Why shouldn t college athletes get paid. Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid 2022-10-20
Why shouldn t college athletes get paid Rating:
9,2/10
1992
reviews
There are several reasons why college athletes should not be paid.
First and foremost, college athletes are student-athletes, meaning that they are attending college primarily to receive an education and earn a degree. Many college athletes are on scholarship and receive a number of other benefits, such as free tuition, housing, and access to top-quality athletic facilities and training. These benefits are often worth tens of thousands of dollars and are more than sufficient compensation for the time and effort that college athletes put into their sport.
Furthermore, paying college athletes could create significant financial and logistical challenges for colleges and universities. These institutions are already facing financial pressure and paying student-athletes could put additional strain on their budgets. In addition, paying college athletes could also create inequities between different sports and teams, as some sports generate more revenue than others. This could lead to disputes and controversies over how to distribute the money fairly.
Additionally, there are concerns that paying college athletes could lead to corruption and exploitation. Professional sports leagues have struggled with issues such as performance-enhancing drugs, gambling, and match-fixing, and paying college athletes could potentially create similar problems at the collegiate level. It could also create pressure for athletes to prioritize their sport over their education, potentially leading to a decline in academic performance.
In conclusion, while it may be tempting to pay college athletes for the time and effort they put into their sport, there are several compelling reasons why this is not a good idea. College athletes are student-athletes and should be primarily focused on receiving an education and earning a degree. Paying college athletes could create financial and logistical challenges for colleges and universities, as well as potentially lead to corruption and exploitation. It is important to remember that college athletes already receive a number of benefits and that these benefits are sufficient compensation for their efforts.
Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
This goes to prove the difference between what college athletes and normal college students receive. If student-athletes network at college the right way, they can use that to their benefit in job searches. The idea of paying college athletes a salary comes out of the revenues which are generated by sporting activities. They have access to many facilities that provide them with some of the best equipment they can get. This would be violating the federal Title IX law. Some students in other programs would likely not earn the same amount as an athlete for their work-study program. Without them, there would be no attraction to the games and merchandise which means no money.
In reality, much of that money is already used by the conferences and schools to host games or conduct events already. In addition, they will graduate with a degree. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid …show more content… Another reason that it would be bad for college athletes to be paid is because the colleges would build a bad reputation for being all about the money and not about education. According to research, only about 62 percent of students at a four-year school check their bank account balances and only 39 percent of these students use a budget. For example, the valedictorian of my high school class really wanted to go to Georgetown.
This was so interesting! Moreover, this does not include their medical and travel allowances, professional coach and also the chance to audition for professional jobs. Would athletes become lazy? Some participants would still be minors, which means their parents would need to be involved in contract negotiations. By providing college athletes with an income they will not have to struggle to get things that they want and need. But the questions connected to compensating athletes are wide-ranging and complex. Pay minimizes athlete corruption. Ekow Yankah: I think paying college athletes is almost certainly bad for the athletes, terrible for the universities, and terrible for the sports they play. Division III sports programs do not award sports scholarships, although other forms of financial aid are available to student athletes at these schools.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? Reasons Why or Why Not
Despite this growth, barely any of the money has trickled down to the athletes filling the stadiums. While researching on forbes. Despite all the tickets, merchandise, and memorabilia that these big name universities sell, they cannot break even. The access to education is dependant upon continuous participation in sports for which they receives the scholarship. This is another job opportunity for an athlete. It encourages healthier student athletes.
So it is pretty much up to them to be smart with it and not blow it on something stupid. The schools would have to address Title IX issues for equality, which could mean the cutting of athletic programs that may generate revenue but are not Title IX compliant. List of the Pros of Paying College Athletes 1. Beginning in 1985, the Colleges should not pay their athletes at the expense of hosting entertaining games. KELLY: What did you make of this announcement yesterday? At the time, the game went viral and a plethora amount of people went out of their way to buy it.
Commentary: Griner was really a victim of low regard for women's sports
A school's boosters club is made up of alumni that give a lot of money to the school. The college sports should not be centred on the money alone. This is due to the fact that most schools may not have as much money as others, and because some teams are more favored than others. College students are terrible with money for the most part. Especially those that have to work one or several part-time jobs just to be able to afford tuition, housing, and food. Elisa Van Kirk is visiting assistant professor of education at St. They have to pay to build facilities, pay coaches, give scholarships, and pay athletic directors to make sure that the school has the best chance of winning.
An Argument For Not Allowing College Athletes To Earn Compensation : NPR
EKOW YANKAH: Thank you for having me. Feel how you want to about Griner, but the reality is that many female athletes today are devalued and not respected, as reflected in their status as athletes or compensation. In conclusion, I believe that players in collegiate teams should not be payed. For example, when you talk about these athletes not making the money after they leave the NCAA, it would significantly strengthen your argument if you had a statistic about how small the percentage of college athletes that go professional actual is. For some institutions, the costs could actually go down.
Sports allow students to acquire many important values, such as fair competition and physical and mental health. Now, people who believe college athletes should be paid see this cost and immediately say, if Auburn can spend this much on a screen, they certainly can spend money on paying their athletes. Despite the hindrances in the system, pay to the student athlete contradicts to the primary function of education institution. Since the NCAA is the governing body of college athletics, it is extremely unlikely that it would change its stance on student athlete compensation. This money is meant to help athletes from impoverished backgrounds live like average students without hardship. If athletes were to be paid, instead of learning responsibilities and learning from mistakes, they would be living lavishly on their salary which would take away many personality shaping experiences. Paying them would affect their character and it would affect the way they act if they were to go out in the real world and play professionally.
An Opinion Why Ncaa College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
Pay deemphasizes academic purpose. Every year, they get cut down. Another problem with paying the athletes of the more popular sports, and not paying the rest, is the very real risk of having a discrimination suit filed against them. So would a college really want to lose more money just by paying students to play a sport? The smaller sports that do not generate enough revenue to sustain the program would definitely get cut. Because of the number of sports a college usually offers, there is one very big debate. But even so, college athletes have access to even more.
There are also a number of drawbacks that make it difficult for the school, athletics department, other students at the academic institution, and taxpayers. Despite rules preventing such actions, coaches, shoe executives, agents, apparel representatives, and other industry professionals often conspire to pay recruits to join a specific college. In this case we are talking about NCAA college athletes. College athletes are not professional A student athlete focuses on education and sport unlike professionals who focussed on sports alone. Football is a very difficult sport to play, these players practice and practice, they need to be rewarded for all this work. Reasons why student athletes should not be paid Opponents to paying college athletes rebut these arguments by pointing to the primary role of colleges and universities: to provide students with a rewarding educational experience that prepares them for their professional careers.
