Constitutional principles individual rights thematic essay. Constitutional Principles 2022-10-19

Constitutional Principles

As you can see, throughout United States history, many different groups of people have faced discrimination. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform… The Importance Of Individual Rights In The United States Our society has many rules that every individual is required to follow. However, being said that she has been working for four years and 364 days, the scenario is 100% unfair and self-discriminating. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson began his Removal Policy and attempted to force all Native Americans from their homes, to west of the Mississippi River. The federal and state governments have taken actions that have either protected or limited the rights of these groups in American society.

Free Essay: Constitutional Principles

The decision hit a climax in the Supreme Court case of Korematsu VS United States where the court upheld the evacuation as a reasonable wartime emergency measure. Many citizens of America feared that the Japanese would send Japanese spies into America. This Supreme Court ruling limited the rights of the Japanese Americans because they took away their freedom to simply live where they want and forced them to live in military-like conditions for an unjust reason. The federal and state governments have taken actions that have either protected or limited the rights of these groups in American society. In both cases, the group of people were forced to relocate to a different area against their will.

The Native Americans have been forced to deal with this new culture moving in by embracing the heritage, combining the two, or fighting back with violence. After the attack by Japan, many Americans feared that Japanese Americans, called Nisei, were a threat to national security. . No acts of Japanese-American treason were ever found which proves even further that the government had no good reason to relocate and entire group of people. Two examples of groups that faced discrimination are Native American Indians and Japanese Americans. As you can see, throughout United States history, many different groups of people have faced discrimination. This brought a lot of racial discrimination against Japanese-Americans.

Ever since we settled here on this land, we have pushed aside the Native Americans to make room for expansion. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson began his Removal Policy and attempted to force all Native Americans from their homes, to west of the Mississippi River. The study that was found in Utopia was said to be too new to be fully evaluated, meaning, Inga should not have been fired until at least further evidence of this study was said to be accurate, if anything. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? The Supreme Court case became known as Worcester v. Despite the plethora of writings in place regarding the injustices that the Native Americans endured during the Trail of Tears very little attention has been given to why the people of that time would allow this forced removal to take place. In Worcester vs Georgia, the court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority over the territory but Georgia ignored the ruling.

The United States Army rounded up the Cherokee and forced them to march west in a movement called the Trail of Tears. The Native Americans have been forced to deal with this new culture moving in by embracing the heritage, combining the two, or fighting back with violence. In both cases, theses groups have had their natural rights violated and were forced to move from their homes. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. In an attempt to prevent the state of Georgia from taking their land from them, the Cherokee tribe went to court.

The Indian Removal Act was a law that stated that Native Americans that were settled east of the Mississippi River had to move west of the river to a portion of land that was set aside for them in the Oklahoma territory. Two examples of groups that faced discrimination are Native American Indians and Japanese Americans. Two examples of this are Native Americans and Japanese Americans. Giving into the fear in 1942, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which established military zones for the imprisonment of Japanese Americans. Over 100,000 people of Japanese decent were forced to leave their homes and enter the WRA Camps; military style barracks set up by the Wartime Relocation Authority that was barb-wired and guarded by troops. The decision hit a climax in the Supreme Court case of Korematsu VS United States where the court upheld the evacuation as a reasonable wartime emergency measure.

Giving into the fear in 1942, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which established military zones for the imprisonment of Japanese Americans. The Cherokee Indians that were settled in Georgia became angry with the law and decided to sue the state of Georgia, because they felt like they were entitled to the land. Some people may think individual rights are more important but I am certain that society is way more important because it keeps order in the U. Constitutional Principles- Individual Rights Throughout United States history, various groups have faced discrimination. It was won by the Indians and the law was proven unconstitutional.

But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. No acts of Japanese-American treason were ever found which proves even further that the government had no good reason to relocate and entire group of people. They were treated like enemy aliens and the discrimination they faced was insane. The federal and state governments have taken actions that have either protected or limited the rights of these groups in American society.

The Supreme Court even took cases for the issues and upheld the unconstitutional movement both times. This Supreme Court ruling limited the rights of the Japanese Americans because they took away their freedom to simply live where they want and forced them to live in military-like conditions for an unjust reason. After the attack by Japan, many Americans feared that Japanese Americans, called Nisei, were a threat to national security. They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. The Trail of Tears is a movement that limited the rights of the Native Americans. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court.

Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. The Native Americans were forced out of their homes and had to march west, while the Japanese Americans had to leave their homes and relocate to a military barrack. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. Another group that has faced discrimination were women after the attack Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II. President Jackson chose to ignore the results of the case and carry on wih the law, causing the Trail of Tears. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. In both cases, theses groups have had their natural rights violated and were forced to move from their homes.