Anti cloning arguments. Arguments Against Cloning 2022-10-14
Anti cloning arguments Rating:
9,5/10
389
reviews
Cloning is the process of creating a genetically identical copy of an individual. It has the potential to revolutionize medicine and agriculture, but it also raises significant ethical concerns. In this essay, I will discuss some of the arguments against cloning.
One of the main arguments against cloning is that it could lead to a loss of diversity in the gene pool. If cloning becomes widespread, it could lead to a situation where a small number of genetically identical individuals are used as sources for clones, which would result in a significant reduction in the genetic diversity of the population. This lack of diversity could have negative consequences for the long-term survival of the species, as it would make the population more vulnerable to disease and other environmental pressures.
Another argument against cloning is that it could lead to the creation of "designer babies." If parents are able to choose the traits of their offspring through cloning, it could lead to a society where people are selected for certain traits, such as intelligence or physical attractiveness. This could create a society where people are judged based on their genetic makeup, rather than their character or accomplishments.
A third argument against cloning is that it raises questions about the identity and individuality of the clones. If an individual is cloned, is the clone an exact copy of the original, or is it a separate individual with its own identity and personality? This raises complex philosophical and ethical questions about the nature of identity and individuality, and it could lead to confusion and conflict within society.
Finally, cloning raises concerns about the safety of the process. While researchers have made significant progress in cloning technology, there are still significant risks involved in the process. Clones are often born with defects or other health problems, and there is a risk that the cloning process could have unintended consequences on the genetic makeup of the clone.
In conclusion, while cloning has the potential to revolutionize medicine and agriculture, it also raises significant ethical concerns. These include a loss of genetic diversity, the creation of "designer babies," questions about identity and individuality, and concerns about the safety of the process. These concerns should be carefully considered before any decisions are made about the use of cloning technology.
Arguments Against Cloning
Cloned children would thus be the first human beings whose entire genetic makeup is selected in advance. We do so for several reasons. Children born of this process stand equally beside their progenitors as fellow human beings, not beneath them as made objects. Human cloning creates two or more individuals with the same genetic profile. There are at least some circumstances where reproductive freedom must be limited to protect the good of the child as, for instance, with the ban on incest. The form of bioethical inquiry we are attempting here will make every effort not to truncate the moral meaning of our actions and practices by placing them on the Procrustean bed of utilitarianism. We can pass strong laws making reproductive cloning illegal without banning research cloning.
But these precedents pale in comparison to the degree of control provided by cloning and, in any case, do not thereby provide a license to proceed with cloning. These are the crucial points to review. For that matter, how can you believe in a BOOK. What about replacing an aged body with a new body by transplanting the human brain? I also think that on the "God" issue that this would be a real test. Say he became quadriplegic, Scientists have said that there is a possibility that new spinal cord cells can be made and walking again is an option. By putting yourself as your own greatest being in an non-conceited way you are able to control and handle your life the way you should, and you are responsible for all your actions.
If society wishes to ban inheritable genetic modification it can and should do so. There is a general rule in the humankind that says those who have power will do whatever it takes to maintain it. Here are three reasons why we should say no to 1. In order to overcome the immune rejection problems associated with organ and tissue transplants, stem cells would have to be obtained from embryos produced from a patient's own cells, by means of research cloning. But this would be blasfomouse wouldn't it? One possible result would be the industrialization and commercialization of human reproduction.
Objections and Arguments Against Cloning Essay Example
There is even the possibility of this science devaluing human life. The processes behind human cloning would help us to understand more about these abnormalities, and then correct them to prevent future losses. Advocating a moratorium on research cloning does not preclude support for continued work to overcome the technical difficulties. Cloning used to just be used for other things in the environment, but it is slowly making itself known in our Three Reasons Why Cloning Should Not Be Allowed Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of a human being. Human cloning could adapt our population to changing planetary conditions.
Another scientific argument is that genetic diversity helps provide the "pool" of variations available for a robust human population. If the resultant beings will generally have lives worth living there is a prima facie case for allowing cloning. When we reach this new plateau, there will be several philosophical and moral questions that each person must answer on their own. Problems of Exploitation of Women and Just Distribution of Risk Cloning-to-produce-children may also lead to the exploitation of women who would be called upon to donate oocytes. Although the clone would be a different individual, some parents may not treat them as such. Not all the important issues can be squeezed into the categories of harms and benefits. What Im trying to say is that with cloning life, this earth and us as humans will lose our identity as a whole race.
Reasons For and Against Human Cloning « Phil for Humanity
Think of some of the complications that may arise. The animal data suggest that late-term fetal losses and spontaneous abortions occur substantially more often with cloned fetuses than in natural pregnancies. And then, of course, IVF was accomplished. These codes and regulations were formulated in direct response to serious ethical lapses and violations committed by research scientists against the rights and dignity of individual human beings. Sprains or strains to a ligament will typically heal in 4 to 6 weeks with rest, but when a tear occurs, the primary treatment option especially with an ACL is to apply a tissue graft at a steeper angle to encourage the healing process. But with experimentation and experience, seriously unequal prospects between cloned and noncloned people should erode.
It would therefore be morally questionable, at the very least, to choose to impose potentially grave harm on an individual, especially in the very act of giving that individual life. Cloned children may experience concerns about their distinctive identity not only because each will be genetically essentially identical to another human being, but also because they may resemble in appearance younger versions of the person who is their "father" or "mother. It would violate deeply and widely held convictions concerning human individuality and freedom, and could lead to a devaluation of clones in comparison with non-clones. Therefore, no one should have any expectations from cloned people. With …show more content… Then from there the baby will be born with the image that God had created. Therapeutic cloning might provide medical information that we can use in the future, but the costs may be too high to see any advantages happening from this process. Our fuller assessment begins with an attempt to fathom the deepest meaning of human procreation and thus necessarily the meaning of raising children.
Human cloning, they argue, offers a new method for human control and self-improvement, by allowing families to have children free of specific genetic diseases or society to reproduce children with superior genetic endowments. In taking up the application of these codes to the case of cloning-to-produce-children, we would suggest that the proper approach is not simply to discover specific places where human cloning violates this or that stipulation of this or that code, but to grapple with how such cloning offends the spirit of these codes and what they seek to defend. Thus, anticipating the possibility of a perfected and usable technology, it is important to delineate the case against the practice itself. It could create shifts in our society that alter the very way we approach the unforeseen moments of life. God and all the other ma in religions are creation story's and ways so that we can see life has a meaning and a higher purpouse but it doesn't we are just moving along in space like normal elements and particles of dust. But a clone is a genetic near-copy of a person who is already living or has already lived.
There are processes that these cells perform naturally, allowing them to be manipulated by doctors to repair diseased or damage to organs and tissues. In a free society, people have the right to pursue any scientific-and especially medical-investigation. Policy and social changes that protect lesbian and gay families are a much more pressing need. While it will always unethical to kill another human being to save another person, what if the cloned human body replacement did not have a brain and was intentionally designed that way from the beginning? There will always be physical risks to humans associated with the artificial cloning process. Our analysis will then move onto questions dealing with the effects of cloning on individuals, family life, and society more generally. For example, if no genetic match could be found for a sick child needing a kidney or bone marrow transplant, and the parents had planned to have another child, cloning could potentially serve the human goods of beginning a new life and saving an existing one. This concern can be expressed not only in language about the relation between the generations but also in the language of equality.
