John q analysis. John Q. movie review & film summary (2002) 2022-10-13
John q analysis Rating:
5,3/10
1550
reviews
"John Q" is a dramatic film released in 2002 that tells the story of a working-class father named John Quincy Archibald (played by Denzel Washington) who fights to save the life of his critically ill son, Michael (played by Daniel E. Smith). The film raises important issues about the state of healthcare in the United States and the difficulties that many people face in accessing medical treatment.
At the beginning of the film, John and his wife Denise (played by Kimberly Elise) learn that their son Michael has a severe heart condition that requires a heart transplant. However, they are unable to afford the high cost of the procedure, which is not covered by their health insurance. Desperate to save his son's life, John takes matters into his own hands and takes hostages at the hospital where Michael is being treated, demanding that his son be given the transplant.
Throughout the film, John is portrayed as a loving and determined father who is willing to do whatever it takes to save his son's life. Despite the initial hostility of the hostages and the hospital staff, John eventually wins their respect and support as they come to understand the depth of his love for his son and the struggles he has faced in trying to get medical treatment.
One of the central themes of "John Q" is the role of healthcare in society and the ways in which it is affected by economic and political factors. The film highlights the fact that many people in the United States do not have access to affordable healthcare, and that those who do are often forced to choose between their financial well-being and their health. This theme is brought to the forefront when John and Denise are told that their insurance will not cover Michael's transplant and that they must come up with $250,000 in order to pay for the procedure.
Another important theme in "John Q" is the power of individual action and the ability of one person to make a difference. John's actions may seem extreme, but they ultimately lead to a positive outcome for his son and bring attention to the issue of healthcare access. The film suggests that by standing up for what we believe in and taking bold action, we can effect change and bring about positive change in society.
Overall, "John Q" is a thought-provoking and emotionally powerful film that raises important issues about healthcare and the struggles that many people face in accessing medical treatment. It is a poignant reminder of the importance of standing up for what we believe in and the power of individual action to bring about change.
John Q Ethical Dilemma Analysis
However, the odds that the boy would have received the heart would have actually not have ncreased. In the scenario of John Q. The film stars There are two options: a heart transplant, or optimizing Mike's "quality of life" during the "months. The African Americans are likely to need health care attention but are more likely not to receive… What Is The Difference Between Booker T Washington And W. As a result of John not coming up with the complete amount of the transplant the doctors will not perform the surgery. Instead, institutions are focusing on profits first, and ignoring the moral obligations of a person.
Reviewing The Behavioral And Moral Lessons From John Q, A Film By Nick Cassavetes: [Essay Example], 1079 words GradesFixer
Utilitarian ethics is defined as "suggest that we can decide what is morally right or morally wrong by weighing up which of our future possible actions promotes such goodness in our lives and the lives of people more generally. Moreover, results suggest that moral development is highly related to educational attainment and age. The TV ads have already informed you that John Q. The moral conflict in Heinz dilemma is not unfamiliar to society today. As he holds the gun to his own head a second time and prepares to end his life, his wife is told about a woman killed in a car crash, the one from the opening scene, who happens to have the same blood type as Michael, and has been flown to the hospital for organ recovery. John Archibald was faced with the biggest situation to deal with. As John is escorted from the courthouse, Lester proclaims him as a hero, and now-healthy Michael gains eye contact with his father, saying "Dad! He has a moral obligation, as a parent, to do what is necessary to save his son's life.
Is John Q based on a true story? Here are all the details of this 2002 thriller drama
Normally, this is something that would not be accepted by society. The recipients of health care insurance tend to not understand that health insurance does not provide coverage for all medical conditions and procedures, which leaves the recipient feeling angered and helpless when fighting a condition that is not covered. John Q: an Ethical Analys and Review Essay Washington is shown using a grinder as he stands over a tubesheet destined for a steam generator for a nuclear power generating facility. He should have done that to let the public know that he was being treated unfairly. Ethically, to the question of how scarce resources should be allocated, there is no easy or definite answer. However, the institutions within the movie provide an ethical dilemma, while reflecting the reality within our current society. This makes the reader and Jane ignore the fact that he is handsome, blonde, and blue-eyed.
His motives are good when he takes a group of hostages and has a gun saying he will kill everyone if his son is not helped. He also uses a telephone to communicate with people outside of the hospital, most often the police. This resolution contributes to his hardships sculpting selflessness and integrity into his independent nature. It would be incredibly difficult for her to see John for a few minutes after a long time apart and say he can sacrifice himself for the greater good. As he holds the gun to his own head a second time and prepares to end his life, his wife is told about a woman killed in a car crash, the one from the opening scene, who happens to have the same blood type as Michael, and has been flown to the hospital for organ recovery. John reveals his intention to die by suicide to save Michael with his own heart, and also reveals that his gun was empty all along. University of North Carolina.
Dramatic Analysis Of The Film John Q: [Essay Example], 1210 words GradesFixer
Thus, if a large number of American viewers watch the film, they might associate with John Archibald to such an extent that they agree with his acts of vigilante justice. Franks persuasion worked when john agreed to let some of the hostages go on condition that frank had an hour to get Mike on the list before john started killing hostages. John has chosen to put the hospital on lockdown by taking the emergency room hostage. The unfortunate incident of John's health insurance should be basis for the grounds of a lawsuit. Rebecca Payne, who was responsible of delivering the unfortunate news of their son to John Q and his wife, did this insensitively. The unbelievable decision of John Q in killing himself to donate his heart to his son also ethically impacted the life of the cardiac surgeon.
This is difficult because many families and patients find themselves in similar situations to the Archibalds. National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Frank Grimes makes contact with John, who demands Payne put Michael's name on the organ transplant list. John Q movie analysis , Sample of Essays He is out of control, but has a view of the overall picture. It was made clear that without a heart transplant, the boy would die. Such action can be consider as unethical by some, but since such disguise is for the general good to create a happy society, the utilitarian would support such an act, and so is the deontologist. Film Synopsis John Q is a story that tells the difficulties of the healthcare system failing John's family and the action a father takes to do whatever is necessary to save his son's life.
This ethics concept can be explored more through the examination of other questions of justice, such as if healthcare resources should be available to as many people as possible or ensuring that all people receive resources equally, or specifically the examination of who should or should not receive a transplant. All John would have liked was for his boss and the people at the hospital to explain the different medical care services they have and try in the there best power to give Michael the transplant, so he gets an extra chance of living. John ignores the fact that there are other people on the recipient list that are no-less deserving than his son Mike. John and Denise wife then goes to numerous health clinics to receive aid, but were denied because John was over qualified. John and Denise struggle to raise the money and the hospital prepares to send Michael home to die when the couple exhausts all their opportunities and they still come up short. In the nick of time, she stops John Q from ending his life, and miraculously, Michael receives his heart and is saved.
The Movie John Q: Ethical Dilemmas: [Essay Example], 1445 words GradesFixer
Eventually, John came to the apex of the movie telling the surgeon to take his own heart out of his chest and give it to his dying son. This created the impression that John was dependent on the young man, which was not necessarily so. She had no value of life and was willing to throw someone's away that she could have given hope back to. John Quincy Archibald and his wife Denise witness their young son Michael collapse at his baseball game. No one can relate to how he feels. He is not a good role model. To the same effect, the usefulness of the mentally ill or elderly can be perceived to be lessened because they have less years or intellectual contributions to make to society.
As night falls, Michael is removed from the ICU and brought to the ER in exchange for the sniper's release, while Denise waits at the police command post. A parent that has devoted years of aid and care can become overwhelmed by a mood of desperation. At present, the review of various literatures on past predominant moral developmental theories suggests room for further exploration, and sets the stage for modern research on morality. The borrowed money from friends and neighbors could have also provided much good in their respective lives. Following that, children from seven to ten years old is in a stage of transition, showing some features of heteronomous morality and autonomous morality stages. It appeared that men based their judgement more on abstract ideas while women on care and concern for relationships Martin et al. When we have a lack of health literacy, the outcome can tend to be poor DeWalt, 2008.
