Third party intervention in conflict resolution. PCR 771 THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION 2022-10-15
Third party intervention in conflict resolution Rating:
Third party intervention in conflict resolution refers to the involvement of a neutral entity in the resolution of a dispute between two or more parties. This can take many forms, including mediation, arbitration, and diplomacy, and can be an effective way to resolve conflicts that may not be able to be resolved through direct communication or negotiation between the parties involved.
One of the primary benefits of third party intervention is that it provides an unbiased and impartial perspective on the conflict. A neutral third party can help to identify the underlying issues and concerns of each party, and can facilitate the negotiation process by helping to identify common ground and potential solutions. This can be particularly useful in cases where the parties involved have become entrenched in their positions and are unable to see the other side's perspective.
Another advantage of third party intervention is that it can help to build trust and establish a sense of goodwill between the parties. By involving a neutral third party, the parties can feel more confident that their concerns and interests will be taken into account and that the resolution process will be fair. This can help to reduce tension and create a more positive atmosphere for resolution.
There are, however, some potential drawbacks to third party intervention in conflict resolution. One concern is that it may take longer to resolve the conflict, as the third party may need to spend time gathering information, conducting interviews, and facilitating negotiations. This can be frustrating for the parties involved, especially if they are eager to move on from the conflict.
Another potential issue is that the third party may not fully understand the context or dynamics of the conflict, which can limit their effectiveness in helping to resolve it. Additionally, there is always the possibility that the third party may not be able to facilitate a resolution, in which case the conflict may continue to escalate or may even become more intractable.
Overall, third party intervention can be a valuable tool in the resolution of conflicts, particularly when the parties involved are unable to resolve their differences on their own. It can provide an unbiased perspective, help to build trust and goodwill, and identify potential solutions that may not have been considered by the parties. However, it is important to carefully consider the potential drawbacks and limitations of third party intervention, and to carefully choose an appropriate third party to facilitate the resolution process.
The handbook of conflict resolution : theory and practice 2nd ed. An arbitrator is often an expert in the subject matter of the dispute, which can help to make the arbitrator's decision more fair and accurate. Game theoretic models in engineering decision making. The parties go to arbitration knowing they have to abide by the final decision, even if they disagree with it. The mediator does this by helping the parties to communicate more effectively, understand each other's positions, and find common ground. It is a mediator or someone who does not have the power or authority to coerce parties in conflict to accept his verdict.
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 39 1 , 96—108. I use the preceding time segment to limit the bidirectional influence of the antagonist behaviour on intervention behaviour, as detailed above. Since the ambition of the current article is to study the continuation of conflict, the analysis is only based on time segments directly preceded by conflict behaviour by the same antagonist. Like arbitration, litigation will resolve the dispute and there will generally be a winner and a loser. Interpersonal conflict 7th ed.
The camera operators were instructed to record the presence of any conflict irrespective of whether it escalated to physical violence or not. Violence is deliberately targeted at civilians, and at entire groups rather than individuals, and it presents a complete blurring of the lines between wars, organized crime and large scale human rights violations Kaldor 1999:2. Litigation Litigation is a process in which two parties in conflict take their dispute to court. This difference in the importance of impressions means that some third parties have more power to influence antagonists than others. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 4 , 760—770. This third party seeks to influence and help resolve the conflict. The business owner decides to file a lawsuit.
Close This captures the mutual agreements, ensuring that all parties are satisfied and that the resolution is acceptable, pragmatic and perceived as fair. It involves filing a lawsuit and having your dispute resolved either by a judge or a jury. Students who are interested in conflict resolution in general, or who want to learn a specific method of intervention, could benefit from the book. This means that the types of intervention included in the current analysis are limited to the visible behaviours of the third parties. The art and science of negotiation.
Third Party Conflict Resolution: Strategies & Explanation
Mediation and facilitation have traditionally been the most common forms of non- coercive third-party intervention in armed conflicts. Conflict resolution in water resources and environmental management p. Analyse the attributes of a third party intervenor. Decision support systems engineering. While each relationship thus remains the same, an antagonist can be the target of intervention by third parties from both their in- and out-group within the same situation. Furthermore, internal conflicts in Africa have led to various outcomes, for example some have resulted in total state collapse as in Somaliaor semi state collapse as in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and others have led to secession as in Eritrea. Funding The research was supported by a grant provided by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO Aspasia Grant Scheme: 015.
STATUS OF THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION
The intervention behaviours are coded with a time-stamp to know exactly when each intervention behaviour happens in the development of the conflict. Automatica, 23 1 , 41—55. You may have some extra protections in court because of certain rules of evidence and procedures to protect the rights of disputing parties. Work Cited Byrne, Sean. For each of the antagonists, I coded the conflict behaviours of this individual throughout the conflict situation. This is done by helping the parties to communicate more effectively, understand each other's positions, and find common ground.
(PDF) Conflict Resolution: An Introduction to Third Party Intervention. pdf
One of the characteristics of mediation is that the parties themselves reach the result of the process. This type of attitude continued up until modern times where domestic violence was untouched by law and viewed as private business due to the fact that it occurred in the confines of the home. This means that the analysis is limited to investigations of how the intervention shapes the immediate development of the antagonist behaviour. This means that while third parties are more likely to intervene when they know someone involved in a conflict et al. Arbitration Arbitration is a process where a neutral third party is brought in to arbitrate - or resolve - your dispute.
First, it aims to explore some of the key factors that play an influential role in the occurrence of third-party coordination. Conflict resolution in the twenty-first century: Principles, methods and approaches. Mediation Mediation is the use of a neutral third-party to help the disputing parties resolve the dispute on their own. This study extends this finding to the second-by-second development of conflicts. Another limitation of the current analysis is the lack of sound. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
Third Party Intervention in Conflict Resolution: Dispute Between Bangladesh and India over Control of the Ganges River
Overall, the model with the subtypes of intervention behaviour presented in section 2 of Robustness of findings A central decision of the analysis is the delimitation of the conflict into three-second time segments. Accordingly, comparing mediation with other forms of third-party interventions, it can be seen that the main difference can be seen that arbitration has win-lose solutions. A study on the roles of a third party in the Ganges River water conflict between Bangladesh and India in Japanese. Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution. And when parties in conflict commence communicating with each other, the bridge for settlement becomes shorter.