Using animals for scientific research has long been a controversial topic, with passionate advocates on both sides of the debate. On one hand, some argue that animal testing is necessary for the advancement of scientific knowledge and the development of new medical treatments. On the other hand, others argue that it is unethical to subject animals to often painful and distressing experiments, and that there are alternative methods that can be used instead.
Those who support the use of animals in scientific research argue that it has led to numerous important medical breakthroughs and has saved countless lives. For example, the development of vaccines for diseases such as polio and rabies, as well as the development of chemotherapy drugs for cancer treatment, were made possible through animal testing. Additionally, animal testing is often used to test the safety and effectiveness of new drugs before they are tested in humans, which helps to ensure that they are safe for human use.
However, those who oppose animal testing argue that it is unethical to subject animals to often painful and distressing experiments. They point out that animals, particularly those used in research, are often subjected to confinement, deprivation, and other forms of stress, and that they may suffer physical harm or even death as a result of these experiments. They argue that it is not justifiable to cause suffering to animals in the pursuit of scientific knowledge or medical progress.
There are also alternative methods that can be used instead of animal testing. For example, in vitro testing, which uses cells or tissues grown in a laboratory, can be used to test the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. In silico modeling, which uses computer simulations to predict the effects of a new drug, can also be used as an alternative to animal testing. Both of these methods are less expensive and less time-consuming than animal testing, and they do not involve causing harm to living beings.
In conclusion, the use of animals in scientific research is a complex and controversial issue. While it is true that animal testing has led to important medical breakthroughs and has saved lives, it is also true that it is unethical to subject animals to often painful and distressing experiments. Alternative methods such as in vitro testing and in silico modeling can be used instead of animal testing, and these methods may be more cost-effective and less time-consuming. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to use animals in scientific research should be based on a careful weighing of the potential benefits and the ethical concerns involved.
Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing Example
In my opinion, the benefits far outweigh the costs, and thus I believe that animals should be used for research purposes. N2 asphyxiation is the optimum method due to it does not cause stress due to it is impossible to detect as there is no biological response to high levels of N2 as the atmosphere is 70% N2. Through this practice we have been able to literally cure disease, find new therapy for illness, ensure the safety of medicine, and evaluate medical procedures before they are ever used on humans. Others argue that there are alternatives to animal testing that are just as effective, if not more so. This is because there are many differences between species, such as metabolism and genetic make-up.
Essay On Animals In Scientific Research
It is therefore clear that use of animals in scientific research cannot stop for any reason. Rabbits are also still used for the Draize eye irritancy test which can leave the rabbits blind. In a recent count, it was determined that 8815 animals were being used for research at MSU, 8503 of them were rats, mice, hamsters, and gerbils. They overlook the idea that animals are hurt and thus suffer tremendously. I do see the point of view that for many years science has made some breakthroughs with the use of animal testing, however, within the 21st century there are more alternatives companies can use that will, in my opinion, be more ethically source-able, environmentally friendly and more humane that will not allow the animals to suffer.
Should Animals be Used for Research: Argumentative Essay: Free Essay Example, 2785 words
There are plenty of people out there protecting animal rights and advocating for animals that are used for testing. This is because of the terrible care that animals are being put through, people debate about whether animal testing should happen at all. Another animal-based test is for use of the military, the military every year shoot, stab and kill over 10,000 live animals in training exercises. First, the skin and eye irritancy is inflicted in perfectly healthy animals and then used to find the cause. In this article, Aysha reveals the validity and unreliability of testing on animals due to the differences in a growing and developing body compared to a helpless non-human animal with a different body make-up. Federal law shows us how little protection animals have, numerous recalled or discontinued medications are proof that research on animals to predict effects on the human body is highly unreliable. The two governments use animals as a precaution to lessen the number of human illnesses and fatalities during human clinical trials, which saves time and resources for the medical world and the consumers.
