Difference between coercion and undue influence. Difference Between Coercion and Undue Influence 2022-10-17
Difference between coercion and undue influence
Rating:
6,2/10
1144
reviews
Coercion and undue influence are two forms of manipulative behavior that can be used to persuade or force someone to do something against their will. While both involve the use of pressure or manipulation to influence another person, there are some key differences between the two.
Coercion refers to the use of threats, intimidation, or physical force to make someone do something against their will. This can take many forms, such as threatening to harm someone if they do not comply with a request, using physical force to make someone do something, or using psychological manipulation to make someone feel threatened or intimidated. Coercion is often used as a means of control or domination, and is generally seen as unethical and potentially criminal behavior.
Undue influence, on the other hand, refers to the use of persuasion or manipulation to influence someone to do something against their own best interests. This can take many forms, such as using flattery or charm to manipulate someone into making a decision that is not in their own best interest, using emotional appeals to persuade someone to do something they may not want to do, or using a position of authority or trust to exert undue influence over someone. While undue influence is not necessarily criminal in nature, it can be unethical and can often lead to negative consequences for the person being influenced.
One key difference between coercion and undue influence is the level of force or intimidation involved. Coercion involves the use of threats or physical force to make someone do something, while undue influence relies on persuasion or manipulation rather than direct threats or force. Additionally, coercion is often seen as more harmful or damaging than undue influence, as it can involve physical violence or the threat of harm, while undue influence is more subtle and may not always be immediately recognized as manipulative behavior.
Another difference between coercion and undue influence is the level of harm or negative consequences that may result from the behavior. Coercion can often have more serious or long-lasting consequences, as it may involve physical harm or the threat of harm, while undue influence may be more subtle and may not always result in immediate or significant harm. However, both coercion and undue influence can lead to negative consequences for the person being influenced, and it is important to be aware of these forms of manipulation and to take steps to protect oneself from them.
In conclusion, coercion and undue influence are two forms of manipulative behavior that can be used to persuade or force someone to do something against their will. While both involve the use of pressure or manipulation to influence another person, there are some key differences between the two, including the level of force or intimidation involved and the potential for harm or negative consequences. It is important to be aware of these forms of manipulation and to take steps to protect oneself from them.
COERCION AND UNDUE INFLUENCE ⋆ LAWYERS GYAN
Umadutt Pande 1890 , a religious Guru B, whom A used to follow, took advantage of his trust and confidence and convinced him that according to the Bhagwad Gita, if you name all of your property after your Guru, you will get moksha. Coercion, as well as undue influence, is obstacles in obtaining free consent. Therefore, the contract can be cancelled at the party's request whose will is influenced by the other party. Coercion and Undue Influence are the terms related to the Contract between two or more persons. The Undue Influence can only be done if there exist a relationship between two parties. Presumptions of undue influence: Section 16 2 Now, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of the other when: 1. Coercion is criminal in nature.
Next
The Many Faces of “Coercion” and “Undue Influence”
Comparison Table Between Coercion vs Undue Influence Parameters of Comparison Coercion Undue Influence Definition Coercion refers to the act of compelling an individual or a party in an involuntary manner by employing threats such as force. Section 14 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that the consent is said to be free when it is not caused by Coercion, Undue Influence, Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mistake. One of the most important points here is that of consensus ad idem, which means that both the parties to the agreement must mean and agree to one and the same thing For example, A offers to sell his goods of a particular quality to B. There are two ways in which consent is obtained in such cases. Despite their differences, what is the common ground for coercion and undue influence? CONCLUSION The consent should be free from any coercion or undue influence so that contract could be enforceable by law. It is at the discretion of the Court to direct the aggrieved party to restore the benefit. Activities such as purchasing goods from a store, getting automobiles serviced, installing applications on our mobile phones, etc.
Next
Are coercion and undue influence the same? Explained by FAQ Blog
B agrees to sell after being threatened; this is coercion, and such consent is not free. Karippan 50 Mad 786: 1927 Mad 852: 103 IC 5 , an operator refused to hand over the charge of his main's book, records, and money until the last executed a deed of discharge in respect of the claim against him, and the Court ruled that the deed was coerced. Is undue influence coercion? That is why the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose will is influenced by the other party. The parties to contract are related to each other. Some people use different types of unfair practices to obtain the consent of another party. In Coercion, the consent is obtained by threat and the person is forced to give his consent while in Undue influence, the consent is obtained dominating the will of giver. This word claims importance in case of contract law, sexual harassment cases, and the corporate world because it can be used to sue or one can take decision when consent is given by the authority.
Next
Difference Between Coercion And Undue Influence
Whereas, such relation is not needed in coercion. Last Update: October 15, 2022 This is a question our experts keep getting from time to time. Under this threat, the wife and son executed the release deed. But when the contract is terminated on account of undue influence, it is at the discretion of the Court to direct the aggrieved party to restore the benefit. If consent to an agreement is caused by undue influence, the agreement becomes voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused. Third-party Coercion may move from even a third party; and also, the threat may be against the promisor himself or against a person in whose welfare the promisor is interested.
Next
Difference between Coercion and Undue Influence
Coercion includes blackmailing, threatening to kill or beat any person, torture, harming the family of a person, detaining property. Example: A threatens B to marry him, or else he will kill her whole family. In other words, the aggrieved party must show that his consent was not freely given. Hence, the nature of the offense is criminally liable. On the other hand, undue influence has been found out to be carried by the superior party to force the weaker party to agree to the contract. AGREEMENT If consent to an agreement is caused by coercion, the agreement becomes voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused. Coercion The term coercion has been explained under Coercion is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code,1860 or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatsoever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement.
Next
Difference Between Coercion and Undue Influence
X for 1 lakh. Faces of Coercion Historically, the main examples of coercion in research involve scandal and atrocities, such as individuals literally being forced to participate in research against their will, as occurred with experiments conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The parties to a contract may or may not be related to each other. In contrast, the individual who exercises undue influence is not punishable under IPC. In fact, we come across so many contracts without even realising that we are a party to one. Agreements which are domestic or social are not regarded as a valid contract as they lack the desire to form legal relations.
Next
COERCION VS UNDUE INFLUENCE
Undue influence results in a gain for the powerful party and loss for the weaker party. Coercion may involve the use of physical force or any kind of psychological harm to increase the credibility of the threat. It does not matter whether the Indian Penal Code was in force or not, where consent through coercion was obtained. What is the difference between duress and coercion? For example, if P unlawfully detains the daughter of Q, to coerce Q, so that Q enters into the agreement, such a case can be covered under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Besides, an older family member may use his seniority to obtain approval from junior family members.
Next
What is the difference between coercion and undue influence?
. Offer and acceptance can be regarded as the nascent stages of the formation of a contract. Example: A teacher forces his student to sell his brand new watch, in a very nominal price, to get good grades in the examination. Under this head several important topics fall like Coercion, Undue Influence, Fraud and Misrepresentation. SECTIONS It is governed by Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. When is a contract induced by undue influence? What does not amount to coercion? Undue influence is usually moral in nature, It uses mental pressure to gain the consent. A consent given in furtherance of any of the abovementioned factors is not free consent.
Next