Leave it in hindi. लीव इट का मतलब 2022-10-25

Graffiti is a highly controversial and polarizing topic, with some people considering it to be a form of artistic expression and others viewing it as nothing more than vandalism. In this essay, we will examine both sides of the argument to determine whether graffiti should be considered art or vandalism.

On one hand, proponents of graffiti argue that it is a legitimate form of art. They point out that graffiti has a long history dating back to ancient civilizations, where it was often used to convey important messages or tell stories. Graffiti can also be seen as a way for artists to express their creativity and share their ideas with the world. Many graffiti artists take great care in planning and executing their works, using a variety of techniques and styles to create visually striking and thought-provoking pieces.

However, those who view graffiti as vandalism argue that it is a destructive and illegal activity that damages public and private property. Graffiti often appears on buildings, trains, and other public structures without the permission of the property owner, and removing it can be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, some graffiti is used to spread hate speech or gang-related messages, which can create a sense of fear and unrest in a community.

In conclusion, the question of whether graffiti is art or vandalism is highly subjective and depends on one's personal beliefs and values. While some may see it as a legitimate form of artistic expression, others view it as a destructive and illegal activity. Ultimately, it is important to respect the rights of property owners and ensure that graffiti is not used to spread hate or cause harm to others.