My moral philosophy. My Moral Values: A Personal Reflective Essay Example 2022-11-01
My moral philosophy Rating:
4,9/10
237
reviews
Writing an essay arguing against a particular perspective or idea can be a challenging task, as it requires you to present a well-reasoned and persuasive argument that counters the perspective or idea being presented. One of the key components of a successful argument against a particular perspective or idea is the use of credible and reliable sources to support your position.
When selecting articles to use as evidence in your argument against a particular perspective or idea, it is important to consider their credibility and reliability. This means looking for articles that are written by experts in the field or that are published in reputable sources. It is also important to consider the biases and motivations of the authors of the articles you are using, as these can influence the way in which the information is presented.
In addition to using credible and reliable sources, it is also important to carefully evaluate the evidence presented in the articles you are using. This includes considering the methods used to gather and analyze the data, as well as the limitations and potential biases of the study. By thoroughly evaluating the evidence, you can strengthen your argument by showing that the perspective or idea you are arguing against is not supported by the best available evidence.
Finally, it is important to present your argument in a clear and logical manner, using strong reasoning and evidence to support your position. This may include providing counterarguments to the perspective or idea you are arguing against and refuting these counterarguments with your own evidence and reasoning.
In conclusion, writing an essay arguing against a particular perspective or idea requires the use of credible and reliable sources, careful evaluation of the evidence presented, and strong reasoning and argumentation. By following these guidelines, you can effectively present a well-reasoned and persuasive argument against a particular perspective or idea.
Investigation of My Personal Moral Values and Philosophies: [Essay Example], 1157 words GradesFixer
Almost all non-moral, rational imperatives are problematic, since there are virtually no ends that we necessarily will as human beings. . You either commit to the decision or go against it, whatever you think is right or wrong. If a person is strictly defined by one moral belief than that person will be unable to 2 grow as a human being as his one-sided outlook of the world would restrict him from letting in other views and ideas, therefore people should flexible enough in what they believe. Morality requires too much.
My Moral Values: A Personal Reflective Essay Example
A Kantian, on the other hand, views value as grounded in rational nature, in a will conforming to the Categorical Imperative. It would undoubtedly be a world more primitive than our own, but pursuing such a policy is still conceivable in it. Perhaps we merely intend to bring about the best possible outcomes, and that is what matters. Both approaches provide responses to this worry, but this supports the claim that a desideratum of a moral theory is that it be applicable. Although Kant does not state this as an imperative, as he does in the other formulations, it is easy enough to put it in that form: Act so that through your maxims you could be a legislator of universal laws. On the former view, by contrast, a rationale is at hand: because your will is, insofar as it is rational, good. For example, Annette Baier argued that morality cannot be captured in a system of rules, and this was a very popular theme amongst early virtue ethicists.
My Moral Philosophy From An Organization Perspective
Whenever there is a question about what assignments are due or when they are due, please remember this syllabus is considered the ruling document. This is because the will is a kind of cause—willing causes action. Fourth, in classical views the distinction between moral and non-moral virtues is not particularly significant. This has led some readers to the conclusion that he is, after all, trying to justify moral requirements by appealing to a fact — our autonomy — that even a moral skeptic would have to recognize. This is a claim he uses not only to distinguish assertoric from problematic imperatives, but also to argue for the imperfect duty of helping others G 4:423 He also appears to rely on this claim in each of his examples. Many see it as introducing more of a social dimension to Kantian morality. These certainly appear to be the words of someone who rejects the idea that what makes actions right is primarily their relationship to what good may come of those actions, someone who rejects outright the act consequentialist form of teleology.
Moral Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
. I believe in the principle and division of labor and empowering employees to come out with their best to increase and sustain productivity. If that is the case, then it seems that deontological approaches are just the ones that are not reductive in this manner. Almost all cultures in the world developed or adopted a system of beliefs and ideological truths that can be defined as Religion. In Case 2 the thief is acting virtuously, whereas in Case 1 the thief only acts to serve their base instincts. .
Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
A personal example of this is growing up in a single parent family introduced me to the idea of death earlier than perhaps normal, but that showed me the fragility and shortness of human life. City and state laws establish the duties of citizens and enforce them with coercive legal power. This is because I am surrounded by people all day every day and I watch how people interact with each other. My effort in this paper is to unravel, examine and bring out my personal moral philosophies and how they affect my actions and decisions on a day to day basis and further down explain the effects of having these philosophies. Rational egoism means furthering your own life according to reality and not by using force against others Liberalistene.
At the basis of morality, Kant argued, is the Categorical Imperative, and imperatives are not truth apt. Philosophers such as R. . But an a posteriori method seems ill-suited to discovering and establishing what we must do whether we feel like doing it or not; surely such a method could only tell us what we actually do. In one sense, it might seem obvious why Kant insists on an a priori method.
. It is without a doubt that many of the human inventions over our evolution have been greatly influenced by the established mechanics of nature and nature still does them to some extent better than our technology. Option 2 holds either there really is no meaningful objective sense, just the subjective sense, or the objective sense is understood in terms of the subjective. The moral law then specifies how we should regard and treat agents who have this special status. Both strategies have faced textual and philosophical hurdles. Three common frameworks are deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics.
Moral values refer to a set of positive standards and principles that tend to guide or determine how a person distinguishes right from wrong, thus regulating his behaviours and choices. The increasing trend of fare trade is an example of impact of marketing ethics. . Hence, determination by natural laws is conceptually incompatible with being free in a negative sense. In following my moral code, I want to be treated with respect, and I want to live life to the fullest by not sitting around a keg and being a beer dreamer, but going out and seeking pleasure. Suppose for the sake of argument we agree with Kant. In some thinkers, ethics is a philosophy derived from ontology Plato, Sartre , in others derived from politics Aristotle.
Reaching the end of this class and semester I can say that my knowledge of these three philosophies has expanded immensely. . Rightness, on the standard reading of Kant, is not grounded in the value of outcomes or character. By allowing the current speaker say what they want to say it allows for the discussion to flow and help fix any confusion that any student may be having during the lecture. Rodriguez PHI 200 Philosophy Mind and Machine Instructor Yelena Gidenko June 3, 2013 ETHICS 2 Is Ethics Natural or Learned Behavior? For example, it arose as a form of criticism of G. But this very intuitiveness can also invite misunderstandings.
We cannot do so, because our own happiness is the very end contained in the maxim of giving ourselves over to pleasure rather than self-development. For example, a moral theory often concerns itself with features of moral psychology relevant to action and character, such as motives, intentions, emotions, and reasons responsiveness. Since it is inconceivable that these two things could exist together, I am forbidden ever to act on the maxim of lying to get money. Therefore, rational agents are free in a negative sense insofar as any practical matter is at issue. Nature can be often seen as a lazy creator as its creations usually take millions of years to be complete and likewise to experience change, it can also be observed that nature like to take the route with the least resistance as well as one that uses the least amount of energy for example the hexagonal shape used by bees to make bee hives is the simplest and least energy consuming shape the bees could use. A second issue that has received considerable attention is whether Kant is a metaethical constructivist or realist.
