Order 6 rule 17 cpc judgments. What is amendment of pleadings under order 6 rule 17 of CPC? 2022-10-19
Order 6 rule 17 cpc judgments Rating:
5,9/10
1540
reviews
Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) deals with the provision for amendment of pleadings. This rule allows for the amendment of pleadings at any stage of the proceedings, subject to the discretion of the court.
Pleadings refer to the written statements made by the parties to a lawsuit, setting out their respective positions and contentions. These include the plaint, which is the statement of claim made by the plaintiff, and the written statement, which is the response by the defendant.
The purpose of allowing for amendment of pleadings is to ensure that justice is done and that the parties have a fair opportunity to present their case. This is because circumstances may arise during the course of the proceedings where it becomes necessary to make changes to the pleadings in order to accurately reflect the facts of the case.
However, the court has the discretion to grant or reject an application for amendment of pleadings based on various considerations. These include the possibility of causing prejudice to the other party, the stage of the proceedings, and the effect on the rights of the parties.
In order to amend pleadings, the party seeking the amendment must make an application to the court, stating the grounds for the amendment and the proposed changes. The other party may object to the amendment, and the court will consider the arguments of both parties before making a decision.
If the court allows the amendment, it may impose conditions, such as allowing the other party additional time to respond or requiring the payment of costs. The court may also disallow the amendment if it is found to be frivolous or made in bad faith.
In summary, Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC provides for the amendment of pleadings at any stage of the proceedings, subject to the discretion of the court. This is to ensure that the parties have a fair opportunity to present their case and that justice is done. However, the court may impose conditions or disallow the amendment if it is found to be frivolous or made in bad faith.
CPC
The court could allow amendment of pleadings at any stage of the proceedings. Similarly, another application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code was also filed by the respondent under Order By the impugned order in Alok Kumar Lodha v. Mohan, Justice, Courts and Delays 2009. The contention that they had no knowledge of the facts stated therein and the respondents could not gather the materials and information necessary for drafting proper written statement earlier was rejected, stating: ". Amendment of Pleadings:- The Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties: Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial".
Further regarding husband of defendant No. The court's jurisdiction, in a case of this nature is limited. In his evidence, S. Ahuja, Learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents on the ground that the case of the respondents was well supported by the fact that the lawyer Shri S. The Bench placed reliance on precedents laid down by the Supreme Court, and thus held, "There is no finding by the Court that the Court is satisfied in spite of due diligence, the party could not introduce amendment before the commencement of the trial, the order of the Trial Judge is unsustainable. When you start to follow those forms you will become the master of the pleadings. The trial Court framed issues on the basis of the pleadings in the suit.
It puts an embargo on exercise of its jurisdiction. Kiran Appaso Swami and Orsprovided that both are considered differently when it comes to amending. Pleading "Pleading", shall mean plaint or written statement. The pleading is a primary element of the court, essentially pleading means A written statement made by the parties to the action, and a pleading may be a complaint, a reply. Yes space of this site is available for experts for making their comments but will it not be fair for replying for the same if the reply is supported by preposition of law supported with case law in this regard. The limitation can be ground for rejecting the application but the court can allow if the court thinks that amendment is necessary.
But if the request for amendment was submitted with the intention of mala fide, then the court will refuse. Head Note: Citations: 1 2009 2 SCC 409 2 2008 5 SCC 117 3 2006 6 SCC 498 4 2005 4 SCC 480 5 2005 6 SCC 344 JUDGMENT: Zaheerabad Municipality, the respondent herein filed O. The Trial Court rightly found the story of payment of Rs. Address for service of notice 1 Every pleading, when filed by a party, shall be accompanied by a statement in the prescribed form, signed as provided in rule 14, regarding the address of the party. Slight correction as to the boundaries was also attempted. .
We have very carefully perused the records of the Courts below since the judgment of the High Court is laconic. It was only as regards the election petitions, that the Supreme Court held in categorical terms that the trial in those cases can commence even before the issues are settled. The suit was contested by the respondents-defendants. ROHINI GOEL Special Leave Petition C No. Similarly, though Order VI Rule 17 is definitely not a right of the parties and can be granted only at the discretion of the Court, it has still been used arbitrarily with a malicious intention to delay civil proceedings so as to make the cause of action time-barred under the Limitation Act. Order 6 CPC Description Order VI PLEADINGS GENERALLY 1.
Free Case Law On Amendment of Pleadings (Order 6 Rule 17)
Pleadings play an important role is determining the outcome of a case by enabling the plaintiff to establish the justification for legal action and for the defendant to prove his defense accordingly in a civil suit. Such address for service furnished by the party, unless a change therein has been notified to the Court by filing a memorandum to that effect, shall be presumed to be his correct address for service for purposes of suit, any appeal or revision or other proceeding directed against the decree or Order passed in that suit, when a memorandum of change of address is filed by any party, a note to that effect shall be made in the cause title of the pleading and if the pleading happens to be the written statement also in the cause title of the plaint. Coming to the facts of the present case, it is not in dispute that the recording of evidence has not commenced in the suit. Hari Shankar observed that the use of word "shall" later in Order VI Rule 17 is mandatory in nature. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, would submit that in view of the proviso appended to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code, the High Court committed a serious illegality in passing the impugned judgment. Parties should avoid using irrelevant or immaterial statements while drafting the Plaint.
One wonders as to when was the suit filed and when did the Court issue a summons and how is it that on the same day, the Written Statement was also ready, duly drafted by the other side lawyer S. In the case of Gouri Dutt Ganesh Lal Firm v. Joshi had stepped into the witness box in the subsequent suit and had reiterated that the appellant had consented and instructed him and it was only as per the instructions of the appellant that he had prepared her Written Statement in the first suit. As a plaintiff, he submits his pleadings in writing and attaches all the necessary documents to the pleadings which are a relay to his lawsuit. EMAAR MGF Land Ltd. But it also had a total bar introduced by a proviso which prevented any application for amendment to be allowed after the trial had commenced unless the court came to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of the trial.
What is amendment of pleadings under order 6 rule 17 of CPC?
An institution of the suit is necessary for applying for amendment of pleadings. Â Why Order 6 Rule 17 is been criticized? The unamended rule provided for the manner in which "evidence" is to be taken. And if in such case the person so pleading desires to rely in the alternative upon more contracts or relations than one as to be implied from such circumstances, he may state the same in the alternative. There shall be no order as to costs. Plaint is the statements filed by the Plaintiff in a Civil Court to prove his claim whereas Written statements are the statements defined in Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC which states that defendant should file written statements in 30 days from the date of issuance of the summons.
Amendments of Pleadings is a good law to correct mistakes in pleadings but it should be allowed with due care and diligence. Pleadings are the foundations of the lawsuit. However, when a party seeks an amendment of pleading regarding constructive res judicata, the Civil Court must reject such application. Forms of pleading The forms in Appendix A when applicable, and where they are not applicable forms of the like character, nearly as may be, shall be used for all pleadings. The words "due diligence" has not been defined in the Code. In the case of Gurdial Singh v. Taking clue from this, the respondent filed I.
Order VI Rule 17 For Amendment Of Pleadings Do Not Apply To Section 34 Petitions Under Arbitration Act: Madras High Court
The word that is employed in different Rules of Order IX C. What are the Pleadings? There would not be much of difficulty in understanding the judgments rendered in cases where the applications for amendment have been filed half way through the recording of evidence of the witnesses, or thereafter. The safest approach seems to be that the trial of the suit can be said to have commenced when the trial Court makes the chief-examination of the first witness in the suit presented in the form of an affidavit, as part of record, after verification of its content, and on an examination of the documents mentioned therein from the point of view of admissibility, and when such witness is available for cross-examination by the opposite party. Nothing has been shown to us in the nature of an order passed by the Court on the basis of the so-called Caveat. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VI Rule 16. Before the Parliament amended the C.
