Biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials are two types of substances that have significant impacts on the environment. Biodegradable materials are those that can be broken down, decomposed, and returned to the environment through natural processes. Non-biodegradable materials, on the other hand, do not break down and remain in the environment indefinitely. In this essay, we will explore the differences between biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials and their effects on the environment.
Biodegradable materials are organic substances that can be decomposed by microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi. Examples of biodegradable materials include food waste, paper, and wood. These materials are an important part of the natural cycle of life as they are broken down and returned to the soil, providing nutrients for plants to grow.
On the other hand, non-biodegradable materials are synthetic substances that do not break down and remain in the environment indefinitely. Examples of non-biodegradable materials include plastic, metal, and glass. These materials do not provide any nutrients to the soil and can remain in the environment for hundreds of years.
The main difference between biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials is their impact on the environment. Biodegradable materials are a natural and sustainable part of the environment, while non-biodegradable materials can have negative impacts on the environment. For example, plastic is a common non-biodegradable material that has become a major environmental problem. Plastic waste can litter the land, water, and air, harming wildlife and polluting the environment. It can also take hundreds of years to break down, leading to long-term pollution.
In contrast, biodegradable materials can be a more sustainable and environmentally friendly choice. They can be composted and turned into nutrient-rich soil, helping to reduce waste and benefit the environment.
Overall, biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials have significant differences and impacts on the environment. While biodegradable materials can be a sustainable and natural part of the environment, non-biodegradable materials can have negative impacts on the environment and should be used with caution.
Vroom’s Expectancy Theory
People recycle paper because they believe it is vital to conserve resources and take a stand on environmental issues valence. During his academic courses and his career as a professor, Victor Vroom studied the various factors which affect the performance of an organisation such as, leadership, motivation and performance efficiency. The Vroom-Yetton model is created to help us to find out the best decision-making approach and leadership style based on your current situation. In spite of the criticism and assumptions made in the Vroom expectancy theory, it stands out as an important model of motivation which can be used to form a management plan for an organisation, to increase employee motivation, with the help of other tools, such as proper supervision, communication, and evaluation. The Vroom-Yetton-Jago model is a contingency approach to group decision making that is designed specifically to help leaders select the best approach to making decisions. Improves productivity, improving quality, improvement in motivation and commitment.
Vroom's Expectancy Theory
After all, who would be motivated to work hard on something that is doomed to fail? Victor Harold Vroom was born in Montreal Canada and is a business school professor at Yale School of management. The model identifies different ways a decision can be made by considering the degree of follower participation. The vroom expectancy theory propounded that the work effort of an individual is directed towards the expected behavior that leads to desired outcomes. Perhaps surveying team members to establish which types of reward they most value could be useful in improving overall motivation? The following constructs of the self-efficacy theory that impact attitudes and intentions to perform: past experience or mastery with the task, vicarious experience performing the task, emotional or physiological arousal regarding the task, and social persuasion to perform the task. Finally, the actions generated by the individual were generated by the preferred outcome and expectation of the individual. This model says to us, no single decision-making process fits in every scenario. Hence, the employees, in an effort to pursue the reward shall increase their effort and performance.
Expectancy Theory of Motivation (Vroom)
Only by examining their natural talent, one can find their voice, something that interests them and makes them happy. The Vroom Jago leadership model relates leadership behavior and participation to decision making. When individuals believe they have some kind of control over how, when, and why rewards are distributed, Instrumentality tends to increase. Managers can motivate employees by understanding and modifying the scenario such that the amount of effort will relate directly to the amount of reward received and that the reward received is valued by the employee. The democratic manager: Shares opinions and ideas, Has complete confidence and trust in their staff, Allows staff to participate in making decisions, Motivates by reward for achieving goals set by participation.