Homosexuality nurture or nature. Homosexuality: nature or nurture? 2022-10-28
Homosexuality nurture or nature Rating:
6,9/10
769
reviews
Homosexuality is a topic that has been debated for centuries. Some people believe that it is a natural and inherent part of a person's identity, while others argue that it is a result of environmental and social influences. In this essay, we will explore both sides of this debate and consider the evidence for and against both nature and nurture as explanations for homosexuality.
One of the main arguments for the nature side of the debate is that there is evidence of same-sex attraction and behavior in many different species of animals. For example, same-sex behavior has been observed in dolphins, elephants, and primates, suggesting that it is a natural and normal part of animal behavior. In humans, there is also evidence that same-sex attraction may have a genetic basis. For example, studies have shown that there is a higher prevalence of same-sex attraction in people who have certain genetic markers or who have a certain number of copies of certain genes.
However, it is important to note that the link between genetics and homosexuality is complex and not fully understood. While there may be some genetic factors that contribute to same-sex attraction, it is likely that a combination of genetic and environmental factors play a role in the development of an individual's sexual orientation. In other words, it is not solely determined by genetics, but rather is influenced by a range of factors.
On the nurture side of the debate, some people argue that homosexuality is a result of environmental and social influences. For example, it has been suggested that parenting style, family dynamics, and experiences during childhood may play a role in the development of an individual's sexual orientation. While there is some research supporting these claims, it is important to note that the evidence is not conclusive.
Overall, it is clear that the question of whether homosexuality is a result of nature or nurture is complex and not fully understood. While there is evidence to support both sides of the debate, it is likely that a combination of genetic, environmental, and social factors contribute to the development of an individual's sexual orientation. Ultimately, the most important thing is to respect and accept people for who they are, regardless of their sexual orientation.
is homosexuality nurture or nature? : DeepThoughts
. Classical Twin Studies While pair-wise concordance gives an intuitive indication of the genetic influence on homosexuality as expressed in identical twins, it does not provide information on what factors may provide the remaining, non-genetic influence. They just have to keep themselves pure. He did agree with Neale that the debate is now closed on whether any single gene is responsible for sexual orientation. As with other things, nothing in human nature is so simple that one can say ALL situations follow the same rules, so I suppose it is possible to learn homosexual behaviour and adapt to accepting it, but in general, it seems that there are recognizable genetically defined traits that usually accompany homosexual orientation.
Like had i not had that experience i would still be putting more stock in my conditioned preference. Everyone thought I was gay, and insults were being thrown left and right. Further research provides additional evidence to link homosexuality to nature is. If this same male fetus then receives sufficient testosterone during the stage determining sexual identity, his brain would likely cause him to identify as a male and because of the lack of testosterone during the sexual desire stage would still seek out men as a sexual partners. The target has to possess features that arouse the recruiter. Therefore, rather unsurprisingly, these centrists are attacked from both sides of the debate on human sexuality.
What Twin Studies Tell Us about Homosexuality: Nature vs. Nurture
Altho it is very very important to note that some people are not ever, worried, when simply trying to understand how others think. Although, nurture can be a slight influence, it is not a determinant. And the theory is if a particular trait is genetic, the identical twins would be more alike than the fraternal twins. Seems to me there are many other ways to outrage your family and flip off society than to choose that lifestyle. There is a subset of gay individuals who have more than one relative in their family that is also gay. Just hanging around girls. If kleptomania is proven to be genetic, should we accept demands by organized kleptomaniacs to legalize and even honor their compulsive thievery? These kinds of studies have continued through the years, going as far as pinpointing a gene on the X chromosome — Xq28 — as the culprit.
I haven't looked up anything on this subject, but last I saw and heard, the old nature vs nurture arguments on any subject are bogus and relics of the past as scientists understand now that both nature and nurture are required to determine how genes will code and determine protein formation. . It was here in 2004 where the two housed male penguins successfully coupled for over six years. Homosexuals who are Twins. The real scientists have yet to weigh in with any factual data that proves things either way.
The history of homosexuality includes centuries of defining the behavior as deviant, and punishing those who partake. . In the old days if your kid was learning homosexual. Once the brain forms a group, it keeps adding to it new members as they occur. If you want to learn something I recommend the Bailey et al. Certain auditory circuitries are innately tuned to distinguish between the voices of men and women.
For example, there are some animals, such as the hamster that are known to kill and eat their offspring in times of stress Camuti. Its caused by the Satan-illuminati agenda, CIA brainwashing, and letting young men play with dolls when they are young also comic books. The youngsters have acquired those traits subconsciously, on their own, during childhood, by just being embedded in the society in which they grew up. They found that if one identical twin was gay, 52 percent of the time the other was also; the figure was 22 percent for fraternal twins, and only 5 percent for nonrelated adopted brothers. The church felt so strongly about the matter that it forbade homosexual sex, as well as extramarital sex, non-procreative sex within marriage, and often masturbation. One can only assume that there must be something wrong with them. The most powerful weapon in the homosexual special rights arsenal is the victim status.
Nature Arguments It is sometimes claimed that people can be naturally homosexual. Is it possible that their social influences and environment can lead them to certain sexual practices and same sex relationships or could it be that some people have a genetic makeup that makes it completely natural to be attracted to members of the same sex? However, she could not prove that homosexuality is caused because of psychological development or an illness leaving her with no correlation. Parents play an important role in socializing children and ensuring adherence to the right societal norms and values. If my sexuality is genetic, then there also has to be a gene that explains the behavior of those involved in beastiality and sex with children even infants. Those molecules are picked up and recognized by innate organs of the second partner. A brief history of homosexuality As has been frequently noted, the ancient Greeks did not have terms or concepts that correspond to the contemporary dichotomy of homosexual and heterosexual.
There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms
This is analogous to learning processes in other animals. When I was 12, I never knew what the big deal was about women on baywatch. Genome sequencing took decades to slowly mature into what it is today, and twins alone cannot represent the genetic complexity of our species. . . The recent study by Zietsch, et al. A control would be identical twins raised together versus identical twins raised apart, in sufficient numbers so as to form a usable sample.
She grew up very loved. Nurturing is conditioning, and undoing it still has the same results, ie, getting back to natural state. If they encouage hetrosexuality. Furthermore, the non-shared, post-natal environmental contribution to homosexuality is moderate to strong, around 64%-78%, has a relatively small standard deviation and is consistently around the same percentage 6 , indicating that homosexuality is influenced primarily by post-natal environmental factors and experiences that are not directly related to prenatal, biological contributions of any kind or combination. The Pyschologist leader of this study rightly said he is unqualified to make a genetic statement on the subject.
However, I don't think the learn to be hetero or homosexual, I believe that it is simply the hormonal changes with adolescence that bring out their natural orientation when what would be the natural mechanisms to drive reproduction are most powerful. . Every theory Nurture presented still lack the studies to prove them to be anything but just speculations. I have no doubt orientation is genetic — how it is expressed, lived is nurture. But society also, as an after-effect, forces people into repression when something isn't labeled as 'normal' to prevent oppression and slander.
