Anwr drilling pros and cons. Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: How Drilling for Oil Could Impact Wildlife 2022-10-05
Anwr drilling pros and cons Rating:
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is a vast expanse of land in northeastern Alaska that is home to a wide variety of wildlife, including caribou, polar bears, and migratory birds. It is also believed to contain significant reserves of oil and natural gas, which has led to a long-standing debate about whether or not to allow drilling in the area. Here are some of the pros and cons of ANWR drilling:
Economic benefits: Drilling in ANWR has the potential to provide a significant boost to the economy. It could create jobs, generate revenue for the state of Alaska and the federal government, and reduce our reliance on foreign oil.
Energy independence: The United States is the world's largest consumer of oil, and we currently import a significant portion of our oil from other countries. Drilling in ANWR could help reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy, making us more energy independent.
Improved technology: As with any new project, drilling in ANWR would require the use of new technologies and techniques, which could lead to improvements in the industry as a whole.
Environmental impacts: The ANWR is home to a wide variety of wildlife and ecosystems, and drilling could have negative impacts on these species and their habitats. There are concerns about the effects of noise, air and water pollution, and habitat destruction on the wildlife in the area.
Climate change: Extracting and burning fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas releases carbon dioxide, which is a major contributor to climate change. Drilling in ANWR would increase our reliance on these fossil fuels and contribute to the problem of global warming.
Limited benefits: While drilling in ANWR could provide some economic benefits, it is unlikely to solve our long-term energy needs. The United States consumes a large amount of oil, and the reserves in ANWR are relatively small in comparison.
In conclusion, the decision to allow drilling in ANWR is a complex one that involves weighing the potential economic benefits against the potential environmental and climate impacts. It is important to carefully consider all of the pros and cons before making a decision that could have long-lasting consequences.
Pros and Cons of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling
This would be a major boost to the economy, particularly in rural areas where jobs are often scarce. ANWR is an area of land in northeast Alaska that consists of 19 million acres of land that is administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service FWS and is viewed as one of the most promising United States onshore gas and oil prospects Corn, Gelb, and Baldwin 4. List of Pros of Drilling in ANWR 1. Drilling will also increase oil revenues for the state of Alaska , which is a huge benefit. As countless organizations, non-profits, researchers, governments, and concerned citizens continue to pour more and more time and money into the conservation of this flagship species, permitting drilling in this undeniably paramount region would be a hugely disappointing step backwards. The reason we feel partnering with an organization is so important for this step is because of our position in the world. This means it is virtually inevitable that the proportion of bears denning on the mainland in the Refuge will increase dramatically within the foreseeable future, a phenomenon that only further heightens the value of the Refuge for U.
Yereth Rosen Yereth Rosen was a reporter for Alaska Dispatch News. According to Clough, Patton, and Christiansen 1987 , if caribou cannot freely move to a lower density insect habitat there could be severe consequences of disease or death caused by the insects p. Exploring and drilling for oil may disturb land and marine ecosystems. In order to advocate for change, we plan to conduct further research on the organizations of our choice to learn more about changes they have made to local and global communities and their successes on a local and federal government level. Oil spills can pose threat to the lives of people living within the oil-drilling communities. The list of these violations and the largest spill in 2006 on North Slope 1000 tonnes of crude oil , when the reason was the unwillingness of the company to take adequate measures to protect the pipeline from corrosion. Sadly, as it turns out, this population is facing a very real threat in the face of arctic oil drilling.
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling Pros and Cons
This Earth is so special that we must take care of it. Alex DeMarban Alex DeMarban is a longtime Alaska journalist who covers business, the oil and gas industries and general assignments. And beyond opposition from environmentalists, many people are unlikely to support policies that further increase the profitability of oil companies, which continue to earn record profits while people pay record prices. Oil is often found in remote hostile locations such as Antarctica or the Middle East. I will be analyzing an essay from 1991 entitled The Great Alaskan Debate: Can Oil and Wilderness Mix? Fish and Wildlife Service. Our ability to respond to emergencies and oil spills is severely limited.
Short term energy outlook — U. How would we heat our homes? The group looked into contacting the Audubon Society Alaska, NRDC National Resources Defense Council , Native Movement, and Richard B. If there was an oil spill outside of those protected areas, it remains unknown where that oil would go, but animal populations in the vicinity include polar bears and Which development is more likely to happen? Danger to Animals There is no getting around the fact that drilling is extremely problematic with the natural environment. Oil spills can be difficult and expensive to clean up, and they can have lasting effects on both the environment and local economies. The effect that this temporary increase in oil production will have is modest, attributing to about a 1% decrease in oil prices. Petroleum well drilling in the United States is essential to ensure a stable domestic supply of energy. Department of the Interior, U.
New environmental surveys have been ordered to determine the overall viability of this project. It is predicted that drilling in the Arctic will increase emissions between 0. Then there is the fact that a future administration could ban or block their investment in the future. Musk oxen are year round inhabitants of the 1002 area and therefore would be in the 1002 area during the winter when most of the oil exploration and construction would take place. Drilling is the primary tool for extracting petroleum from rocks in the subsurface. This focus started to change in the 1980s when attitudes during the Reagan administration shifted to conceptual learning, which means that the government would intervene less and look at environmental policies in more of a conceptual manner. Till we have an abundant source of energy that is as readily available, reliable and potent as oil, the dependence will exist.
Drilling in ANWR (Fox: buying, pros and cons, association)
After the Deepwater Horizon spill, President Obama delayed plans by Shell Oil to drill in the Arctic Ocean. However, major spills have been fairly uncommon in Alaska. According to Griffith et al. The federal government in Washington, DC would receive the other portion. Also, boring through the earth can lead to the emission of nitrogen oxides, methane, and other airborne particulate matter that can cause acid rain or smog.
Polar bears in arctic regions use sea ice not only for denning habitat but for crucial hunting grounds of their main prey species: seals. Finally, if drilling is not fully preventable, solution three is to require companies to implement greener drilling technology in order to lessen the impact of any drilling that occurs in the Arctic. If oil is there, it could still take several years for the drilling to release a significantly relevant amount of oil. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from Crowley, P. Why is it important to drill for oil? Although the climate is often challenging, especially near the northern portion above the Arctic Circle, changing the environment to accommodate drilling could disrupt their living patterns. It is obvious that the company relate to safety with frivolous responsibility and negligence.
Essay topics blog: Pros And Cons Of Drilling In The Anwr Region
There is no Guarantee Prospect is a funny business. Available at SSRN: Kotchen. Aas long as they have control, we shall be paying other countries unreal amounts of money just to drive our cars around. Environmentalists seeking to protect the land would likely file lawsuits in an attempt to prevent development activities. Drilling in the refuge would damage the breeding grounds of hundreds of species of migratory birds that connect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to the rest of the United States and all seven continents in their journeys around the world. Caribou graze on the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Any type of displacement from these areas could have a negative impact on muskoxen due to their energy needs and predation.
Impacts of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Over the years, ANWR has been at the crux of intense debate where politicians, industrialists and corporate lobbyists have teamed up at one end and environmentalists with support from various nongovernment organizations have raised the concerns of drilling and exploring oil wells in the region. There is the increased risk of oil spills in the region. Even if we do not achieve this ultimate success, our success includes increased awareness through education, which we achieved simply by giving our presentation at the end of the term. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is one of the most biodiverse regions on the planet. This is a biologically important area, estimated to contain 4.