Animal testing is the use of animals in scientific and medical research to develop new products or to test the safety and effectiveness of existing ones. It is a controversial practice that has been the subject of much debate and controversy for many years. While proponents of animal testing argue that it is necessary for the advancement of medical science and the development of new treatments and therapies, opponents argue that it is unethical, unnecessary, and inhumane.
One of the main arguments against animal testing is that it is unethical. Many people believe that animals have the same rights as humans and that it is wrong to use them for experimentation. They argue that animals are sentient beings with the ability to feel pain and suffering, and that it is therefore wrong to subject them to procedures that may cause them harm.
Another argument against animal testing is that it is unnecessary. Many opponents of animal testing argue that there are alternative methods of testing that are just as effective and more humane. For example, researchers can use cell cultures, computer models, and human volunteers to test the safety and effectiveness of new products. These methods are not only more humane, but they also offer more accurate and reliable results, since they more closely mimic human biology and behavior.
Finally, opponents of animal testing argue that it is inhumane. Many animals used in research are subjected to harsh conditions, including confinement, deprivation, and physical and psychological stress. They may also be subjected to painful and invasive procedures, such as surgery and injection. These conditions can cause animals to suffer, and many people believe that it is wrong to subject animals to such treatment.
In conclusion, animal testing is wrong because it is unethical, unnecessary, and inhumane. While it may be tempting to use animals in scientific research to advance medical science and develop new treatments and therapies, there are more humane and effective alternatives available. We should strive to find ways to test new products and treatments that do not rely on animal suffering, and instead focus on methods that are more ethical, accurate, and reliable.
Paul Ralph Ehrlich (born March 29, 1932), American biology professor
I agree, human population is a big pile of steaming BS. But on average people create a little bit more than they use up in their lifetimes. And yet, stays skinny as a rail. Here is a top Dental Scientist, Dr. SOURCE: PRESENTER: Japan's leaders are working on a raft of new measures to encourage citizens to get married and have children in a bid to boost the country's flagging birth rate. He noted that, "Fifty-eight academies of science said that same thing in 1994, as did the world scientists' warning to humanity in the same year. SOURCE: Julian Simon, famed economist and author of The Ultimate Resource, had a remarkably similar background to Paul Ehrlich.
Paul R. Ehrlich
This book, organized and written by the authors of The Birder's Handbook, and enriched by 191 strikingly beautiful color paintings illustrating all of the birds treated, is the first concise, authoritative review of the status of the birds currently imperiled in the United States and Canada - those that are federally listed as Endangered or Threatened and those that are listed by the National Audubon Society as suffering local or regional or. United States prosperity relies on a stable population, and Mexico, with her burgeoning population, increasing poverty, and massive unemployment, is threatening the traditional U. Unfortunately for Ehrlich but not for the world , humanity learned a little about agriculture and other resources in the intervening 100 years. . One of his important collaborators there was Max Neisser.
Biography:Paul R. Ehrlich
Fay, Richard ffrench-Constant, Sherri Fownes, Lawrence E. Eco-Science: Population, Resources, and Environment. SOURCE: Renowned scientist Paul Ehrlich has been in the public spotlight for half a century now. Proof of it is all around us. It sold more than two million copies worldwide, was translated into numerous languages, shaped public discourse around the population issue for a generation, and catapulted Paul Ehrlich into the unlikely category of "superstar scientist.
Paul R. Ehrlich: Population Bomb Theory
Redding: Addison Wesley, 1992. Virtually all the minds in America have been turned to applesauce. In the US, not only sperm counts are low, but all the hormones like testosterone are out of whack. In a 2008 discussion hosted by the website In 2011, as the world's population passed the seven billion mark Ehrlich has argued that the next two billion people on Earth would cause more damage than the previous two billion because we are now increasingly having to resort to using more marginal and environmentally damaging resources. Proceedings of the Royal Society. The twenty-six chapters are organized into broad functional areas, covering the uses of butterflies in the study of behavior, ecology, genetics and evolution, systematics, and conservation biology.
