The Lottery, a short story written by Shirley Jackson, has been the subject of much criticism since its publication in 1948. One of the most common criticisms of the story is that it is overly violent and disturbing. The plot of the story revolves around an annual tradition in a small town, in which a member of the community is chosen by lottery and stoned to death by their neighbors. This barbaric act is described in graphic detail, and many readers have found the violence and brutality depicted in the story to be disturbing and disturbing.
Another criticism of The Lottery is that it is too vague and ambiguous. The story provides very little context or explanation for the annual tradition of the lottery, leaving readers to fill in the gaps and interpret the story for themselves. This lack of context has led to a variety of interpretations of the story, with some readers seeing it as a commentary on the dangers of blindly following tradition, while others see it as a critique of mob mentality and the dangers of groupthink.
A third criticism of The Lottery is that it is overly simplistic and lacks depth. Many readers have argued that the story is too straightforward and lacks the complexity and nuance of other works of literature. The characters in the story are one-dimensional and flat, and the plot is predictable and lacks surprise or twist.
Despite these criticisms, however, The Lottery has remained a popular and widely-read short story. Its enduring popularity may be due to its ability to generate discussion and debate, as well as its powerful and thought-provoking themes. Ultimately, the criticism of The Lottery serves to highlight the diversity of opinions and interpretations that can arise from a single work of literature, and serves as a testament to the enduring power of literature to provoke and challenge our beliefs and assumptions.
Why the Articles of Confederation Failed
People were Advantages Of The Articles Of Confederation 85 Words 1 Pages The Articles of Confederation was the original constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781, and replaced by the US Constitution in 1789. What are the Articles of Confederation strengths and weaknesses? Even with a strong state government, when faced with foreign and issues on a national level, the Articles lacked a strong central government. Having a minority exert its will over the majority was inimical to the republican values for which the Revolution had been waged. This left the government unable to meet basic fiscal obligations and led to rising costs in the financing of the national debt and a collapse in public confidence. What are the flaws in the Articles of Confederation? The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.
What Was the Biggest Flaw in the Articles of Confederation?
Congress had done things that benefited the United States while the second continental congress created a government that lacked power which cause problems. From the beginning of the American Revolution, congress felt the need to have a stronger union and a government which would be powerful enough to defeat Great Britain. Why was Articles of Confederation bad? What was the main weakness of the Articles of Confederation Why? The vestment clause, dedicated all executive powers to the President, granting him unilateral Did The Constitution Create A More Perfect Union Essay 560 Words 3 Pages The U. Some critics of the Constitution alleged that this language gave Congress a blank check to pass any laws it wished. Now Americans that had their freedom, they worried about how they would maintain order among themselves.
Confederation Flaws
The legislative branch and executive branch did this task. The purpose of the document was to create a confederation of where each state kept its own sovereignty. In conclusion, the Articles of Confederation greatly impacted Articles of Confederation and Articles of Constitution After the Declaration of Independence, there was a sense among Congressman that they wanted a written document creating a government justifying the existence of the United States. Overview of the Problems With the Articles of Confederation The preservation of the Union was crucial for the security, liberty, and prosperity of the American people. However, the central government lacked the ability to ivey taxes and regulate commerce issues. A national government that was unable to exercise supremacy over its constituent members was not a national government at all; it was merely a voluntary treaty or association, vulnerable to dissolution by any of the parties to it.
