907. Retrieved October 3, 2010, from Novack, J. For example, people tend to buy different kinds of clothes for different occasions because having suited clothing for each occasion will help people fit in and hence, cause relief. The decision is based on the attributes of the options. In other words, consumers generally have favorable attitudes toward those brands that they believe have an adequate level of attributes that they evaluate as positive, and they have unfavorable attitudes towards those brands they feel do not have an adequate level of desired attributes or have too many negative or undesired attributes.
