The "Nestle Kills Babies" pamphlet is a piece of propaganda that has been circulating for decades. It accuses Nestle, a multinational food and beverage company, of causing infant deaths in developing countries through its marketing of infant formula. The pamphlet claims that Nestle promotes the use of infant formula over breastfeeding, leading to malnutrition and death in babies.
There is some truth to the claims made in the "Nestle Kills Babies" pamphlet. Nestle has faced criticism in the past for its marketing practices in developing countries, particularly in regards to infant formula. In the 1970s and 1980s, Nestle was accused of aggressively marketing infant formula to mothers in developing countries, often with misleading information about the superiority of formula over breastfeeding. This led to a decline in breastfeeding rates and an increase in infant mortality in some countries.
However, it is important to note that the claims made in the "Nestle Kills Babies" pamphlet are exaggerated and misleading. While Nestle did engage in unethical marketing practices in the past, the company has since made efforts to improve its practices and increase transparency. Nestle has adopted the World Health Organization's International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes, which sets guidelines for the marketing of infant formula, and has implemented a series of policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the code.
It is also important to recognize that infant mortality is a complex issue with many contributing factors. Poverty, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and lack of access to clean water and proper sanitation are all major contributors to infant mortality. Blaming Nestle for infant deaths oversimplifies the issue and ignores the many other factors that contribute to infant mortality.
In conclusion, while Nestle has faced criticism in the past for its marketing practices, the "Nestle Kills Babies" pamphlet is an exaggeration of the truth. Nestle has made efforts to improve its practices and comply with the World Health Organization's International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. It is important to recognize that infant mortality is a complex issue with many contributing factors, and to address the issue, we must consider a range of solutions rather than blaming a single company.
Remembering the baby killer booklet and Nestle libel trial
It encourages poor mothers to abandon breast feeding for a more expensive and ultimately less healthful alternative. Far from an isolated occurrence, this problem has been documented in many other poorer nations. We have therefore implemented industry-leading policies on responsible marketing of breast-milk substitutes. Women, who traditionally grow the food, are forced to take paying jobs or begin raising primary cash crops. KLIM is good for your baby and your growing children too. . Our values are rooted in respect.
. Directions on a tin of DAWN milk powder, produced by a nationalized company in Zambia, are a startling reminder of the difference between people vs. The result is extreme malnutrition. A Chilean doctor tells of his western-oriented medical education: It was like a chemistry class or perhaps cookery. Find out more by reading our year report.
And ladies, all of this comes to you at absolutely no cost! The use or misuse of the infant formula may lead to child death for various reasons which include negligence to certain important facts regarding the usage or simple ignorance of the mother or the feeder. NIFAC recommended several clarifi cations for the in- structions that it believed would better interpret ambiguous areas of the code; in October 1982, Nestlé accepted those recommenda- tions and issued revised instructions to fi eld personnel. Molenaar, University of San Diego. In 1972, another PAG meeting addressed infant formula marketing. Join The Campaign Active groups in more than a dozen cities are working to spread the Nestle boycott. The Policy and Procedures have been expressing our recognition that the WHO Code is an important instrument to protect infant health, particularly in countries with poor sanitary, economic and social conditions.
In 1994, the WHA Resolution 47. Acting on WHO recommendations, Nestlé consulted with fi rms experienced and expert in developing and fi eld testing educational materials, so that it could ensure that those materials met the code. To date, Nestlé is one of only three BMS manufacturers that are part of the index. Thus, this led to the death of millions of child infant death. They show, for each article of the WHO Code, how Nestlé practically applies the rules in its daily sales and marketing activities. Nestlé supports the optimal nutrition for mothers and babies during the first 1000 days of life.
Inform them that you are supporting the Nestle boycott. You see, the milk supply is regulated by what the baby takes. With some blogs, you will have to add the link as a separate line. The full Nestlé response is accessible on the Download the More information is also available on. She wants to provide that which will make the child strong and healthy.
The WHO International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes the Code or the WHO Code , was adopted at the 34th World Health Assembly in 1981 as a public recommendation to UN member states. However, the controversy continued. Since then, the Policy and Procedures which we continually update have been mandatory for all Nestlé employees and any third party acting with our authorization. For over 20 years, beginning with a Pan American Health Organization al- legation, Nestlé has been directly or indirectly charged with in- volvement in the death of Third World infants. Also in 1975, we created the International Council of Infant Food Industries ICIFI with seven other infant formula manufacturers. No preparation is necessary.
In 1974 a British journalist published a report that suggested that powdered-formula manufacturers contributed to the death of Third World infants by hard-selling their products to people incapable of using them properly. By 1981, the 34th World Health Assemblyhad adopted Resolution WHA34. . Nestlé carefully investigated these criticisms when they applied to us and we implemented corrective actions whenever it was necessary. All its products carry a statement that breast feeding is best. Nestlé targets pregnant women, mothers of babies and young children and health workers to promote its products and boost its sales.
The manufacturers were criticized for rolling out marketing strategies suitable for developed countries without adapting them to the context of low- and middle-income countries. Nestle promoted Neslac with the help of posters, gift offer and advertisements in all types of media. By the time the infant reaches six months, his feeding costs can consume up to 60% of an average income in many countries, or nearly 80% in extremely poor countries such as Guatemala. In Defense of Nestle The key ethical issues to the substitution of the breast-milk feed, there are two main key points to discuss in this part, and to show how the company thinks that the infant formula is not unethical. In 2006, the European Commission adopted the Directive on Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula that Nestlé implemented in its marketing practices in the whole European Union. We track our achievements each year and publish the results in our Creating Shared Value progress report. The case originally appeared in the fi fth edition of this text.
