Should animals be used for scientific research pros and cons. What is Animal Testing 2022-10-02
Should animals be used for scientific research pros and cons Rating:
4,4/10
519
reviews
An example of a speech essay could be a persuasive speech designed to convince the audience to take a specific action, such as signing a petition or volunteering for a cause. The essay could outline the main points of the speech, including the purpose and goal of the speech, the intended audience, and the specific arguments and evidence that will be presented.
In the introduction, the essay could provide background information on the issue being addressed and explain why it is important. The body of the essay could then outline the main points of the speech, including any statistics, examples, or personal anecdotes that will be used to support the argument. Finally, the conclusion could summarize the main points and call the audience to action, encouraging them to take the steps necessary to make a positive difference.
Overall, a speech essay is a useful tool for organizing and structuring a persuasive speech, and can help the speaker effectively convey their message to the audience. By outlining the main points and supporting evidence in advance, the speaker can ensure that their message is clear and well-supported, and that they are able to effectively persuade their audience to take the desired action.
14 Pros and Cons of Animal Research
Animal research has played a vital part in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade. Like vaccines for other diseases, the COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States as of March 2021 were approved for emergency use based in part on results of experiments on animals including mice, rats, hamsters, and monkeys. It provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle. The start of animal testing started in the seventeenth century in the United Kingdom Murnaghan, Ian. Animal research has also helped in developing treatments for cancer. Should Animals Be Used In Flowers For Algernon By Daniel Keys 465 Words 2 Pages There is much controversy over whether or not animals should be used to test new procedures and medications. Many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.
Is it worth it that animals should be captured for their lifetime and euthanized for the benefit of humans? Through animal research, the legality of accidentally causing the death of an animal is very different than what would occur with the accidental death of a human. Therefore, in order to improve our knowledge regarding those bacteria and viruses, it is crucial that we engage in testing those germs on other living organisms like animals. There is much controversy surrounding the issue not only within biology, but general ethics as well. Others argue that there are alternatives to animal testing that are just as effective, if not more so. In order for a new medicine to be developed, it must first be proven safe and effective in animal trials. To ignore human and animal suffering is irresponsible and unethical. Animal research supporter strongly believe that animals unlock the key to curing and ailing diseases.
Tara Rabin, Public Affairs Specialist at the Food and Drug Administration, as quoted in a Sep. To prepare future physicians for the work they will perform throughout their careers, medical training must be human-focused, not animal-focused, because there are many substantial differences across species. Thus, in those countries, animal testing may not serve as a valid research method and researchers have to find other testing methods instead. This site should be used as a source. List of Cons of Animal Testing for Medical Reasons 1. Thus, animal research may significantly help us humans to further improve our medical knowledge and our treatment methods over time.
Should Animals Be Used For Research Argumentative Essay Essay on Animal testing, Medicine
Animal testing was the reason for the development of Herceptin and tamoxifen. Animal testing — taken here to suggest using animals to research additional human issues like medication efficacy and the safety of items like makeup — is a job fraught with controversy and complicated ethical arguments. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. Humane Society International HIS and other global cooperation companies and government authorities are working deliberately to stop harsh and obsolete animal-poisoning tests performed on animals. As they were monsters, they were difficult to classify.
One reason is that there are no alternative methods that can mimic the whole human body. In comparison, a mouse has a lifespan of 2-3 years, allowing researchers the opportunity to study through research and experimentation how something may affect the life cycle. As such, the article focuses on alternative methods that can effectively replace animal testing. Would you still buy this perfume? Important to find treatment for many serious diseases in the future The state of the world will always be changing and in order to adapt to those changes, it is crucial that also our research continues to improve over time. These animals are helping to further the development in knowledge and cures for these disabilities and diseases. To protect research companies and other commercial enterprises vulnerable to animal rights violence, Congress passed the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act of 2006.
However, those veterinarians may only be able to treat the disease properly if they have access to proper research findings regarding what has helped in animal trials and what should be avoided. Critics of in vitro methods argue that operating on a live animal provides more accurate data because the effects on the entire organism can be observed. Who knows if they use anesthesia safely. There are so many reasons why animals should not be used for scientific research. This has not only been true in the past, but will continue to be true also in the future of humanity. Animal research through animal experimentation has been an integral part of medical research.
Pro & Con Quotes: Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?
Yes, this system is inhuman, unethical, and simply morally wrong, but always remember, we all agree to disagree. Conclusion However, as many people are opposed to the use of animals in research, many lives have been saved every year due to their death. California: University of California Press, 1986. Using human cell cultures to test toxicity yields 76-84% accurate prediction, illuminates specific organ damage, and other more meaningful results than animal tests which hover around 46-50% accuracy, literally no better than a coin flip. Scientists rather would have toxic side effects appear on animals rather than the drug appearing on the market with people unaware that the drug is actually harmful.
Pros and Cons of Using Animals for Commercial and Scientific Testing, Annotated Bibliography Download Example
But when it comes to the right of animals, there are particular things that you might consider thinking. Animal testing may happen over once and for months, which means it might incur extra expenses. Safety improvements for customers Before products are approved for the mass market, plenty of research and testing has to be done in order to ensure the safety of products. Many of our medical discoveries such ad antibiotics, CAT scans, aspirin, and anesthetics have been developed from nonanimal experiments. Lack of suitable alternative testing methods When it comes to the testing of certain drugs or vaccines, there is simply a lack of suitable alternatives.
The law has effectively made it impossible for Class B dealers to obtain licenses to sell cats or dogs for research purposes. Alternatives to Animal Testing Animal rights advocates and members of the scientific community have pushed for the use of alternatives to animal experimentation. However, in order to find vaccines that may protect us against bacteria of various sorts, plenty of research has to be carried out. Yet, there are also many issues related to it. The first argument, that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, is not valid. What is animal testing? Animal Testing Pros Animal Testing Cons May help to increase our life expectancy Problematic from an ethical perspective Invention of new medicines Animal research can be cruel Better understanding regarding certain bacteria May not be justifiable Animal testing can help to find new vaccines Many animals have to die May prevent the spread of pandemics Results can not be transferred on humans 1:1 Protection of customers Strict regulations may prevent animal testing May help to find treatment for future diseases May be quite inefficient Had been useful during human history Animal experiments can be expensive May also help for the treatment of animals Long-term effects still unclear Lack of alternatives Humans should not play god Should We Use Animal Research? A worldwide decrease in the supply of primates used in research coincided with increased demand during research for a vaccine for COVID-19. Scientists usually use animals for testing, since they believe them like people.
These insights offer major benefits to both human and animal health. Why is the use of animals in scientific experimentation morally permissible? The term vivisection, however, is typically used by opponents of animal experimentation and avoided by scientists. Animal testing occurs before human testing. Finding new medical treatments is extremely important, but sometimes people abuse their rights and resort to unnecessary and dangerous tactics to find solutions. Even if they were, or even if some were coerced to do so say prisoners or terminally ill patients , would we really want to move our society in that direction? The disadvantage of animal research is that it lessens the value of life.
