Cons of civil disobedience. Civil Disobedience in Democracies: Why Citizens May Break the Law › United Academics Magazine 2022-10-30
Cons of civil disobedience Rating:
7,8/10
150
reviews
Civil disobedience is the act of intentionally and publicly disobeying laws, usually as a form of protest or to bring attention to a perceived injustice. While it can be a powerful tool for bringing about social change, it also has a number of potential drawbacks and consequences that must be considered.
One of the primary cons of civil disobedience is that it can lead to conflict and violence. When people openly defy laws and authority, it can create tension and trigger a response from those in power. This can lead to clashes between protesters and law enforcement, which can result in physical injuries and property damage. Civil disobedience can also potentially incite violence from other groups or individuals who disagree with the cause being protested.
Another con of civil disobedience is that it can create legal problems for those who participate. Disobeying laws, even for a just cause, can result in arrest, fines, and criminal charges. This can lead to negative consequences for individuals, including a criminal record, which can impact their ability to find employment or housing in the future.
Civil disobedience can also have negative impacts on the cause being protested. If the protests turn violent or disruptive, it can turn public opinion against the cause and make it harder to garner support. This is especially true if the media portrays the protesters as being unreasonable or out of control.
Additionally, civil disobedience can lead to a breakdown of the rule of law. While it is important to hold governments accountable and to protest injustices, it is also important to respect the legal system and the processes in place for bringing about change. When people openly defy laws and authority, it can erode trust in the legal system and create a sense of chaos and anarchy.
In conclusion, while civil disobedience can be a powerful tool for bringing about social change, it also has a number of potential cons and consequences that must be carefully considered. It can lead to conflict and violence, create legal problems for those who participate, negatively impact the cause being protested, and undermine the rule of law.
5 Pros and Cons of Civil Disobedience
Was Martin Luther King Justified In Civil Disobedience 785 Words 4 Pages Civil disobedience makes a statement. Anthony, Martin Luther King Jr. So how, then, did Thoreau manage to influence such political giants? Violence broke out between members of the Ku Klux Klan and the Black Lives Matter movement as "shouts of 'racists go home ' clashed with chants of 'white power '" CNN. Mahatma Gandhi strived for better lives for the people of India by using different methods of non-violent protest and boycotts. One can be disobedient by refusing to obey or follow specific expectations on their own. The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, VA include groups associated with neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the hard elements of the alt-right. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes Gopnik 2012.
When these acts are done in ways that limit harm and promote a moral outcome most can agree upon such as the abolition of slavery in all forms , then the results are often positive. The people who believe they need a government are willing to accept an imperfect one. Hrabowski was arrested during the march, and images of dogs and police officers attacking the children drew global scorn. His efforts caused India to gain its independence in 1947. People from the majority can use this tool to promote awareness of critical issues facing these groups too. In each instance, people stood up for what they thought was just and right. This article, which originally appeared in The Freeman in December 1964, is an adaptation of Mr.
Since the 1980s, organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU are viewed as being overly supportive of criminals and activists instead of the majority in society. I agree with this to an extent. In exchange for defense, social needs, or other benefits provided to all, they are allowed to govern through consent. On the other hand, it is part of the democratic ideal that we ought to respect the outcome of democratic decision-making procedures as legally binding, even when we disagree with that outcome and think it is unjust see for example With civil disobedience, an interesting philosophical question arises: how are we to reconcile the idea that civil disobedience is sometimes morally justified with the idea that citizens of liberal democracies ought to respect the opinion of their fellow citizens and follow democratically enacted laws, even when these laws are unjust or wrong? It provides another check and balance in the framework of society. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. First and foremost, civil disobedience is Civil Disobedience By Martin Luther King Jr.
Mohandas Gandhi was an Indian man who spent his life protesting the unjust anti-Indian law in Britan using, you guessed it, civil disobedience. Here are some of the other key points to consider in the pros and cons of civil disobedience. Under certain conditions, the resulting silences can then be filled in antagonistic yet lawful ways…. Violent protesting demonstrates the implementation of a short-term strategy to show the accumulation of anger and frustration among communities. It must be nurtured anew by each generation of responsible citizenry.
If you think that a law has been passed that is not in the best interest of the people, if the government is doing something wrong, if you want the government to do something or if you simply wish to stand up for a cause and let the people in power hear you then civil disobedience allows you to express yourself without breaking the law. Martin Luther King Jr. John Locke, an enlightenment thinker who our founding fathers took ideas from, came up with the idea of the social contract. Although there is always a physical risk involved with civil disobedience, anyone at any age can create the change they wish to see in the world. The second concept beneath the harm principle is that this principle is imposed to prevent someone from trying to cause harm in a certain way. Civil Disobedience: Loving V.
In this essay I will be comparing the Ohio poor People's Campaign to the instances in SELMA. The concept of righteous civil disobedience, I think, is incompatible with the concept of the American legal system. His actions inspired Mahatma Gandhi to take civil action against Britain how was ruling over them at the time, leading to their independence. Canvassing other areas of law, we find many more examples of actors engaging in a practice that seems to be a looking-glass version of civil disobedience: challenging a legal or policy scheme by adhering, in methodical yet unexpected ways, to its formal provisions. The riots in Baltimore over the death of Freddie Gray are an excellent example of this disadvantage.
Civil Disobedience: A Threat to Our Society Under Law
The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s saw young adults, teens, and even children to the marches that were held. For example, if a group of people refuses to pay taxes as a peaceful way to express disapproval of those laws they disagree with or taxes. The fact that particular reforms have not been completely achieved does not justify rejecting legal means—the only hope for lasting achievement. The Civil Rights movement was split by two factions: one was a violent resistance named The Black Panthers and the other was a nonviolent protest led by Martin Luther King Jr. Individuals become radicalized when they begin to adopt increasingly extreme ideologies from social, political, or religious viewpoints. Stated in the article ¨Fifty years ago , Martin Luther King Jr.
Now as far as the impact that civil disobedience has on a free society, I believe that it is a positive one. These civil rights activists were not only protesting against the procedure that led to the decision, they were also protesting the outcome of the procedure. Malaysia has long been apprehended of as located somewhere between the grey zone of democracy and authoritarianism. The law is unconstitutional if made viewpoint discrimination. The United States prevents government control through the use of checks and balances through the three branches of government. Such people, Thoreau argued, accept government as a "necessary evil.
The purpose is to force concessions from the government or occupying power. Citizens disobey the rules. Violent acts of civil disobedience can physically harm others. Civil disobedience has it's roots away back in Greece. Theme Of Civil Disobedience In Antigone 1786 Words 8 Pages For negotiation, king and his followers tried to talk to the city authorities of Birmingham about the law and they were refused. On most accounts, civil disobedience consists of an open violation of law and a willingness to submit to punishment.
