The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of executing individuals who have been convicted of certain crimes. While it has been practiced for centuries, it remains a controversial and divisive issue, with many arguing that it is a barbaric and inhumane form of punishment that should be abolished.
One of the main arguments against the death penalty is that it is irrevocable and cannot be undone. This means that if someone is wrongly convicted and sentenced to death, there is no way to correct the mistake. The risk of executing an innocent person is particularly high given the fallibility of the criminal justice system, which has been shown to disproportionately impact marginalized and disadvantaged groups. The death penalty also disproportionately affects people of color, with research showing that people of color are more likely to be sentenced to death than white people for similar crimes.
Another argument against the death penalty is that it does not serve as a deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the death penalty does not have a greater deterrent effect on crime than other forms of punishment, such as life imprisonment. This suggests that the death penalty is not an effective way to reduce crime and that other methods, such as rehabilitation and prevention programs, may be more effective in addressing the root causes of crime.
In addition to its lack of deterrent effect, the death penalty is also much more expensive than life imprisonment. The process of seeking the death penalty, including the trial, appeals, and execution, is costly and often takes much longer than a life sentence. This money could be better spent on other forms of crime prevention and rehabilitation programs that have been shown to be more effective at reducing crime and recidivism.
Finally, the death penalty is often seen as a form of state-sanctioned violence that is incompatible with the values of a civilized society. Many argue that it is wrong for the state to take a life, regardless of the circumstances, and that it is our moral obligation to respect the inherent dignity of all human beings.
In conclusion, the death penalty is a controversial and divisive issue that has many valid arguments against it. It is irrevocable and carries the risk of executing an innocent person, it is not an effective deterrent to crime, it is more expensive than life imprisonment, and it is incompatible with the values of a civilized society. Given these and other concerns, it is clear that the death penalty should be abolished and that alternative forms of punishment, such as life imprisonment, should be considered as a more humane and effective way to address crime.
Against Death penalty Essay Sample, 1122 Words, 3 Pages 🤓
There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right. And since death penalty is the most dreaded form of punishment, death penalty is the most severe form of punishment. This is because the memory and the futile hope that somehow one day in future their imprisoned family member will be set free, keeps torturing them throughout their lives. A lot of time passes due to legal procedures before an execution actually takes place. For example, a serial murderer should be killed because by killing other people deliberately, they should also be killed because by killing other people, they are wishing, as it were, to be also killed.
Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty: Why It Should Be Abolished: [Essay Example], 677 words GradesFixer
It is considerably costly to the taxpayer owing to the extensive procedures and process involved. The study stated that for each inmate executed three to eighteen murders are prevented Liptak, 2007. Eventually, the line must be drawn somewhere, but where? However, despite the complexity and sensitivity of the topic, most countries have discontinued this policy due to ethical and economical reasons. If we ought to give them death sentence as punishment,then what distinguishes us from the criminals? It has been a back and forth argument over decades on rather or not we should instill the death penalty. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. The cause of this has made 19 States to make the death penalty illegal. Humanity is founded on the very concept of respecting life Mandery, 2012.
Ethical Arguments Against The Death Penalty
For the ten years prior, the murder rates in the state without the death penalty have been consistently lower and even. Honor Theses, 6, 1-86. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. With the death penalty, people experience the same thoughts because they feel as if they are responsible for putting a person to death even though they did nothing but what the court or their jobs asked of them. By committing crimes, retribution theory of justice holds, the criminals are inviting upon themselves punishment that is proportionate to the crime that they commit Bowers, 4. Such strong moral objections bring in to question why such an outdated method of dealing with criminals is still legal in thirty-one states. The Supreme Court has taken Argumentative Against Death Penalty murder.
Argumentative Against Death Penalty
However, that claim is born out of ignorance. Conducting a single death sentence, whether through lethal injection or some other humane way is an extremely costly procedure. Death on humans is immsensely inhumane, even animals are killed at ease with no pain. Works Cited "Another Reason to Abolish the Death Penalty. Crime and Justice, 38 1 , 1-63. Although there are some studies that tend to refute this fact, there are, however numerous studies that corroborate this fact.
