Cloning is the process of creating a genetically identical copy of a living organism or tissue. While the technology behind cloning has advanced significantly in recent years, it remains a controversial and highly debated topic. In this essay, I will argue that cloning should not be pursued or allowed due to the potential ethical, social, and scientific consequences.
One major concern with cloning is the ethical implications. Cloning raises a number of moral and philosophical questions, including the rights and dignity of the clones themselves. It is not clear whether clones, who are essentially copies of existing organisms, would have the same rights as non-cloned individuals. There is also the question of whether it is morally acceptable to create and manipulate life in this way. Additionally, cloning raises the possibility of creating "designer babies," where parents could choose the traits of their children, leading to further societal inequalities.
Another concern with cloning is the potential social consequences. Cloning could lead to a society where people are no longer seen as unique and valuable individuals, but rather as interchangeable copies. This could have negative impacts on personal identity and relationships, as well as contribute to a lack of diversity within a population. Cloning could also lead to a future where people are no longer valued for their abilities and contributions, but rather for their genetic makeup.
From a scientific standpoint, cloning is still a relatively new and untested technology. There are many unknowns and potential risks involved with cloning, including the possibility of creating genetically flawed or unhealthy clones. Cloning also relies on a small number of "elite" individuals to be cloned, leading to a lack of genetic diversity within a population and increasing the risk of genetic disorders.
In conclusion, while cloning may offer potential benefits in certain situations, the ethical, social, and scientific consequences outweigh the potential benefits. It is important for society to carefully consider the implications of cloning and to continue to invest in ethical and sustainable approaches to scientific advancement.
Human Cloning: Religious Perspectives
Reproductive cloning would foster an understanding of children, and of people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to possess specific characteristics. Leon Kass is involved, professor of ethics at Princeton, had some scientific opinion. There are only slight differences in support according to political party, but liberals 64% and moderates 62% are much more supportive than are conservatives 44%. The next argument deals with the …show more content… More specifically, I find to of the arguments leaning against cloning most persuasive. The arguments concerning the personhood of a zygote or an egg that had just been entered by the sperm has nothing to do with the cloning debate. On the other hand, I believe that if same sex couples want a child, then adoption should be a better option as mentioned above.
Arguments Against Cloning
Mombaerts attended the meeting in Washington and spoke about his work in the field of therapeutic cloning in mice. Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. In the poll, roughly two-thirds of Americans feel human cloning will not be legal in 2025 and six in 10 do not feel human cloning will be commonplace in 2025. ~ Embryonic stem cells can be cloned to produce tissues or organs to replace or repair the damaged ones. Therefore, we cannot discuss this without taking the family — institution of family, society as a whole and questioning those values that are important. Nigel Cameron alluded to, which is if something can be done, it should be done. We put them together differently.
Americans Oppose Idea of Human Cloning
Stem cell research would fall under the purview of therapeutic cloning. And an international array of scientists--including Ian Wilmut, the director of the Scottish project that cloned Dolly the sheep in 1997--stood staunchly opposed. Human society can accept or reject any proposed technology on its own merits. Should we use human embryos or stem cells or both? So those two reasons were, I guess, first and foremost in our minds as we began looking at this issue. It may seem like many advantages could take place in the scientific community if cloning were to be legalized, but only resulting in having only a few benefits and many downfalls. Especially in Jewish law, we know about fences about the law. How Do You Feel About Human Cloning? No one wants to make a human being.
Top 7 Pros and Cons of Cloning
Many people are opposed to this issue due to their religious beliefs, because they feel man will be replacing the higher being as the creator of creatures on this Earth. Even if cloning were safe, it would be impossible to allow reproductive cloning for lesbians or gay men without making it generally available to all. That means I should recognize your rights on me. I guess the second reason, and perhaps more compelling to us, and this came out in the testimony yesterday at the hearing we held, is that the NIH guidelines regulating stem cell research are coming to be known — the guidelines are based on a rather disingenuous philosophy. I know for sure, like you know for sure, and like Sachedina knows for sure.
