Nightmare on elm street movie review. A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) Reviews 2022-10-22
Nightmare on elm street movie review Rating:
6,1/10
490
reviews
Nightmare on Elm Street is a horror film released in 1984, directed by Wes Craven and starring Robert Englund as the iconic killer, Freddy Krueger. The film follows a group of teenagers who are being terrorized by Krueger in their dreams, causing them to fear falling asleep and eventually leading to their deaths.
One of the standout aspects of the film is the concept of the dream world and the blurring of the line between reality and the nightmare realm. This is expertly executed through the use of surreal and disturbing imagery, as well as the use of special effects to bring Krueger's twisted antics to life.
The film also does a great job of building suspense and tension through its use of atmosphere and sound design. The film's iconic score, coupled with the eerie sound effects and camera work, helps to create a sense of unease and keep the viewer on the edge of their seat.
One of the most memorable aspects of the film is Englund's portrayal of Krueger. He perfectly captures the character's twisted sense of humor and sadistic nature, making him a truly terrifying villain. The supporting cast also does a great job, with each character being well-developed and relatable.
Overall, Nightmare on Elm Street is a classic horror film that still holds up today. Its unique concept and strong execution make it a must-see for any fan of the genre.
A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) Worth Watching?
What mars the first half of the film is an insistence on not developing characters. But with none of A and far too little of B, the new Elm Street barely rises above an F. The 1984 A Nightmare on Elm Street was a refreshing, novel, approach to the slasher subgenre film. The actors are giving their best but some of the dialog is just plain cheesy. . But it is among the most pointless, at least to me. The effects aren't great, it would be easy to beat the dead horse of 'computer graphics' being inferior but I think the real problem here is directorial.
Nightmare on ELM Street Movie Review {3/5}: Critic Review of Nightmare on ELM Street by Times of India
There are several things that make this movie a good horror classic. I didn't buy that they were sleep deprived as the actors had shaggy or ratty hair and clothes, baggy eyes and looked strung out on heroin since the beginning of the film. Let me start right off the bat by saying: yes, I was a big fan of NOES in the 80s, I cherish fond memories of watching the first one on VHS when I was 11, saw NOES 4 in theater and every sequel after that. I'll do my obligatory feature film! To make him seem human, is eliminating the scare factor from his mythology. She wasn't cute, she wasn't spunky, and she wasn't a fighter, all three of which were nicely exhibited by Heather Langenkamp in the original. In terms of the directing, I was set up for beautiful atmospheric shots as seen in the title sequence. But Englund gave us a new kind of Boogeyman - a smartass.
It does good to set one the eerie atmosphere, but the film score sound so genetic or trying to retune the original. If he kills you in your dreams, you're dead for real. Craven and his team took a small budget and used it to create a supernatural dream universe unlike anything horror had seen before. However the greatest performance is -- not surprisingly -- by Robert Englund, as Freddy, who is in the film barely at all. Her mother, worried for Nancy's sanity, takes her to a dream clinic where her sleep patterns can be monitored. When Rod turns up dead in his jail cell, Nancy is convinced that a ghostly killer is stalking them in their sleep. The reasons why this movie fail is very clear.
The ending is surprising and very shocking. . This is my stance on remakes. Haley is too short, and too slight, to be a threatening villain. The film overly relies on shock-horror, not actual scares or atmosphere. With her friends dying, a young girl named Nancy begins to question what everyone's connection is to each other, given that none of them can remember each other before their teenage years.
Look for a young Johnny Depp as one of the unlucky teens. Mara, Gallner, Lutz, and the rest of the cast are good-looking, thin, and tedious. Time to take off the nostalgia glasses and remember that NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET has a with a rather rushed and nonsensical ending, despite being a bonafide classic. SPOILERS Focused too much on the secondary characters at the beginning, which was a problem because it was excruciatingly obvious that they were all just Freddy Fodder. I thought the kills and nightmare sequences would be vastly improved upon, but alas, gigabytes, greenscreens and CGI cannot compete with hands-on creativity. Still, there was an interesting swerve with the victims that was pretty interesting.
Freddy Krugger looks like a burned piece of meat after coming out of the fire where he wears a red and green stripe sweater and has long knives as fingernails and chases his victims when they're asleep giving them a souvenir. A man who not only killed some children but also sexually assaulted them as well. Also the girl who played Nancy, Rooney Mara has one of the dullest performances of the year, where I didn't understand why a guy would have a crush on her or why anyone would want to be her friend. I was fine with letting Robert Englund go. .
Granted, with all his popularity, it might seem pointless to keep him hidden, but it would've made his character a hell of a lot scarier. The simplified story, CG, and casting aren't the only problems, the screenplay seems to be jumbled as certain characters have been blended and displaced. Fans will recognize many of the iconic scenes from the original, with slight, effects-laden alterations that are completely unnecessary. Michael Bay produced the new Nightmare on Elm Street, which is the sixth slasher remake in the last decade with his name in the credits, and as with the others, Nightmare is completely unoriginal and unnecessary. Followed by numerous sequels.
Johnny Depp in his first role as Glen Lantz was awesome, I seriously loved him in 21 Jump Street TV Series and today I still love him in Pirates of the Caribbean film franchise. But in 1984, long before Craven predicted his character would become a huge part of modern pop culture, Freddy was mysterious and not very funny at all. . The cast is quite good. The new music by Steve Jablonsky isn't that good.
The new film stamps it on your forehead that he was doing unsavory things to children which more or less made me sick and made the character less likable. When they begin to die horrible deaths at the hands of the man later identified as Freddy Krueger, a horrible secret is revealed. . I'll start with the positives. To me, that put me off. This is one movie that no horror-fetishist can afford to miss.
Film Review: A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985)
Is it a perfect movie? Outside of A Nightmare on Elm Street, Langenkamp hasn't had much of a career. The level is disinterest never changed with her performance whereas Cassidy put in a raw and emotional part albeit a very tiny part. The kills were boring. Although this one is famously known for Kruger l, I just enjoyed tue whole premise for Scream — even though it repeated itself in all 5 movies. Even though he's an awful person already, you're still left thinking that maybe he was a good guy. He also warps expectations - at times, we're aware that the characters are trapped in a dreamscape, but there are times when we're not.
