A literature review is a critical analysis of the existing research on a particular topic. It is an essential part of any research project as it helps to contextualize the research and situate it within the larger body of knowledge on the topic. Writing a literature review can be a challenging task, especially for those who are new to the process. However, with some careful planning and organization, it is possible to write a comprehensive and well-written literature review. Here are some tips to help you get started:
Define your research question or topic: The first step in writing a literature review is to define the research question or topic that you are interested in. This will help you to focus your review and ensure that you are only including relevant literature.
Search for relevant literature: Once you have defined your research question or topic, the next step is to search for relevant literature. This can be done through a variety of sources, such as databases, libraries, and online sources. Make sure to search for both primary and secondary sources, as well as both published and unpublished materials.
Read and evaluate the literature: As you begin to read and evaluate the literature, it is important to take good notes and keep track of your sources. This will help you to remember important details and make it easier to write your review. As you read, consider the following questions:
What are the main arguments or findings of the study?
What methods were used to collect the data?
Are the results supported by the data?
What are the limitations or weaknesses of the study?
Organize the literature: Once you have read and evaluated the literature, it is important to organize it in a logical and coherent manner. One common way to organize a literature review is to group the studies by theme or topic. Alternatively, you can organize the literature chronologically or by research method.
Write the review: Once you have organized the literature, it is time to begin writing your review. Start by introducing the research question or topic and providing some background information. Next, summarize the main findings and arguments of the studies you have reviewed. Finally, conclude your review by discussing the implications of the literature and any future directions for research.
In summary, writing a literature review requires careful planning and organization. By defining your research question, searching for relevant literature, reading and evaluating the literature, and organizing and writing your review, you can produce a comprehensive and well-written review that adds to the existing body of knowledge on your topic.
The economic causes of the American Civil War (1861-1865) were rooted in the differences between the Northern and Southern states. The North, with its industrial and urban centers, had a diversified economy that was driven by manufacturing, trade, and finance. The South, on the other hand, was primarily an agricultural region that relied on slave labor to produce cash crops such as cotton, tobacco, and sugar.
One of the main economic differences between the North and South was the system of labor. The North had a more diverse workforce, with a mix of wage laborers, small farmers, and industrial workers. The South, on the other hand, relied heavily on slave labor to work the fields and plantations. Slaves were considered property, and their value was often measured in terms of how much work they could do.
Another significant economic difference between the North and South was the level of investment in infrastructure. The North had a well-developed system of roads, canals, and railroads, which facilitated trade and commerce. The South, however, had a much less developed infrastructure, which made it difficult to transport goods to market.
The economic differences between the North and South were not just a result of different economic systems, but also reflected deeper cultural and political differences. The North was more industrialized and urbanized, and was generally more supportive of federal government intervention in the economy. The South, on the other hand, was more agrarian and rural, and was generally more skeptical of federal intervention.
The economic differences between the North and South were one of the key factors that led to the Civil War. The North wanted to preserve the Union and end slavery, while the South wanted to maintain its way of life and protect its economic interests. The war ultimately ended with the defeat of the Confederacy and the abolition of slavery, but the economic tensions between the North and South continue to shape American politics and society to this day.
. The poem itself begins as if various oppositions will be maintained and developed. Such meanings are not, of course, inherent in landscapes. Coleridge uses images such asa waning moonwas haunted bya woman wailing for her demon loverThis image of a woman bound to evil brings the dark side of the supposed utopia to light. The tribal bands would come together whenever an outside force posed some impending danger, but their need for mobility as nomadic peoples generally prohibited any stronger or more lasting associations because of the nature of their lifestyles. Graves's interpretation is found in his book, The Meaning of Dreams London, 1924 , pp. Coleridge London: Humphrey Milford, 1931.
The Self is in the center surrounded by images representative of the consciousness in the inner circle. Coleridge Including the Dramas of Wallenstein Remorse, and Zapolya 3 vols. The second date is today's date — the date you are citing the material. Kathleen Coburn, 3 double vols. But when I look again, It is thine own calm home, thy crystal shrine, Thy habitation from eternity! I, iii, v Coleridge's incense-bearing trees, sinuous rills and domesticated forests are anticipated in the soporific lotus-land of stanza iii. She was Magna Mater, the Great Mother, giving birth to all there is on earth, to the gods as well as to vegetation.
To understand the importance of the change, knowledge of the events that preceded the shift have to be noted. Stewart, Essays on the Spot Boston and New York, 1910 , pp. Using these definitions it is clear that Coleridge wrote with a very Romantic state of mind. The citation above will include either 2 or 3 dates. But in spite of this conviction I should like to regard the poem as a more consciously contrived work of art than John Beer in Coleridge the Visionary and some other critics do.
Analysis of Kubla Khan by Samuel Taylor Coleridge Essay
Only two changes need be mentioned here to illustrate this. The literary allusion, too, suggests the work of the fancy, again functioning at the lowest stage of the creative process, although more briefly than in the dreamvision. It begins in the Karst region, where it is known as the Poik, submerges and flows through the Adelsberg grotto, surfaces near Planina, where it is known as the Unz, submerges once again, and appears at last on the surface near Oberlaibach. To claim as much would be to succumb to the aesthetic seduction of these six beautiful, highly rhetorical lines. Though Kubla Khan is not an angel, he is a marvellous and powerful emperor, and his construct hovers above the deep sublime chasms of Xanadu as a decree of genius, both glorious and potentially dangerous.
Denn was hat er davon, wenn das, was er für das Bessere erkennt, nicht noch bei seinen Lebzeiten das Bessere wird? In Milton the landscape is neutral, a field on which forces of good and evil will contend; Coleridge works the allegory to a symbolic fusion as he makes the landscape of Xanadu itself the figure of moral ambiguity. The chasm of chaos is referring to hell. Whether or not Coleridge made such associations, the notebook entries which follow that on Thales continue the theme of generation. This explication will identify and critique Thomas' tone, imagery including metaphors and expressive language as it contributes to the power of the poem. Up to this point, whatever may be said of our conclusions, the facts on which they rest admit no question.
His flashing eyes, his floating hair! Wordsworth besides makes an interesting mention to the river in the line. Kublai was ruler of the Mongols from 1260-1294. Yet it might at first sight be supposed by those who are engaged in the bustle of business, exposed to the dangers of war, or involved in the mazes of political intrigue, that the habits and pursuits of a gentleman author are peculiarly favorable to content of mind, and to the repose of all the afflicting passions. On waking he wondered why he should have dreamt of this man. Review of Christabel; Kubla Khan, A Vision; The Pains of Sleep, by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. It may even emanate from a person with no pretentions to holiness or even to virtue.
Dylan Thomas's 'Fern Hill. The first, which contains three stanzas, describes Xanadu as if Coleridge is actually there, experiencing the place first hand. It is an example of the squaring of the circle and, as such, of the temenos which offers sanctuary to the ego and protection from annihilation by the unconscious. Press, 1964 , p. See also Shelton, p. In the prose headnote, it would be to the account of the presumed opium vision and the interrupted task of poetic transcription that stanzas one and two generally correspond.
Symbolism In Kubla Khan, By Samuel Taylor Coleridge
It is left to the interpreter the Wedding-Guest, in the first instance, and then the reader to decide whether the Mariner's words are prompted by a good or an evil daemon, much as it is left to Hamlet to decide whether the spirit that appears to him in his father's form is an angelic spirit or a goblin damn'd. This alludes to an important aspect of the poems theme, man verses nature. I quote Taylor's translation only because Coleridge had probably read it. The second part of the poem is filled with longing to be in Xanadu, but Coleridge is unable to capture the experience again. At the same time I should like to take up the question of the features that are common to Cublai and Cybele, by which the two could have been initially more easily confused with each other.
Essay About: Samuel Taylor Coleridge And Kubla Khan
I heard footsteps crunching in the snow beneath my open window as I lay in bed last night, and instantly I was back in a room in the Hotel Vapore in Venice, where, all through a hot midsummer night twelve years ago, disembodied, furtive footsteps padded and slunk and shambled at intervals, like uncanny spawnings of the night, along the Merceria just beneath another open, window. Sir James Frazer, The Golden Bough: Adonis, Attis, Osiris, London 1936, vol. And on the maps of Odoardus and the Arabic geographer engraved on the same plate, the river's maziness rivals that of the Dædalian labyrinth. The following year Coleridge's fears were partially realized by the landing of another small French force, this time in Ireland to support a rebellion. And at the end, when the earth shall melt with fervent heat, the water that are under the earth, pent up and turned to steam, will lend their shattering aid again, to bring about the last catastrophe.