Muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986. India Code: Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 2022-10-24

Muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986 Rating: 7,7/10 106 reviews

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 is a legislation enacted in India that aims to protect the rights of Muslim women in the event of divorce. The Act was a response to the practice of instant divorce, or triple talaq, which allowed Muslim men to divorce their wives instantly by simply uttering the word "talaq" (divorce) three times. This practice was widely criticized for being discriminatory towards women, as it gave men the power to unilaterally end a marriage without any regard for the welfare of their wives.

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 seeks to address this issue by providing a legal framework for the protection of the rights of Muslim women in the event of divorce. The Act makes it illegal for a Muslim man to divorce his wife by uttering the word "talaq" three times, and instead requires that any divorce must be conducted through a court of law. The Act also provides for the maintenance of Muslim women and their children in the event of divorce, ensuring that they are financially supported and not left destitute.

In addition to these provisions, the Act also grants Muslim women the right to seek maintenance during the period of iddat (a period of waiting after divorce or the death of a spouse). This is an important protection, as it ensures that Muslim women are able to support themselves and their children during this period of transition.

The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 has been widely hailed as a significant step forward in the protection of the rights of Muslim women in India. It has helped to reduce the prevalence of instant divorce and has ensured that Muslim women are able to seek legal recourse in the event of divorce.

However, it should be noted that the Act is not without its critics. Some have argued that it does not go far enough in protecting the rights of Muslim women, and that more needs to be done to address issues such as polygamy and child marriage. Others have argued that the Act is unnecessary and that it infringes upon the rights of Muslim men.

Despite these criticisms, it is clear that the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 represents a significant step forward in the protection of the rights of Muslim women in India. It has provided important legal protections for Muslim women in the event of divorce and has helped to ensure that they are not left destitute or vulnerable.

Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act, 1986 (updated)

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

Shah Bano Begum AIR 945, 1985 was a landmark case which led to enactment of the act in parliament of india. New Delhi: Left Word. Retrieved 1 May 2014. Cases of women getting lump sum payments for lifetime maintenance are becoming common. On violence: a reader.

Next

India Code: Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

This criticism has been accepted almost verbatim by the Supreme Court in Danial Latifi v Union of India. Retrieved 21 January 2020. India: University of Toronto Press. Shah Bano Begum A. Shah Bano Begum And Ors Decided 23April1985 1985-04-23 Citation s 1985 1 SCALE 767; 1985 3 SCR 844; 1985 2 SCC 556; AIR 1985 SC 945 Case history Prior action s Criminal Revision No. The main provisions of the act states that :- It is mandatory for the husband to provide maintenance to the wife after divorce till the iddat period ends. The Court, therefore, came to the conclusion that if the divorced wife is able to maintain herself, the husband's liability ceases with the expiration of the period of iddat but if she is unable to maintain herself after the period of iddat, she is entitled to have recourse to section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.


Next

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

The claims of culture equality and diversity in the global era. Order for payment of maintenance. Diluting the Supreme Court judgment, the act allowed maintenance to a divorced woman only during the period of The "Statement of Objects and Reasons" of the act stated that "the Shah Bano decision had led to some controversy as to the obligation of the Muslim husband to pay maintenance to the divorced wife and hence opportunity was therefore taken to specify the rights which a Muslim divorced woman is entitled to at the time of divorce and to protect her interests. Shahid Khan, the Supreme Court of India interpreted the act in a manner reassuring the validity of the case and consequently upheld the Shah Bano judgement, and The Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 was nullified. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.

Next

Muslim Women (Protection Of Rights On Divorce) Act, 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

University of California Press. The case became a milestone in Muslim women's fight for equal rights in matters of marriage and divorce in regular courts. The Shah Bano case which happened when the Congress party was in power, as one of the examples of the party's Critics of the Act point out that while divorce is within the purview of personal laws, maintenance is not, and thus it is discriminatory to exclude Muslim women from a civil law. Choudhury at ph no: 09650499965 Also check: For NRIs, marriage registration is compulsory. To put it in other words, whether deprivation of the Muslim divorced woman of her right to maintenance under the beneficial provisions of Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which are otherwise available to all other women in India, has been effected by a reasonable, right, just and a fair piece of law as enacted in the Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act of 1986? Indian controversies: Essays on religion in politics.

Next

Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

Third it found that the emphasis of s. Order for payment of maintenance. Before the enactment of this Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act, a Muslim woman, who was divorced by or from her husband, was granted a right to livelihood from her quondam husband in the shape of maintenance under the provisions of Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure until she remarried. Eastern Book Company: 1—10. Further the legislation so enacted must be in compliance with fundamental rights.

Next

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

A brief history of India. A brief history of India. Order for payment of maintenance 1 Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this Act or in any other law for the time being in force, where a Magistrate is satisfied that a divorced woman has not re-married and is not able to maintain herself after the iddat period, he may make an order directing such of her relatives as would be entitled to inherit her property on her death according to Muslim law to pay such reasonable and fair maintenance to her as he may determine fit and proper, having regard to the needs of the divorced woman, the standard of life enjoyed by her during her marriage and the means of such relatives and such maintenance shall be payable by such relatives in the proportions in which they would inherit her property and at such periods as he may specify in his order: Provided that where such divorced woman has children, the Magistrate shall order only such children to pay maintenance to her, and in the event of any such children being unable to pay such maintenance, the Magistrate shall order the parents of such divorced woman to pay maintenance to her: Provided further that if any of the parents is unable to pay his or her share of the maintenance ordered by the Magistrate on the ground of his or her not having the means to pay the same, the Magistrate may, on proof of such inability being furnished to him, order that the share of such relatives in the maintenance ordered by him be paid by such of the other relatives as may appear to the Magistrate to have the means of paying the same in such proportions as the Magistrate may think fit to order. Parliament, with its supposed omniscience in law, may, in its professed omnipotence enact legislations to undo and set at naught the effect of any judicial decision of the Supreme Court or any other Court, however good and conducive to the welfare of the people that decision may be. By this case judgement it provided a balance between both the act and the section provisions of maintenance. Power to make rules. The RSS and the BJP: a division of labour Repr.

Next

Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

University of California Press. Mahr or other properties of Muslim woman to be given to her at the time of divorce. Retrieved 3 May 2014. States and deals with Mahr or other properties of Muslim woman to be given to her at the time of divorce. Short title and extent. The Court held that it would be incorrect and unjust to extend the above principle of Muslim law to cases in which the divorced wife is unable to maintain herself. Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women Protection of Rights on Divorce Act 1986 were the principal sections, under attack before the court.

Next

Objective of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Divorce) Act, 1986

muslim women protection of rights on divorce act 1986

The person can visit the notary officer for getting its affidavit first, showing all authentic proves of birth, address and citizenship. Option to be governed by the provisions of sections 125 to 128 of Act 2 of 1974. It is the child who always suffer immeasurably and invaluably due to the ego clashes of the couple! Retrieved 21 January 2020. The Shah Bano case had once again spurred the debate on the Uniform Civil Code in India. However the Court held that if the Act accorded Muslim divorcees unequal rights to spousal support compared with the provisions of the secular law under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, then the law would in fact, be unconstitutional. Maintenance lawsuit in India Mohammed Ahmad Khan v. The decision although it reaffirmed Shah Bano, strangely did not cause any protest and is now the accepted as the authority for the proposition that that the powers and jurisdiction of a Magistrate under the 1986 Act are co-extensive with the those under s.

Next