Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a process used to extract oil and natural gas from shale formations deep underground. It involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the ground at high pressure to create fractures in the rock, allowing the oil and gas to flow more freely and be pumped to the surface.
There are strong arguments both for and against fracking. Proponents of fracking argue that it can provide a domestic source of energy that is relatively cheap and abundant. It can also reduce our dependence on foreign sources of oil and gas, which can be politically and economically unstable. Fracking has also been credited with boosting local economies by creating jobs and increasing tax revenues.
However, there are also significant concerns about the environmental impacts of fracking. The process uses large amounts of water, which can strain local water supplies and lead to drought. The chemicals used in the fracking process can also contaminate both surface and ground water, posing a risk to human health and the environment. There are also concerns about air pollution from the burning of natural gas and the release of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere.
Another major concern about fracking is the potential for earthquakes. The process can cause small, largely insignificant earthquakes, but there have also been instances of more significant seismic activity that can be harmful to communities.
In conclusion, the debate over fracking is complex and multifaceted. While it can provide economic and energy benefits, it also has the potential to cause significant environmental and health impacts. It is important to carefully consider the costs and benefits of fracking and to implement safeguards to minimize any negative impacts. Ultimately, the decision to use fracking should be based on a balanced assessment of all of these factors.
Since the increase in the use of natural gas rather than coal, the combustion of natural gas has produced fewer harmful particles in the air. It uses liquefied propane gel instead of water to help release the natural gas Nearing, Brino 2011. For instance, it is argued that the technology results to pollution of underground water sources, air pollution, global warming, use of enormous amount of water at production sites, and encouraging the reluctance of firms and government promoting usage of renewable sources of energy. Fracking is a type of hydraulic fracturing of shale or bedrocks utilizing high pressures of water, sand and additives in order to obtain natural gas and other petroleum products from underground. Fracking Criticism 1632 Words 7 Pages FRACKING AND ITS CRITICISM Since the mid-80s, The First Nations and their leaders have raised numerous concerns about the failure of the government and industries in Canada to properly consult them before developing any of their lands.
The Gas Land movie and the Promised Land movie have been used by the media to paint a bad picture of this process by scenes showing that the hydraulic fracturing process contaminates water and is an environmental threat. Shots fired, officer vehicles set ablaze, and groups of protesters pepper sprayed; all hell broke loose on the date of October 17, 2013 when the Royal Canadian Mounted Police RCMP showed up to stop anti-fracking protesters in New Brunswick, Canada. Not to mention water intensity is lower for fracking than other fossil fuels. Then the mixture is moved into the blending truck. S has the world 's largest natural gas reserves in its shale deposits, making it a perfect candidate for fracking.
Having observed that it successfully boosted production of oil and gas wells, it was quickly adopted and commercially developed. While most energy companies are conscientious and put forth every effort to make fracking safe, without oversight, some companies are reeking havoc on communities, individuals, and nature. However, opponents claim that when machines malfunction, it can be catastrophic for local residents by contaminating drinking water and polluting the air. In recent years, people in America have become more concerned with the environment, and fracking has been a topic of frequent debate. Fracking is a way to get natural gas; natural gas is a cleaner source of energy. But once this keeps happening, it can result in much larger earthquakes.
This can have a big effect on those that rely on wells for drinking water. The main subject of the protest is the land itself; the land is a little ways away from the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. One of the worst energy sources we use is coal. The arguments for both sides are compelling, but the environment doesn't need yet another problem to deal with. This is the second release of the poll, a twice-annual national online survey of energy issues. Many countries simply do not have the wealth for the harvesting of renewable resources such as wind, solar, and nuclear.
Why Fracking Should be Banned (Argumentative Essay)
The fluid enters the deep-rock and makes it possible to have natural gas, petroleum and brine flow up. Methane is a greenhouse gas that has horrible effects on the environment. By eliminating the use of fossil fuels, and by using clean energy sources. For those that are not familiar with hydrofracking, a brief explanation is necessary. The purpose of fracking is to obtain natural gases and oils. There is a lot of controversy over whether or not fracking is beneficial or not. Some of which are fossil fuels.
. These natural gases are used for many sources of energy throughout the world. It is long past the time where we need to recognize these attacks and stand united in helping those who have been hurt so much across the course of history. Natural gases are hydrocarbon. This process is used in many wells in the United States. Furthermore water, sand, chemicals and other substances are injected into the rock at a high pressure, in order to allow the gas in the rock to flow out and up to the top of the fracking wells. Research has shown that the U.
Paris: Editions Technip press. Assist the oil and gas industry in the safe management and disposal of drilling fluids; Support effective groundwater monitoring and remediation; and Provide practices that facilitate proper reinjection of produced well fluids. There is a House Bill known as FRAC in the United States which regulates the hydraulic fracturing process; also known as Fracking Responsibility and Awareness to Chemical Act. After lowering the torpedo and exploding it you would then then fill the borehole with water and the production of oil from wells greatly increased. Tomas Wiltowski, director of the coal research center also believes that the fracking process is safe and should be encouraged. Fracking Argumentative Analysis 150 Words 1 Pages A third way that fracking is a useful resource is that It lowers energy cost. This is because there has been a moratorium placed on Hydraulic Fracturing until further notice.
. This is causing a water shortage for many homeowners across the globe. From meeting energy needs to creating jobs and helping the economy, natural gas is an invisible miracle. The technology, which was invented in the past few decades, has been contributed to an increase in the supply of gas and oil globally. According to Weinhold 156 , this high demand of natural gas can only be met by the hydraulic fracturing process, which produces natural gas that does not emit lots of carbon.
Since the discovery of natural gas that lie beneath the hills of Dalton, Georgia, fracking companies are progressively seeking ways to drill and explore the fields of northwest Georgia that they predict will bring upon liquid riches. Therefore, media should stop insisting that hydraulic fracturing process poses environmental dangers and should rather encourage its use in order to produce more natural gas to avoid air pollution caused by conventional gases. In this paper, I will argue that this argument fails because there are many consequences of fracking and thus, still poses a real threat to the people and the environment. Without this process very large amounts of natural gas would be left underneath the ground, never to be used. Hydraulic Fracturing Argumentative Essay 322 Words 2 Pages The potential economical and cleaner energy growth is what drives you to use unsafe, and poorly regulated growth, which is fracking. Many companies use this process because it is very cost effective, even though it may not be the safest. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them.
Fracking Argumentative Essay Examples That Really Inspire
So is hydrofracking safe? The FLQ And The October Crisis In Canada 1043 Words 5 Pages Their plan to start a revolution to free Québec had ultimately failed. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. Public health is at a profound risk while fracking is being practiced. Natural gases have also been proven to be more cleaner and more efficient source than coal. The demand for natural gas in the United States has increased in the last decades and can only be met through the hydraulic fracturing process or else there will be little gas shortage in the country. Therefore as the media claims that it causes environmental danger, this should be put into consideration. In New Brunswick, as in other areas of North America where fracking is possible, there is heated debate on whether the investment would be made in this industry.