Opposing cloning. Free Essay: Against Human Cloning 2022-10-06
Opposing cloning Rating:
Cloning is the process of creating a genetically identical copy of a living organism or tissue. While the technology behind cloning has advanced significantly in recent years, it remains a controversial and highly debated topic. In this essay, I will argue that cloning should not be pursued or allowed due to the potential ethical, social, and scientific consequences.
One major concern with cloning is the ethical implications. Cloning raises a number of moral and philosophical questions, including the rights and dignity of the clones themselves. It is not clear whether clones, who are essentially copies of existing organisms, would have the same rights as non-cloned individuals. There is also the question of whether it is morally acceptable to create and manipulate life in this way. Additionally, cloning raises the possibility of creating "designer babies," where parents could choose the traits of their children, leading to further societal inequalities.
Another concern with cloning is the potential social consequences. Cloning could lead to a society where people are no longer seen as unique and valuable individuals, but rather as interchangeable copies. This could have negative impacts on personal identity and relationships, as well as contribute to a lack of diversity within a population. Cloning could also lead to a future where people are no longer valued for their abilities and contributions, but rather for their genetic makeup.
From a scientific standpoint, cloning is still a relatively new and untested technology. There are many unknowns and potential risks involved with cloning, including the possibility of creating genetically flawed or unhealthy clones. Cloning also relies on a small number of "elite" individuals to be cloned, leading to a lack of genetic diversity within a population and increasing the risk of genetic disorders.
In conclusion, while cloning may offer potential benefits in certain situations, the ethical, social, and scientific consequences outweigh the potential benefits. It is important for society to carefully consider the implications of cloning and to continue to invest in ethical and sustainable approaches to scientific advancement.
The Pros & Cons of Cloning
I think it raises very important questions. Obviously, Mombaerts says, Dr. What this means is that the stem cells do not last long and can not be distinguished from other cells. In its most recent round, public sentiment has been focused. It is difficult to say whether things will work exactly as we expect them to.
Reproductive cloning would foster an understanding of children, and of people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to possess specific characteristics. Leon Kass is involved, professor of ethics at Princeton, had some scientific opinion. There are only slight differences in support according to political party, but liberals 64% and moderates 62% are much more supportive than are conservatives 44%. The next argument deals with the …show more content… More specifically, I find to of the arguments leaning against cloning most persuasive. The arguments concerning the personhood of a zygote or an egg that had just been entered by the sperm has nothing to do with the cloning debate. On the other hand, I believe that if same sex couples want a child, then adoption should be a better option as mentioned above.
Reasons For and Against Human Cloning « Phil for Humanity
This reason is self defeating; because as scientists learn more, cloning humans has the possibility of becoming safer than naturally developing embryos by replacing randomized risks and genetic defects. That is a consequence that we have to be concerned with. Wade, how can there be a law against stem cell research and against cloning? Most parents learn to communicate their expectations about their children in a moderate and ultimately positive way. Faster recovery from traumatic injury. Among the arguments presented, some were persuasive, and some were not.
We are glad today to present a particular focus on human cloning. Cloning can create genetical defects and nowhere does it specify that the diseases you already have wont transfer over to your clone. Could you imagine what it might feel like to know that you were a clone of someone else 's being? We have been in the midst of what can only be called a biogenetic revolution in the recent past. Some people seem not to realize the negative aspects that cloning would bring into a world which is already suffering. The humanness of a person does not depend on his or her state of independence, level of perfection, or virtue, or viability.
Here we seem to be subverting that whole discussion. Our nuclear arsenal is a witness to what we can do to the entire world and how we can destroy it. The success of cloning in rhesus macaque monkeysalmost twenty years ago 1999 also provided essential support to the hypothesis that humans can be possibly cloned. God reached down under His throne of glory and picked up a handful of earth and fashioned man. Why would you want to replace a loved one in the first place? That permission is not given in Islamic law.
If you cloned yourself, the resulting child would be neither your son or daughter nor your twin brother or sister, but a new category of human being: your clone. Again, I want to repeat, it is I believe to be a smokescreen to talk about cloning a live baby when the interest really is maintaining a religious belief of humanhood at the time of zygote formation. That we are in fact going to have a regulated regime in which public policy seeks to build consensus on community values. We are required to do research to save human life. The Ethical Issues — A Gist ~ Cloning does have its share of advantages.
Mombaerts attended the meeting in Washington and spoke about his work in the field of therapeutic cloning in mice. Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. In the poll, roughly two-thirds of Americans feel human cloning will not be legal in 2025 and six in 10 do not feel human cloning will be commonplace in 2025. ~ Embryonic stem cells can be cloned to produce tissues or organs to replace or repair the damaged ones. Therefore, we cannot discuss this without taking the family — institution of family, society as a whole and questioning those values that are important. Nigel Cameron alluded to, which is if something can be done, it should be done. We put them together differently.
Stem cell research would fall under the purview of therapeutic cloning. And an international array of scientists--including Ian Wilmut, the director of the Scottish project that cloned Dolly the sheep in 1997--stood staunchly opposed. Human society can accept or reject any proposed technology on its own merits. Should we use human embryos or stem cells or both? So those two reasons were, I guess, first and foremost in our minds as we began looking at this issue. It may seem like many advantages could take place in the scientific community if cloning were to be legalized, but only resulting in having only a few benefits and many downfalls. Especially in Jewish law, we know about fences about the law. How Do You Feel About Human Cloning? No one wants to make a human being.
Many people are opposed to this issue due to their religious beliefs, because they feel man will be replacing the higher being as the creator of creatures on this Earth. Even if cloning were safe, it would be impossible to allow reproductive cloning for lesbians or gay men without making it generally available to all. That means I should recognize your rights on me. I guess the second reason, and perhaps more compelling to us, and this came out in the testimony yesterday at the hearing we held, is that the NIH guidelines regulating stem cell research are coming to be known — the guidelines are based on a rather disingenuous philosophy. I know for sure, like you know for sure, and like Sachedina knows for sure.
Human Cloning: The Pros and Cons Highlight Its Risk
What Do Americans Think the Future Holds for Cloning? Cloning is one of the issues under the intricate umbrella of biotechnology. While it will always unethical to kill another human being to save another person, what if the cloned human body replacement did not have a brain and was intentionally designed that way from the beginning? It 's not something most humans look forward to for themselves or for anyone they love but inevitably one day it will approach us all. Along with the arguments that I find persuasive, I have also found some flaws with the idea of cloning. In my partner 's constructive speech, it brought up the fact that cloning animal models of diseases is very beneficial because then scientists can research about these diseases to make a treatment for it. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine.