Pros of paying college athletes. Paying College Athletes Pros and Cons 2022-10-13
Pros of paying college athletes Rating:
Paying college athletes has been a controversial topic for many years, with advocates arguing that it would provide much-needed financial support for student athletes and opponents arguing that it would blur the lines between amateur and professional sports. However, there are several pros to paying college athletes that make it a compelling idea.
One of the main arguments in favor of paying college athletes is that it would provide them with much-needed financial support. Many college athletes are under a great deal of financial strain, as they are required to devote a significant amount of time to their sport and may not have time to work part-time jobs to help cover their expenses. This can be especially difficult for athletes from low-income families, who may not have the financial resources to support their education and athletic pursuits. By providing a financial stipend to college athletes, universities could help alleviate this financial burden and allow athletes to focus on their studies and athletic careers.
Another pro of paying college athletes is that it would help to level the playing field between athletes from different socio-economic backgrounds. Currently, many college athletes come from more privileged backgrounds and are able to afford the costs associated with their sport, such as travel expenses and equipment. However, athletes from lower-income families may not have the same financial resources, which can make it more difficult for them to participate in their sport at the same level as their wealthier counterparts. By providing a financial stipend to all college athletes, universities could help to create a more equitable environment for athletes of all backgrounds.
In addition to providing financial support, paying college athletes could also help to increase the overall quality of college sports. Currently, many college athletes are not able to focus on their sport full-time because they have to work part-time jobs to support themselves. This can lead to a lower level of skill and competitiveness, as athletes are not able to devote as much time to training and practice. By providing a financial stipend to college athletes, universities could allow them to focus on their sport full-time, which could lead to a higher level of skill and competitiveness.
Finally, paying college athletes could help to increase the overall popularity of college sports. Currently, college sports are not as popular as professional sports, in part because college athletes are not compensated for their efforts. By providing a financial stipend to college athletes, universities could help to increase the overall appeal of college sports and make them more attractive to both fans and sponsors.
In conclusion, there are several pros to paying college athletes, including providing financial support, leveling the playing field between athletes of different socio-economic backgrounds, increasing the overall quality of college sports, and increasing the overall popularity of college sports. While there are valid arguments on both sides of the debate, the pros of paying college athletes make it a compelling idea that is worth considering.
Should College Athletes Get Paid Pros and Cons List
Shawne Alston, et al. Brutlag Hosick, 2021 However, the policy in all three divisions maintains the commitment to avoid pay-for-play and improper inducements linked to attending a specific school. Depending on what programs were cut, it could even impact the safety of students over a long time period. If payment were allowable in the future without a cap, then there would be a bidding war among the top institutions for the best players coming out of high school each year. The NCAA has long prohibited athletes from accepting any outside money. This is due largely to the exposure and play time that they received in college.
They consider their sport as a job and think they deserve to be paid just like the coaches do. Many believe it is more righteous and deserving that the money from television networks running the college sport games should go back into the school as a whole and not to individual players. Fewer than 2 percent of NCAA student-athletes go on to be professional athletes. They carry what they learn about teamwork, individual responsibility, perseverance, and goal-oriented tasks with them as they grow into competent professionals. There's also the issue of unfair compensation among athletes. They deserve to see some of that profit, they are the reason that these school are making money, but they will never see any of College Athletes Deserve To Be Paid 1538 Words 7 Pages College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? The Pros and Cons
If he were to step onto the court again, then he would be placing his future at risk while the college and the apparel company sponsoring the program stood to bring in millions of dollars of profit because of the exposure. Do many NCAA student-athletes go on to play professionally? The ruling changed the broadcast regulations for college football. The Some athletes receive full tuition, scholarship coverage, and housing, which onlookers may interpret as payment for playing. Writing an Essay on This? It could prevent abuse. Thus, it can keep a student from transferring to another university.
Paying College Athlets: Pros and Cons: [Essay Example], 632 words GradesFixer
Scholarship grants can only attract so much. Schools with more resources and funding could potentially pay their athletes more, which could lead to a concentration of talent at certain programs. Paying college athletes has been a topic among students, parents and communities recently. How Did We Get Here? Unfair Pay If the players are paid based on the amount of revenue that they bring in, some players may not receive nearly as much compensation as others. Conservatives argue that college sports is not to provide profit to athletes, but to foster real sportsmanship between schools. Schools would also have to cut unprofitable sports including gymnastics, swimming and diving, tennis, track and field, volleyball, and wrestling.
The best athletes might be willing to play at their school longer. Universities who would be willing to pay their athletes would naturally attract more students with exceptional talents. This could be unfair to student players, especially those who might need more financial assistance. So, paying college athletes could eliminate widespread corruption by getting the money out in the open. Team sports have a significant positive impact on alumni ties, local and regional identities, recruitment and admissions, as well as fundraising. Because of the revenues their activities generate, the pros and cons of paying college athletes are closely scrutinized. The NCAA still does not allow colleges and universities to pay athletes like professional sports leagues pay their players—with salaries and benefits—but the new changes will allow college athletes to solicit endorsement deals, sell their own merchandise, and make money off of their social media accounts.
Likewise, academic eligibility clauses, such as grade requirements, may also be challenged. Thus, a move to pay them could be challenged in a court of law, which could lead to huge financial implications. It may also encourage college athletes to stay for education before going pro. List of the Advantages of Paying College Athletes 1. According to CNBC , 60% of NBA players go broke within five years of departing the league and 78% of former NFL players experience financial distress two years after retirement. It should be refined, not scrapped. Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid 537 Words 3 Pages Are they students or employees? Is it right to pay college athletes, if the public were to allow college athletes to be paid, then we could run into some problems.
So is it a good idea to pay college athletes or not? Some students in other programs would likely not earn the same amount as an athlete for their work-study program. Most people would agree that athletes should be compensated when profits are generated by their likeness and activities. Universities should not allow players to receive compensation for their performances. College athletes, no matter how good they are, are not allowed to be paid in any way. Should college athletes be paid? Attract more talent Why put your life on the line for something that pays nothing? It is not unusual for athletes to find a job outside of their sport and classroom schedule so that they have some spending money to use. On one hand, it could be argued that college athletes should be paid for their contributions to their respective sports programs and for the revenue that they generate for their universities and for the NCAA as a whole. Additionally, a lot of states permit athletes to work with agents and demand that schools be informed of any endorsement and advertising agreements.
It is notable that some team members engage in abuses, such as illegally taking cash from boosters. That creates a greater financial burden for everyone involved with the school. Athletic departments in the SEC are obviously going to have more money to spend than programs in the American Conference, so this would create a financial divide that could become unfair. Who is profiting from all the money being made from football, basketball, baseball, and many other sports teams at these colleges? Some states have cited the need to remain relevant for recruiting as a reason for the quick passage of their bills. Transferring schools without due permission from the original institution may result in lawsuits against the student for breach of contract.
Athletes with employment contracts must maintain athletic performance to earn their salary, and academic performance does not reflect their athletic achievement. Should College Athletes Get Paid Essay 2039 Words 9 Pages Also, what if an athlete gets hurt will the university still pay an injured athlete? Rather, they lose millions of dollars per year. He was guaranteed to be in the top thirty of the NFL draft pick in 2006. Pro 1 The NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly from the work and likenesses of college athletes. This issue would make it all but impossible to pay student-athletes in only the revenue sports since women make up about 15% of the student population in that category.