Homosexuality, or sexual attraction to people of the same sex, has long been a topic of debate and controversy. Some people believe that homosexuality is a natural and normal part of the human experience, while others believe that it is a choice or the result of environmental influences. So, is homosexuality nurture or nature? The answer is not so simple, as there is evidence to support both sides of the argument.
There is evidence that suggests that homosexuality may be influenced by both nature and nurture. Some research suggests that there may be a genetic component to homosexuality, with studies finding that homosexuality tends to run in families and that there may be specific genes associated with same-sex attraction. However, the role of genetics in determining sexual orientation is still not fully understood and is a subject of ongoing research.
On the other hand, there is also evidence that suggests that environmental factors, such as social and cultural influences, may play a role in the development of homosexuality. For example, some research has found that people who are raised in households with more accepting attitudes towards homosexuality are more likely to identify as gay or lesbian later in life. Other studies have also found that people who have experienced trauma or abuse may be more likely to develop same-sex attraction as a way of coping with their experiences.
Ultimately, the question of whether homosexuality is nature or nurture is complex and multifaceted, and it is likely that both nature and nurture play a role in the development of sexual orientation. It is important to remember that homosexuality is not a choice and that it is a normal and natural part of the human experience. It is also important to recognize that people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual deserve the same respect and rights as anyone else, regardless of their sexual orientation.
Sexual Orientation
I do think that this subject has been bizarrely politicized by the pro-gay lobby, which seems to be under the impression that, if it can be 'proven' that being gay is biologically determined, then gay people will not be oppressed. Those networks, which are connected to our taste buds, detect certain nutrients such as sugars, fats and salts that are present in the food that we chew. Mind your own and enjoy. It is time to start using your brains. The debate continues as both nature and nurture have scientific environments which support them to a great extent. A man could also sow his seed in another man, but that was emasculating for the recipient. Foucault believed that the depth of desire is only sexual preference, that it is nothing more than superficial tastes and preferences.
Homosexuality: The Nature vs. Nurture Debate
He postulates that a weak father and strong mother, with an unresolved Oedipus complex will lead to a weak, and then homosexual, son, because the mother has too strong of an image, compared to the weak state of the father. This is just my opinion though. So something has changed. Yet they're almost identical, genetically. Each person should pursue consensual sexual relations with whichever sex attracts him or her. There's cause and effect.
Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture
We have examined many causes for homosexuality in the preceding pages, both biological and social. . And the theory is if a particular trait is genetic, the identical twins would be more alike than the fraternal twins. Laeurtius wrote that in his adolescence he drew away the husbands from their wives, and as a young man the wives from their husbands. But its not natural because they don't have the biological need for homosexuality. On further examination, Logeto 2020 also reinstated Swaab's observation that the suprachiasmatic nucleus among males measured high among homosexuals than in heterosexuals.
Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture?
What was your motivation? A lot of young teens come to online forums such as GAG asking if other users think they're gay, lesbian, or bi. The identical twins were far more similar than the fraternal twins. . No one would willingly choose to be a minority that society has ridiculed and deemed less than equal. Those molecules are picked up and recognized by innate organs of the second partner. Queer theory With the rise of the gay liberation movement in the post-Stonewall era, overtly gay and lesbian perspectives began to be put forward in politics and philosophy. What makes someone gay? Read More: Conclusion about homosexuality The debates about homosexuality, in part because they often involve public policy and legal issues, always tend to be sharply polarized.
is homosexuality nurture or nature? : DeepThoughts
This is different from homesexuality in the aspect that it explains romantic attraction and has no determination over sexual attraction. The results of this research became the widely popularized Kinsey Scale of Sexuality. Both groups were matched for age, intelligence quotient IQ and education level, and were then subjected to three psychological tests. And a lesbian brain produces more progesterone. But the vested interest that homosexuals have often prevent them from seeing the obvious. As I said in my answer, just because something is not biologically determined, it doesn't mean that that thing is a choice.
Is Homosexuality Nurture or Nature?
Virtually Normal: an Argument about Homosexuality. Instead, it is a direct result of environmental pollution on genetic disposition over many years, decades, or generations. . Furthermore, consequent studies found more conclusive evidence. Most gay people will tell you its not a choice.
