12 angry men conflict analysis. Twelve Angry Men Analysis Essay 2022-10-28
12 angry men conflict analysis Rating:
4,7/10
892
reviews
12 Angry Men is a classic film that explores the inner workings of a jury as they deliberate a verdict in a murder trial. Throughout the film, various conflicts arise as the jurors attempt to reach a unanimous decision. These conflicts can be analyzed through the lens of interpersonal, intrapersonal, and group dynamics.
One major conflict in the film is the interpersonal conflict between Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, and Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb. Juror 8 is the protagonist of the film and is the only juror who initially votes "not guilty." He is calm, logical, and open-minded, while Juror 3 is hot-headed, closed-minded, and emotionally invested in the case. Throughout the film, Juror 3 becomes increasingly frustrated with Juror 8's refusal to change his vote, leading to several heated arguments between the two men.
Another conflict in the film is the intrapersonal conflict within Juror 8. Throughout the deliberation, Juror 8 grapples with his own doubts and biases as he tries to remain objective and consider all the evidence. He must also confront his own preconceived notions about the defendant and the justice system. This internal conflict ultimately leads Juror 8 to become more open-minded and willing to listen to the perspectives of his fellow jurors.
Finally, there is a group dynamic conflict within the jury as a whole. Initially, most of the jurors are convinced of the defendant's guilt and are eager to reach a quick verdict. However, as Juror 8 raises doubts and presents alternative interpretations of the evidence, the group dynamic shifts and the jurors become more divided. This conflict is exacerbated by the presence of strong personalities and differing viewpoints within the group.
In conclusion, the film 12 Angry Men illustrates various conflicts that arise within a group as they try to reach a unanimous decision. These conflicts include interpersonal conflict between Juror 8 and Juror 3, intrapersonal conflict within Juror 8, and group dynamic conflict within the jury as a whole. Through these conflicts, the film demonstrates the challenges and complexities of decision-making and the importance of remaining open-minded and considering all perspectives.
Twelve angry men analysis childhealthpolicy.vumc.org
Juror 7 even changes his vote to not guilty, if only to end the meeting earlier, avoiding addressing the issue. It is about a boy who is on trial and is accused of knifing his father to death. On the other hand, Davis's leadership can be explained by the great men theory because he uses his skills to lead the jury to discuss every aspect of the case. The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. He's big, you know.
Davis to try and convince the other jury members that the defendant might not be guilty by using cooperative argumentation, claim, evidence, warrant, facts, etc. The jury must deliberate until a unanimous decision is reached. This setting took place In a New York courthouse. Foreman lead others to make an agreed decision. The conflict in this movie can be taken into the analysis by the Circle of Conflict Model in the book The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict Moore, 1986. Task oriented conflict refers to a disagreement between members of any group due to different approaches on how to view objective issues.
Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies. One juror had a personal connection with the case. While these conflicts themselves might have held the jurors back, the competition approach to these sources of conflict moved the group in the right direction. Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations. The movie concentrates on jury members' decision about a boy who is accused of killing his father with a switch knife, and his life depends on the decision of the jury. He is less concerned and less committed in this murder case.
Communication in 12 Angry Men Character Analysis Essay Example
The rest of the jury then begins to persuade the architect that the accused is actually guilty. Juror 1 was appointed the foreman of the group but did not have much interaction with the group as a leader, he seems to listen more to the other jurors than providing his comments or opinions, his behavior causes a shift in CONCLUSION We see the power of task-oriented leadership, the cycle of the changing role of leadership, and great effort it takes to change a random collection of individuals into a winning team. One man, in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. Juror 7 the Withdrawer kept referring to his baseball game and was distracted throughout the group interaction. Eventually, he gains support, and others understand that their first opinion might be wrong as their arguments are confuted by observations and deep analysis. Once the problem is identified, the questioning spirit can again drive a different way of thinking toward the exact problem.
The presentation we have designed shows the relationship between parts of the movie and the concepts in our textbook. Under the situation in this movie, no one knows each other before is meeting, they have a time pressure to make the judgment, and it is attainable for the jury to have difficulty connecting with each other and therefore become social loafers. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. Conflict was very evident throughout the movie. Johnson 2005 give us some suggestion to avoid this problem which are listening, engaging in dialogue, and utilizing productive conflict will increase the chances that groups will come up with a better solution because members have examined their assumptions and considered more viewpoints and possible solutions. Conflict styles are patterned responses, or clusters of behavior that people use in conflict.
We need to be careful to properly assess the truth of our own and others arguments to make sure they have valid Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Social loafing is refer to the concept that people are prone to exert less effort on a task if they are in a group versus when they work alone. Thoughtful the impact of imbalances at intervals circle forces all parties to first identify and diagnose the source of conflict, and then parley for resolution. As the movie closes the not guilty verdict is handed down. He is initiative when he asks the men to discuss the case in further detail. The prosecutors had several eyewitness testimonies, and the evidence, a knife that they needed to convict the 18-year-old boy.
Under this condition, analyzing and assessing are less important, and decision making becomes more unreliable. Like Socrates, Fonda is willing to admit not knowing, willing to ask questions and search for the truth. Dr Hebbard, through your experience, How do we change this behavior under pressure, abnormal circumstances and maintain consistency? In my opinion some of the counter evidence presented was kind of weak, but the whole point of this essay is to show the trail of evidence to lead the jurors to a reasonable doubt. Consistent with Janis 1972 , some key factors that aggravate groupthink, according to the theory, are high initial cohesiveness, directive Don't use plagiarized sources. At the beginning of the movie, only Davis thoroughly evaluates the accuracy of evidence. Juror 10 the joker he was always disrupting the group.
Analysis of a Small Group Communication in 12 Angry Men
But she also implies there are more; this picture is just an indicator of what lies ahead. Three assessments were performed and listed are the results. This disturbance serves two purposes. Negotiating success can be attributed to the negotiator understanding his or her personality while being aware of the personalities of others Budjac Corvette, 2007. Immigration and diversity seem to have plagued the world now more than ever and it is no surprise that the business world has been changed tremendously.
