Appeal against acquittal. Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Cases Can Be Filed Only Before High Court U/s.378(4) CrPC: Madras HC 2022-10-20
Appeal against acquittal Rating:
6,2/10
1688
reviews
An appeal against acquittal is a legal procedure that allows a party to challenge a decision made by a court to acquit a defendant in a criminal case. This means that the party, typically the prosecution, is asking the court to reconsider its decision and find the defendant guilty of the crime.
There are several reasons why a party might choose to appeal an acquittal. One reason could be that the party believes that the court made a mistake in its decision and that the defendant is actually guilty of the crime. Another reason could be that the party believes that the court applied the wrong legal principles or that there was some other error in the proceedings.
Appeals against acquittal are generally limited to cases where there is a question of law involved, rather than a question of fact. This means that the appeal will not be based on a reexamination of the evidence presented at trial, but rather on the legal principles that were applied by the court.
The process for an appeal against acquittal varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, the appeal may be heard by the same court that made the original decision, while in other cases it may be heard by a higher court.
If the appeal is successful, the defendant will be found guilty and may face additional penalties, including imprisonment or fines. If the appeal is unsuccessful, the original acquittal will stand and the defendant will be considered legally innocent of the crime.
It is important to note that appeals against acquittal are not common and are only granted in limited circumstances. The burden of proof is on the party bringing the appeal to show that the original decision was incorrect and that the defendant should be found guilty.
In summary, an appeal against acquittal is a legal procedure that allows a party to challenge a decision made by a court to acquit a defendant in a criminal case. It is a complex and often difficult process, and the burden of proof is on the party bringing the appeal to show that the original decision was incorrect.
Can prosecution appeal an acquittal?
Upholding the contention, this Court said : "We think this criticism is well-founded. United States, 355 U. In Ramanand Yadav v. Wilson, See Sanabria v. The golden thread which runs through the web of administration of justice in criminal case is that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other to his innocence, the view which is favourable to the accused should be adopted. Part 2 compares international criminal law and practice with these established standards and posits that international criminal law has stretched the limits of when a retrial is permissible far beyond the confines of the concept under international human rights law or the criminal law in any domestic jurisdiction, and moreover, has allowed the scope of a retrial to reach the standard of trial de novo, in clear breach of the double jeopardy rule. It held that no condition was imposed on the High Court in such appeal.
In other words, to find a defendant not guilty is to acquit. Ganapathi case is Per incuriam. In that case, the accused was acquitted by the trial Court. He, therefore, prays for quashing of the impugned order and seeks condonation of delay. How long does an appeal take UK? Besides the present chapter there are other provisions of the code which also gives Right to Appeal such as Sec 86, 250, 351,449,454,458 2. While doing so, the Petitioner shall have to file an application for seeking leave of this Court to entertain the appeal and file another application for seeking condonation of delay.
Law Web: Whether complainant can file appeal against acquittal before High court?
The Criminal Procedure Code makes distinction between the case filed by the complainant and the case filed on the police report. While protecting the generality of defendants in the criminal process, we show that under certain reasonable assumptions, these procedural mechanisms hurt innocent defendants by inducing prosecutors to adjust their behavior and thus triggering adverse practices. What does it mean if an appeal is allowed? Commissioner of Sales Tax; Thompson v. It was also commented that the High Court committed an error of law in observing that "when a strong 'prima facie' case is made out against an accused person it is his duty to explain the circumstances appearing in evidence against him and he cannot take shelter behind the presumption of innocence and cannot state that the law entitles him to keep his lips sealed. In an appeal against an order of acquittal by the State, the High Court reversed the order of the trial court. United States, 420 U.
United States, Finch v. State of Rajasthan, this Court has consistently recognised the right of the Appellate Court to review the entire evidence and to come to its own conclusion, bearing in mind the considerations mentioned by the Privy Council in Sheo Swarup's case. Previously, under the Due Process Clause, there was no barrier to state provision for prosecutorial appeals from acquittals. An acquittal is a finding by a judge or jury that a defendant is not guilty of the crime charged. Emperor, AIR 1945 PC 151.
Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Cases Can Be Filed Only Before High Court U/s.378(4) CrPC: Madras HC
Unless such direction is issued, the Petitioner claiming to be the victim, cannot prefer an appeal. Upholding the decision of the High Court and following the proposition of law in Sheo Swarup, a six Judge Bench speaking through pc 227 2 Fazl Ali, J. Cri 2312, it was held that provisoto Section 372 of the Cr. Therefore, the test suggested by the expression 'substantial and compelling reasons' should not be construed as a formula which has to be rigidly applied in every case. The very Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal of Criminal nature filed before the Court of Sessions will be considered as the memorandum of grounds of appeal in the renumbered Criminal Appeal. Section 378 confers power on the State to present an appeal to the High Court from an order of acquittal.
If the only thing that had to be done was to enter a judgment on a guilty verdict after reversal, appeal was constitutional and permitted under the statute; Footnote United States v. Which amendment protects a citizen from unlawful searches and seizures? Can a suspect be tried again after acquittal if new evidence is discovered? The said section is material and may be quoted in extenso; 378. So far as this Court is concerned, probably the first decision on the point was Prandas v. Martin Linen Supply Co. Firstly, the presumption of innocence available to him under the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence that every person shall be presumed to be innocent unless he is proved guilty by a competent court of law. Notice was issued by the Court on August 07, 2006 on appeal as also on application for bail.
Appeal Against Acquittal: Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
The procedure established by law has been creatively interpreted by the Supreme Court to include within its scope the implicit guarantee of a fair, just and reasonable procedure. Complainantas contemplated under Section 138 of the NIA cannot be treated as a victimunder provisoto Section 372 of the Cr. The Committee considered the scheme and interpreting Section 417 of the. There is no statutory, case law or generally accepted definition of the not proven verdict, nor of the difference between the not proven and not guilty verdicts. The State of Maharashtra and others, 2013 ALL MR Cri 1153.
In simple term an appeal is a case that has been filed to the superior court to make correction in the decision of the inferior court. It is, however, submitted that Article 114 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be read into the proviso to Section 372. Massey, 8 The Criminal Appeals Act of 1907, United States v. Thus, the complainant as contemplated under Section 138 of the Act of 1881, cannot be treated as a victim under proviso to Section 372 of the Code. The proviso is aimed at either clarifying the position in law in consonance with the specific section or would in itself be a substantive provision without running counter to the meaning flowing from the section.
The referrals of the Supreme Court judgments by the bench were Damodar S. Now, under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 there is a distinction made between right to appeal against acquittal and that of conviction; the latter being more wide, and less restricted. Pattabiraman, 1985 1 SCC 591, has elaborately examined the scope of proviso to the substantive provision of the Section and rules of its interpretation. Similarly in Ajmer Singh v. However, a proviso is added by the Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 2008 to the effect that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing inadequate compensation and such appeal shall lie to the court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such court. The said proviso confers a statutory right upon the victim, as defined under Section 2 wa of Cr. Such appeals, that is appeals against orders of acquittal passed by a Magistrate in respect of a cognizable and nonbailable offence can only be filed in the Sessions Court at the instance of the Public Prosecutor as directed by the District Magistrate.
)
