Lenin compared to stalin. Differences between Marxism, Leninism, Trotskyism, Stalinism, and Maoism 2022-10-04
Lenin compared to stalin Rating:
8,6/10
840
reviews
Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were both influential figures in the history of the Soviet Union, but they had very different ideologies and approaches to governance.
Lenin, who was the leader of the Bolshevik Party and the first head of government in the Soviet Union, was a Marxist revolutionary who believed in the ideals of socialism and the overthrow of capitalism. He was a strong advocate for the working class and believed in the concept of "democratic centralism," in which decisions were made democratically within the party and then implemented centrally.
Stalin, on the other hand, was a more authoritarian leader who came to power after Lenin's death in 1924. He was more concerned with consolidating his own power and building the Soviet Union into a major global superpower. Stalin implemented a series of economic policies known as "socialism in one country," which focused on rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture. He also implemented a brutal regime of repression, in which he suppressed any opposition to his rule and orchestrated the deaths of millions of people through forced labor camps and purges.
Despite their different ideologies and approaches to governance, both Lenin and Stalin were instrumental in shaping the course of the Soviet Union. Lenin played a key role in the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the establishment of the Soviet Union, while Stalin's policies of industrialization and collectivization helped to transform the Soviet Union into a major world power.
However, the legacies of Lenin and Stalin are also very different. Lenin is often remembered as a visionary leader who fought for the rights of the working class, while Stalin is remembered as a ruthless dictator who oversaw widespread repression and human rights abuses. In the end, it is up to history to decide how these two leaders will be remembered, but it is clear that they both played a significant role in shaping the course of the Soviet Union and its place in the world.
Lenin vs Stalin: Their Showdown Over the Birth of the USSR
The outcome is the familiar exploitation of the third world by the first world states. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union became one of the most powerful nations in the world, and his policies led to a period of great economic prosperity. Stalin was a despotic ruler who more than any other individual molded the features that characterized the Soviet regime and shaped the direction of Europe after World War II ended in 1945. Leninism What is Leninism? The strength of this deviation really depends on the reader. They were just a necessary ingredient within a complex dialectical interplay at a given point in time. In the period between the two revolutions of 1917, Stalin again proved useful, he arranged for Lenin to be smuggled out of the country after the failed Bolshevik coup known as the July Days.
Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Life in the Soviet Union Under Lenin and Stalin, life in the Soviet Union was decidedly different. However, he leaned away from the economic policy of Lenin and applied his own New Economic Policies. The insurrection of five kulak districts should be pitilessly suppressed. The conclusion is quite simple: the investors will take the profits, naturally; but they will also maintain a system of dependency upon their capital with the industry oil, metallurgy and cement industry. In reality they didn't agree to the Bolshevik price fixing scheme, Lenin and Stalin reacted like totalitarian communists do: killing and imprisoning them and taking their produce. On a more serious note, you have to judge these people within the context they lived and ruled.
Lenin Vs Stalin: What's The Difference? » Differencess
Lenin was a political theorist and leader who helped to establish communism in Russia after the Russian Revolution of 1917. Really, it wasn't until late 1922 that Reds win the Civil war, and Lenin dies in January 1924, so he is only in complete control of Russia for a little over a year. His work changes towards a more accepted view prior to the revolution as if to gain popularity and returns back to his previous views after. At that point, it does not matter whether he is good or bad. Conclusion Lateness or absences were punished by sacking, and this could often lead to the person losing their own home as well, this would affect the people because with no income, how would they afford to live? While Marx did not articulate much on the political workings of the revolution and was mainly concerned with the flaws in the economy, Lenin thought to articulate how the revolution should proceed in political terms and so did almost everyone else after Marx. At the conference Lenin liked the young firebrand, who, discreetly, offered to keep on robbing banks to fund Lenin's faction of the party the Bolsheviks. What were the contradictions? Final Conclusion to answer the question: How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union? Italy and Germany are suffering from spreading revolutionary ideas.
Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Stalin and Lenin were similar to an extent in their character but had many contrasting qualities. Capitalism functions in cycles of booms and recessions, it needs unemployment, it needs wage labour, etc. Lenin was responsible for creating the Soviet Union and remained its leader until his death in 1924. I think one major difference is that Lenin probably would have taken a much harder line with religions than Stalin. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The main difference between Lenin and Stalin is that Lenin allowed some private business while Stalin created a command economy. He argued that the USSR must always come first in the government's plans.
How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?
However they differed on the way this new Russia should be run. Like me, he sees everything from a relative historical perspective. Lenin was born in Simbirsk in middle class family his father was a successful local government official but Stalin was born in a lower class family his parents were poor peasants in Georgia. This conflicted with general strategy set by Lenin and Trotsky, which focused upon the capture of Warsaw further north. New York: Random House, c1993, p. It warned of dangers that he anticipated and made suggestions for the future. Thus, with Stalin's death there ultimately occurred a denouncing of Stalinism and personality cults.
Stalin first met Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik faction of the Social Democratic Party, when he returned to Georgia. Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. He was the first to adopt the ideals of Karl Marx, and combined them with his own to form what is known as Marxism-Leninism. After waiting for decades, I dont think Lenin would have a skeptical approach to rule-power of landlords who have made the people suffer for so long, kept them backwards and lived on other's work without any contribution, just because they are born that way. Along with Marxism and his policies, he founded a new political theory Leninism.
Some of those suggestions included increasing the size of the Stalin and Trotsky were criticised: Comrade Stalin, having become Secretary-General, has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution. Trotsky believed in Russia's trying to spread communism all over the world as Snowball's purpose with animalism and Stalin was more focused on the prosperity of Russia, as was Napoleon about the wellness of the farm. In May 1918, Lenin dispatched Stalin to the city of Tsaritsyn. Lenin is a quintessential example of the 20th century totalitarian ruler: he had a cult of personality, he ran a huge bureaucracy dedicated to controlling every aspect of society and daily life, and he brutally repressed any signs of dissent with a secret police force and standing army. As for Molotov, it would be more reasonable to presume that, as a former high-level functionary of the Stalinist era, Molotov was speaking as a self-interested apologist for Stalin or at least Stalin's track record in opposition to Khrushchev's de-Stalinization policies. You fail to address my other points, so I'll repeat them. While I believe and I feel most people do that Lenin wasn't a horrid dictator like Stalin was, personally I still typify Lenin as a good guy I suppose.
Why did Molotov say, "Compared to Lenin, Stalin was a mere lamb", especially in light of the Purges, Holodomor and so on? Was there a genuine reason or was Molotov just being a sycophant? : AskHistorians
His chief goals were to overthrow the provisional government. It was expanded upon after his death. And I certainly wouldn't say that Stalin was "a mere lamb" compared to him. Retrieved July 22, 2022. Lenin only ruled for five years. Additionally, for Marx the revolt must be a global revolt — the interest of the proletariat is a global interest and the possibility of the classless society is only feasible if the movement is a global movement. The Mensheviks thought that the get revolution the best thing to do was to wait for the bourgeois stage had to happen first.
Stalin was more political while Lenin was more of a revolutionary and father figure for modern The Similarities Between Lenin And Stalin's Policies During the turbulent years in which Lenin had passed, his significance still continued to dominate Russian politics. His contribution to political science, Leninism, was developed from his interpretations on the Marxist theory. I assume he and the other leaders had to take measures. Retrieved January 29, 2021. . Personally, these two things, plus the fact that Stalin is a big boy and can make his own decisions lead me to conclude that Stalin's brutality wasn't all Lenin's fault, but it could be argued.
Lenin created the Revolution and Communist Russia 1917-1923. And because of him Social Democrats split in to Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. I din't think there was any cult of personality when Lenin was around and active. . After the October Revolution, Stalin was still useful to Lenin: Lenin knew that his brutal side would be useful during the civil war that erupted. We both know that this thread cannot accommodate such a profound philosophical discussion.
