Arguements for animal testing. Arguments For and Against Animal Testing in the US 2022-10-19
Arguements for animal testing Rating:
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to the use of animals in scientific and medical research, product testing, and education. The practice has been a source of controversy for decades, with some arguing that it is necessary for the advancement of science and medicine, while others believe it is unethical and unnecessary. In this essay, we will examine some of the arguments for animal testing.
One of the main arguments in favor of animal testing is that it has contributed significantly to the development of new drugs, treatments, and therapies that have saved countless lives. For example, animal testing has played a crucial role in the development of vaccines for diseases such as polio, measles, and influenza, as well as the development of treatments for cancer, heart disease, and other life-threatening conditions. Without the use of animal models, it would be much more difficult, if not impossible, to study the safety and effectiveness of these treatments and to understand how they work.
Another argument for animal testing is that it allows scientists to study complex biological processes that cannot be easily studied in other ways. For example, it is often difficult to study the effects of a particular drug on the human body, as there are many factors that can influence the results. By using animals as test subjects, scientists can better control for these variables and study the effects of a drug more accurately. Additionally, animal models can help scientists understand the underlying mechanisms of diseases, which can help to identify potential therapeutic targets and develop new treatments.
A third argument for animal testing is that it is strictly regulated and subject to strict guidelines to ensure the welfare of the animals involved. In the United States, for example, the Animal Welfare Act requires that researchers follow specific guidelines for the care and use of animals in research, including provisions for housing, nutrition, and veterinary care. Additionally, many research institutions have their own animal care and use committees that review and approve all animal research proposals to ensure that they are ethically and scientifically sound.
Despite these arguments, animal testing remains a controversial practice, and there are those who argue that it is unnecessary and unethical. Some critics argue that there are alternative methods, such as in vitro or computer modeling, that can be used to study the effects of drugs and diseases without the need for animal testing. Others argue that the suffering and death of animals for the benefit of humans is wrong, regardless of the potential benefits.
In conclusion, animal testing has played a significant role in the development of new drugs and treatments and in the understanding of complex biological processes. While it is strictly regulated and subject to guidelines to ensure the welfare of the animals involved, it remains a controversial practice and is opposed by those who believe that it is unnecessary and unethical. Ultimately, the decision to use animals in research is a complex one that requires a balancing of the potential benefits with ethical considerations.
Animal Testing Pros and Cons: Arguments For & Against It
Epidemiological and clinical studies have determined that most cancers are caused by smoking and by eating high-fat foods, foods high in animal protein, and foods containing artificial colors and other harmful additives. Therefore, to sum it all up, animal testing should be legalized because it assists researchers in medical treatments besides drugs discovery, improves health and medicine and is able to test the safety of drugs. Animal testing The practice of using the animal for testing has been debated for over decades, the animal testing debate has about if it is morally right or wrong to use animal during experiments. Even though human welfare is the main concern, the welfare of an animal is still taken into account by minimizing the suffering of animals when conducting animal experimentations. No matter how many tests on animals are undertaken, someone will always be the first human to be tested on. Now a days, scientists are using animals for their research and testings, and I disagree with the use of animals.
Animal testing is necessary and essential for medical progress, and it is useful for our knowledge of most diseases. Many are decades old and depict old fashioned labs and practices that are no longer condoned today. Vaccines tested on animals have saved millions of animals that would otherwise have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus. For the longest time, no adequate alternative could match the complex systems found within humans and animals. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.
Laws like the 6. They test these products on animals so they don't have to test it on humans, but i think that it would be better if they tested it on humans who volunteered to test these products instead of some innocent animal. Without animal research diabetics would not have access to lifesaving These are not the only examples, lifesaving leukemia treatments, antibiotics and anesthetics have, amongst other advances, It is not just humans who benefit from testing. This statement is insufficient to justify the drawbacks of animal testing Derbyshire, 2004. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease.
However, with the help of modern knowledge and animal-right, humans can reduce this pain in animals. The Pros And Cons Of The Animal Welfare Act 763 Words 4 Pages Simply stated, critics arguments that lab animals are protected by federal law is a manipulated version of the story: society's only efforts to protect animals are tepid attempts as we allow lab animals to be tortured without any compensation. Computer modeling, robotics, 3-D modeling, 7. Researchers use procedures that cause the animals a lot of pain and suffering: injection with drugs, hole-drilling through skulls, extraction of muscle tissues and organs, seizures, crashing of the spinal cord, and the insertion of test objects into the animals throats Rocklinsberg et al. The Existence of Alternatives Scientists have developed alternative methods that can be used to test products and drugs, as well as replace animals as experimental objects. The reverse is also true.
Immunizations against such devastating diseases as rubella, diphtheria and polio, for example, have become available because of animal tests that were conducted to find cure for these diseases Trull, 2002, p. The reason why animals testing is so important for scientist and ultimately human race is because, animals testing allow the progress of life saving treatment for humans and animals. Since laws have been implemented, scientists are taking precautions to prevent animal cruelty. An animal testing argumentative essay always mentions the benefit of reducing the number of errors and fatal mistakes owing to a round of tests on animals. In fact, many of the most important advances in health are attributable to human studies, including the discovery of the relationships between cholesterol and heart disease and smoking and cancer, the development of X-rays, and the isolation of the AIDS virus. Recent developments in government regulations have also dealt with the problem on issues of cruelty on laboratory animals.
While the arguments for using animals in research are strong; the argument that it is cruel and unnecessary in many cases is also strong. Because of that, animal testing is once again proved essential. Because the AWA specifically excludes rats, mice, birds, and cold-blooded animals, more than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not even covered by the minimal protection provided by federal laws. Moreover, these non- animal methods are still being developed which necessitates that testings must continue to be done to an intact living system which is an animal Guither, 1998, p. Get Help With Your Essay If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help! Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped.
What Are The Arguments For And Against Animal Testing...
Established in 1898, Cruelty Free International is firmly rooted in the early social justice movement and has a long and inspiring history. Animal testing and research, for example, are necessary for veterinary institutions to come up with ways to prevent animal diseases. Related article: Animal testing is one of the most controversial aspects of modern-day science. Animals have physiological and biological similarities to human Some animals share a surprisingly high amount of DNA with human beings. This percentage is proof of how much animal experimentation has increased in the last 15 years.
An Argument Favoring the Use of Animals in Testing and the Benefits It Has Brought: [Essay Example], 562 words GradesFixer
Poor animal care is not good science. Studies have shown that newly-developed computer models are accurate in predicting how new drugs will react with the human body Kojima et al. In addition, the models can accurately simulate human biology and disease progression through various stages. This is because of the terrible care that animals are being put through, people debate about whether animal testing should happen at all. So animal testing should be legalized in order to save more human lives. The argument also ignores the reasoning ability of many animals, including pigs who demonstrate measurably sophisticated approaches to solving problems and primates who not only use tools but also teach their offspring how to use them. One of the most common animal studies is called the ld50 test.
Indeed, in many laboratories, animals are handled roughly—even for routine monitoring procedures that fall outside the realm of an experimental protocol—and this only heightens their fear and stress. Allow for examination of a complete life cycle Human beings live an estimated 70 years. The British Royal Society has released a statement regarding animal research, noting that almost every 20th century medical achievement relied on the use of animals in some way during the development process. Bountiful Harvest: Technology, Food Safety, and the Environment. Concurrently, supporters of animal experimentation were able to refute their arguments, by claiming the welfare of humans should always come first before animals. In conjunction with this, the experiments will not be repeated or animals used will be euthanized when brutal treatment is involved.
Drugs that are tested safe can then be used to save millions of valuable human lives. A survey of 4,451 experimental cancer drugs developed between 2003 and 2011 found that more than 93 percent failed after entering the first phase of human clinical trials, even though all had been tested successfully on animals. Furthermore, animals such as mice and rabbits usually reproduce very quickly. The discovery of knowledge will be delayed or remain undiscovered if animal testing is not carried out. Between 1900 and 2000, life expectancy in the United States increased from 47 to 77 years. Opponents of animal testing argue that scientists infringe on animal rights by breeding them in unconducive living environments and subjecting them to procedures that cause stress and suffering Rocklinsberg et al. Our augmented reality experience will show you.