Ipc 182. IPC 182 in Hindi 2022-10-14

Ipc 182 Rating: 4,7/10 1355 reviews

IPC 182 is a section of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the offense of false information, with intent to cause public mischief. This offense is punishable under Indian law and can carry serious consequences for those found guilty.

Under IPC 182, it is illegal to intentionally give false information to a public servant, with the intention of causing public mischief. Public mischief refers to an act that is intended to cause harm to the public or to disturb the public peace. This could include spreading false rumors or lies about a person or event, with the intent to cause harm or unrest.

In order to be found guilty of this offense, the prosecution must prove that the accused gave false information to a public servant with the intent to cause public mischief. The accused must have had the intention to cause harm or unrest, and must have known that the information they were providing was false.

The punishment for this offense depends on the severity of the harm caused and the intent of the accused. In cases where the false information caused serious harm or unrest, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to six months or a fine, or both. In cases where the false information caused minor harm or unrest, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to one month or a fine, or both.

It is important to note that IPC 182 only applies to false information given to a public servant, and not to false information given to the general public. However, spreading false information to the public can still be considered a criminal offense under other sections of the Indian Penal Code, such as IPC 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) or IPC 505 (statements conducing to public mischief).

In conclusion, IPC 182 is a significant section of the Indian Penal Code that criminalizes the act of giving false information to a public servant with the intention of causing public mischief. This offense carries serious consequences and is punishable under Indian law. It is important for individuals to be aware of this offense and to refrain from spreading false information that could cause harm or unrest to the public.

IPC Section 182

ipc 182

State of Punjab, and set aside a high court judgment, which had directed the Registrar General to make a formal complaint for prosecution under Section 182 of the Indian Penal Code. A has committed an offence under this section. Case of defamation would be a weak case on your part. Ltd के रजिस्टर्ड ट्रेडमार्क है. The Patna High Court has held that where certain members of a political party passed resolutions criticising the administration and the public about their inaction and lack of sense of duty with respect to certain happenings, and copies of the resolutions were sent to different officers and people, section 182 of the Code did not apply. Section 182 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offence of giving false information with an intent to cause a public servant use his lawful power to the injury of another person. .

Next

Section 182 of Indian Penal Code, 1860

ipc 182

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that where a sessions judge rightly acquitted an alleged assailant because though the person lodging the first information report had named him therein he refused to identify him in the court, the sessions judge was not competent to initiate later on proceedings under section 182 of the Code against the person lodging the first information report because the investigating machinery was set in motion by a message received by telephone and also because the first information report was made not to the sub-divisional magistrate but to the police. Filing of false case s will amount to cruelty and hence a ground for divorce. IPC 182 Section — False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person Indian Penal Code IPC 182 Section Whoever gives to any public servant any information which he knows or believes to be false, intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, such public servant— a to do or omit anything which such public servant ought not to do or omit if the true state of facts respecting which such information is given were known by him, or b to use the lawful power of such public servant to the injury or annoyance of any person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Hi my wife complaint to sp that I try to kidnep her and same day file tranfer case to high Court from my city to her city. सारे अधिकार रिजर्व्ड। 0. Illustrations a A informs a Magistrate that Z, a police-officer, subordinate to such Magistrate, has been guilty of neglect of duty or misconduct, knowing such information to be false, and knowing it to be likely that the information will cause the Magistrate to dismiss Z. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with procedure for prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.

Next

धारा 182 क्या है

ipc 182

ADVERTISEMENTS: The information given to the public servant must be with knowledge of its falsity or with belief that it is false, and the giver of the information must either have intention to cause the public servant, or knowledge that it is likely that he would cause the public servant, to do or omit what has been stated in clause a or clause b of the section. A has committed the offence defined in this section. . Classification : This section is Bailable, Non-cognizable and Non-compoundable. Read the Judgment here. He does not mention the name of any person as one of his assailants, but knows it to be likely that in consequence of this information the police will make enquiries and institute searches in the village to the annoyance of the villagers or some of them. The offence under this section is non-cognizable, bailable and non-compoundable, and is triable by any magistrate.

Next

IPC 182 in Hindi

ipc 182

Illustrations a A informs a Magistrate that Z, a police-officer, subordinate to such Magistrate, has been guilty of neglect of duty or misconduct, knowing such information to be false, and knowing it to be likely that the information will cause the Magistrate to dismiss Z. I was also met sp of police that matrimonial cases is going on between the party and I am ready to cooperate with police whenever Cal me but there is no Cal received by me from police. . In Daulat Ram case, the apex court had held that the complaint must be in writing by the public servant concerned, and without that, trial for the offence under Section 182 IPC is without jurisdiction ab initio. Absence of the required intention or knowledge would mean absence of liability of the information giver.


Next

IPC Section 182: False Information, With Intent To Cause Public Servant To Use His Lawful Power To The Injury Of Another Person

ipc 182

The Gujarat High Court is of the opinion ADVERTISEMENTS: Cases The Allahabad High Court refused to convict an accused under this section who had made a false report of a robbery having been committed in his house with a view to suppress certain documents by showing them as having been stolen in the course of that robbery. Definition of IPC 182: False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person. False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person: Giving false information to a public servant with the intention of causing the public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person, has been made an offence under this section. A has committed the offence defined in this section. The Rajasthan High Court is of the opinion that where someone gives a false information against another, alleging that he had committed certain offences, which was found to be false by the police the discharge of the person charged by the Court was naturally correct and the station house officer of the police station was competent to file a complaint under section 182 of the Code against him. A has committed the offence defined in this section.

Next

IPC 182

ipc 182

A bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice AM Sapre observed that such a position is settled in the case of Daulat Ram vs. . Article shared by Legal Provisions of Section 182 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. According to this section, whoever gives to any public servant any information either with the knowledge that it is false, or which he believes to be false, with the intention thereby to cause, or with the knowledge that it is likely that he will thereby cause, such public servant, a either to do or omit anything which such public servant ought not to do or omit if he would have had knowledge about the true state of facts, or b to make use of the lawful power of such public servant to cause either injury or annoyance to any person, shall be punished with simple or rigorous imprisonment for a term extending up to six months, or with fine extending up to one thousand rupees, or with both. A bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice AM Sapre observed that such a position is settled in the case of Daulat. State, has reiterated that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered void ab initio.

Next

Defamation and IPC 182. How to proceed on it ?

ipc 182

The section needs to be understood in the light of section 195 1 a i of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 according to which no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under sections 172 to 188, both inclusive, of the Indian Penal Code, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate. A has committed an offence under this section. A has committed the offence defined in this section. State, has reiterated that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered void ab initio. The Supreme Court, in Saloni Arora vs. Triable By : Any Magistrate Punishment : Imprisonment for 6 months or fine of 1,000 rupees, or both. My question is that can I file a defamation case against my wife or any other criminal caze 343 votes I am sorry to hear that you had to go through all this.

Next

IPC 182 Section of Indian Penal Code

ipc 182

. This article has been made possible because of financial support from. He does not mention the name of any person as one of his assailants, but knows it to be likely that in consequence of this information the police will make enquiries and institute searches in the village to the annoyance of the villagers or some of them. हमारी रिफंड और कैंसलेशन पालिसी देखे LawRato. The section is intended to ensure that public servants are not misled in the performance of their duties. धारा 182 का विवरण भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 182 के अनुसार, जो भी कोई किसी लोक सेवक को कोई ऐसी सूचना, जिसके निराधार होने का उसे ज्ञान या विश्वास है, इस आशय से देगा कि वह उस लोक सेवक को प्रेरित करे या यह सम्भाव्य जानते हुए देगा कि वह उस लोक सेवक को तद्द्वारा प्रेरित करे कि वह -- क कोई ऐसी काम करे या छोड़े जिसे वह लोक सेवक, यदि उसे उस संबंध में, जिसके बारे में ऐसी सूचना दी गई है, तथ्यों की सही स्थिति का पता होता तो न करता या छोड़ता, अथवा ख ऐसे लोक सेवक की विधिपूर्ण शक्ति का उपयोग करे जिस उपयोग से किसी व्यक्ति को क्षति या क्षोभ हो, तो उसे किसी एक अवधि के लिए कारावास की सजा जिसे छह महीने तक बढ़ाया जा सकता है, या एक हजार रुपए तक का आर्थिक दंड, या दोनों से, दण्डित किया जाएगा । लागू अपराध गैरकानूनी जनसमूह का सदस्य होना सजा - छह महीने कारावास या एक हजार रुपए तक का आर्थिक दंड या दोनों । यह एक जमानती, गैर-संज्ञेय अपराध है और किसी भी मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा विचारणीय है। यह अपराध समझौता करने योग्य नहीं है। LawRato. Yes, you can file criminal case under 182 IPC and other provisions too can't be ascertained through given facts.

Next