Jim and the indians. Jim and the Indians childhealthpolicy.vumc.org 2022-10-18
Jim and the indians Rating:
Drugs are chemical substances that can alter the way the body functions. They can be found in many forms, including prescription medications, over-the-counter remedies, and illegal substances. While some drugs are used for medicinal purposes, others are used recreationally and can lead to harmful consequences.
The use of drugs has been present throughout human history, dating back to ancient civilizations. In more recent times, the use and abuse of drugs has become a major issue, with the potential to cause serious health problems and social issues.
One of the main reasons for the use of drugs is for their psychoactive effects, which alter a person's consciousness and can produce feelings of pleasure, relaxation, or altered perception. This is especially true for illegal drugs like marijuana, cocaine, and heroin, which are often used for recreational purposes.
However, the use of drugs can also have negative consequences. Many drugs are highly addictive, and people who use them regularly may develop a physical dependence on them. This can lead to a range of health problems, including organ damage, mental health issues, and even death.
Additionally, the illegal drug trade has contributed to crime and violence in many communities. The production, distribution, and sale of illegal drugs often involve organized crime groups and can lead to corruption and other criminal activity.
There are also societal impacts of drug use. Substance abuse can lead to problems in personal relationships, employment, and education. It can also have negative economic consequences, as the cost of treating drug addiction and the consequences of drug-related crime can be significant.
Despite the potential risks, drugs continue to be a part of society. It is important for individuals to be aware of the potential consequences of drug use and to make informed decisions about whether or not to use drugs. Education and prevention programs can help to reduce the negative impacts of drugs on individuals and communities.
Jim & The Indians. : askphilosophy
. His work has made our society aware of the discrimination the Native American culture has endured. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. The three answers simply being that either: 1: It is simply correct at all times to do what gets to the best consequences, even if a seemingly bad thing is done on the way. . I feel that most people would not condemn me whatever my choice - they would appreciate the dilemma and be grateful that it was not them who faced the choice.
Next, the authror digs deep into the history of the Indian economy. We can assume that killing the Indians is morally wrong. . . . However, even among the consequential community there is a heavy disagreement about just what and what not a consequentialist is to base judgments from, excluding the obvious that is it should be action-based.
Gandhi bases his arguments on several themes; he argues that it is not favorable for the Englishmen to leave India, only for the indians to adopt their British culture, arguing that, Indians would prefer an English rule in the absence of Englishmen. I argue 1 that our perfect Kantian duty of self-preservation can require our lying to save our own lives when threatened with unjust aggression, and 2 that Kant's understanding of moral duty was that duties are symmetrical, such that if one has a duty to perform a given action on one's own behalf or to protect one's own rational nature, then one also has a duty to perform similar acts on other's behalf or to protect their rational nature. The author outlines the long-term and short-term marketing plans that could be used by the company in India. But at the same time, the visitor behaves morally by accepting his responsibility as an agent capable of influencing the outcome. . Jim cannot be held responsible for the morally reprehensible actions of Pedro and the Captain, were they to kill one or all of the Indians. .
. The next statement or action by the visitor will potentially be remembered by the soldiers and villagers for the rest of their lives. For me, there's an interesting extension of this question: what if, somehow someway, Jim would be legally responsible if he didn't shoot the Indian and either a hanged, b sentenced to prison for life without parole, or c sentenced for five years in prison his safety assured - to what extent would these scenarios change the moral dimension of the situation? What do we consider to be human aspirations? Jim Elliot: Missionary Martyr. The goal of West with this portrait was not to offend the colonists but rather to give his appreciation to the American indians, who have taught him their way of life. . India and China are the largest nations in the world at present in terms of population size.
Why is this option not considered by others? He also argues that a self-reliance is a vital tool, which can be utilized by the indians, in that, the British must adhere to the indians demands if they desire any kind of deal. Because in real life we can never know that when another agent is involved. Williams may have been talking about the importance of personal intergrity and identity, but I haven't. Williams took this for granted. .
. Is the Captain looking for the headline "Distinguished visitor participates in fight against insurgency, shooting rebel"? What should he do? The history of the Indian people in the United States portrays the arrival of white colonizers who took everything indians owned- their land, lives, and to a great degree for many Indian tribes, their language and their culture. For Jim to kill an Indian is morally unjustifiable. . I am not the sort of person who will kill innocent people, even in desperate circumstances. This could be viewed as bringing a greater amount of happiness to a greater amount of people over a longer period, rather than bringing unhappiness to a small minority over a shorter period. I'm not saying that Jim has no responsiblity whatsoever for what happens if he refuses to do what he is asked to do.
. If this type of thought experiment is meant to approximate to real-life as much as possible, I can imagine a public statement to the village and soldiers: "I xyz, on behalf of my people and government, want to tell you that this act is wrong. Retrieved 21 February 2010. McCully married later that summer, forcing Elliot to look elsewhere for an unmarried man with whom he could begin working in Ecuador. . . Shadow of the Almighty.
The paper asserts that the answer is that the colonizers took away their lands, which is why the indians are now homeless. . . Hence, it needs one to be selfless in behavior as people's opinions matter more than that of an individual. . I have read the argument about agency carefully. .