Nature vs nurture debate examples. Nature vs Nurture Psychology Debate 2022-10-24
Nature vs nurture debate examples Rating:
The nature vs nurture debate is a longstanding discussion in the field of psychology that aims to understand the relative influences of inherited traits (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) on human development and behavior. This debate has been ongoing for centuries, with scientists and philosophers weighing in on both sides of the argument.
One example of the nature vs nurture debate can be seen in the development of intelligence. Some researchers argue that intelligence is largely inherited and is determined by genetic factors. These individuals support the nature side of the debate, arguing that intelligence is largely predetermined at birth and cannot be significantly changed by environmental factors. Others, however, argue that intelligence is largely influenced by environmental factors such as education, nutrition, and access to resources. These individuals support the nurture side of the debate, arguing that intelligence is malleable and can be significantly impacted by the experiences and opportunities an individual has throughout their life.
Another example of the nature vs nurture debate can be seen in the development of personality. Some researchers argue that personality is largely inherited and is determined by genetic factors. These individuals support the nature side of the debate, arguing that personality is largely predetermined at birth and cannot be significantly changed by environmental factors. Others, however, argue that personality is largely influenced by environmental factors such as parenting styles, cultural values, and life experiences. These individuals support the nurture side of the debate, arguing that personality is malleable and can be significantly impacted by the experiences and opportunities an individual has throughout their life.
It is important to note that the nature vs nurture debate is not a simple either/or proposition. Researchers now recognize that both nature and nurture play a role in human development and behavior, and that the relative influence of each can vary depending on the trait or behavior in question. For example, research has shown that intelligence is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with some studies estimating that genetic factors account for around 50% of the variance in intelligence. Similarly, research has shown that personality is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with some studies estimating that genetic factors account for around 40% of the variance in personality.
In conclusion, the nature vs nurture debate is a complex and multifaceted discussion that has been ongoing for centuries. While both nature and nurture play a role in human development and behavior, the relative influence of each can vary depending on the trait or behavior in question. It is important for researchers to continue to study and understand the interplay between nature and nurture in order to better understand the factors that shape human development and behavior.
The Nature Vs Nurture: Human Growth And Development
However, how much each factor, the environment and genetics, play a role is still uncertain. In general, the earlier a particular ability appears, the more likely it is to be under the influence of genetic factors. Be kind to people in the gay community. Saying that people who have more than other often leads to discrimination and inequality. Another example of nature is Freud's theory of aggression as being an innate drive called Thanatos.
Similar studies were done with children who had biological parents who had a criminality history. Jose Ortega Y Gassett. So what exactly are the relative contributions of nature and nurture? Some kids get blue eyes from their parents, being able to play instruments and have an atheistic talent often comes for genes or traits pasted down from family members. Someone with down syndrome inherited an extra chromosome, the extra chromosome can result in development skills. Over a short period both groups adapted to their roles especially guards. A child who was adopted into a functional family was only 12% at risk of showing criminal behavior in their adulthood. Then nurture would be what they have experienced or have picked up from peers or their adopted families.
Identical twins develop from a single fertilized egg and they have the same genome. But do we see organized activist alcoholics demanding the right to get roaring drunk every night, the right to drive while drunk, and the right to be protected from the consequences of their behavior when they are drunk? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16 1 , 117-125. The results showed that 32% of the juveniles had affectionless psychopathy, meaning they were unable to show any emotion towards others. We are born with 46 chromosomes that we inherit from each of our parents. People select, modify and create environments correlated with their genetic disposition.
The case study I am doing is the one about the three identical strangers. He found that a cluster of brain neurons known as INAH3 was twice as large in heterosexual men as it was in homosexuals. Does a person acquire the risk of high blood pressure or become obese merely because the parent developed the same risk? Epigenetic effects can sometimes be passed from one generation to the next, although the effects only seem to last for a few generations. Biological and behavioral processes involve particularly complex systems. He is showing normal youth rebellion as he is a teenager and is maybe struggling to find his own identity and self-worth. Therefore, some people are born with a more superior genetic makeup than others McLeod, 2007.
Identical twins who were separated at birth still show a lot of similarities, and that happens with a lot of twins. Children who see aggression tend to imitate what they have observed, therefore causing aggressive behaviors from the child themselves p. This implies frustration when not displaced the right way can lead to aggression being directed at an innocent target. Similar studies were done with children who had biological parents who had a criminality history. The other 19 began smoking at a very young age and smoked two packs a day until they died.
Is there one answer that is more correct than the other? If traits such as humor, are environmentally influenced, then does that not mean that many of our other traits that make up who we are, may be environmentally influenced as well? Some changes in males will include pubic hair growing, as well as facial hair growing, and their voice deepens. Whether we let our surroundings influence us or just going along with our natural traits. You are absolutely, completely, and utterly destroying the pro-life movement when you post articles like this. These two influences can combine to produce a general incapability to handle stress well p. This could mean he has influenced his findings to match his expectations.
Nature Vs. Nurture : The Debate Of Nature Versus Nurture
These two researchers published a study of twins raised in the same homes. This is how the nature versus nurture debate first began. In my second paragraph when with the studies that were done on the children who had been adopted into different environments, the nurture that a person gets determines who they are. For example, in Epigenetics is the term used to describe inheritance by mechanisms other than through the DNA sequence of genes. A study was done on adoptees with biological parents that have schizophrenic.
The nativist approach essentially espouses the nature side of the argument. Nature versus nurture has been a debate that involves human behavior, and determiners whether it has to do with the environment one is born in or something that was inherited. The recent Nature Genetics,is the result of the collaboration between Dr. If Peter participated in sport, he would be releasing his aggressiveness leading him to be overall less aggressive. Other examples include environmental stress and its effect on depression. He covered variables by controlling the time children observed the model and the gender of the model.
Brain wave tests and many other tests also gave the same results. Nature is often known as the hormone-based behaviors, genetics, disposition, and traits that have been inherited. Nurture to me is greater than nature. Some might say that it is your genes that have the greatest influence in controlling your personality and preferences. Banduras experiment gave accurate representation of how behaviour can be learnt and copied by children. McEldowney 2018 Thomas Bouchard carried out a study on identical twins the Jim Twins, separated at birth and raised by two different families, 39 years later they met. .
This means if a young child loses connection or receives little interaction or care from their mother it can lead to delinquency, development issues and affectionless psychopathy. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group. It is equally relevant to the psychology of Polygenic Inheritance Polygenic Inheritance Rather than the presence or absence of single genes being the determining factor that accounts for psychological traits, behavioral genetics has demonstrated that multiple genes — often thousands, collectively contribute to specific behaviors. Boys imitated more aggressive acts than girls although there was little difference in verbal aggression. He believes this is due to the novelty value of the doll.