Evaluation of leadership theories. Leadership Theories 2022-10-09
Evaluation of leadership theories
Leadership theories are frameworks that help to understand and analyze the characteristics and behaviors of effective leaders. There are many different leadership theories that have been developed over the years, each with its own unique perspective on what makes a leader effective. In this essay, we will evaluate several of these leadership theories in order to understand their strengths and limitations.
One well-known leadership theory is the trait theory, which suggests that effective leaders possess certain inherent traits or qualities that enable them to lead effectively. These traits might include charisma, intelligence, confidence, and decisiveness. While the trait theory has been useful in identifying some of the key qualities that effective leaders tend to possess, it has also been criticized for being overly simplistic and not taking into account the complex and dynamic nature of leadership.
Another leadership theory is the transformational leadership theory, which emphasizes the importance of leaders inspiring and motivating their followers to achieve shared goals. Transformational leaders are seen as being able to inspire their followers to go beyond their own self-interest and work towards a greater good. This theory has been widely influential and has been applied in a variety of settings, including businesses, political organizations, and educational institutions. However, it has also been criticized for being too idealistic and not taking into account the practical realities of leading and managing people.
A third leadership theory is the contingency theory, which suggests that the most effective leadership style depends on the specific situation and the needs of the followers. According to this theory, leaders must be flexible and adapt their leadership style to fit the needs of their followers in order to be effective. This theory has been useful in highlighting the importance of context in leadership, but it has also been criticized for being too complex and not providing clear guidance for leaders.
Overall, leadership theories can be useful tools for understanding and analyzing leadership, but they also have their limitations. It is important to consider the strengths and limitations of each theory and to recognize that effective leadership involves a complex interplay of factors that cannot be fully captured by any single theory.
Evaluation of Leadership childhealthpolicy.vumc.org
Finally we will examine an organizational example where participative leadership was used effectively. The relationship theory of leadership focuses on leaders who are mainly concerned about their interactions with others. To elaborate leadership models and competency frame work we can describe in through following examples. Most military personnel have had to write an evaluation for their subordinates at one time or another. Transactional Theory and Transformational Theory Bass 2006 says that transformational leaders always influence their followers and get respect and admiration.
Evaluation of Leadership Theories
Employees maximize their productivity and become transparent in supporting leaders following a culture of trust and openness. The candidate provides a reasonable description, with limited detail, of the organization and its objective s. Studies show that this kind of leadership behavior can be the most effective for many employees. Authentic leaders show honesty and openness through clear communication of their feelings and motives. This style encourages employees to work with more efforts.
Leadership Theories and Styles
Communicative Skills: A leader should have effective communication skills; he should communicate clearly and precisely. This theory is not without criticism however—some suggest that this type of style makes leaders appear weak or unnecessary. Over the years, there have been several efforts to understand leadership and develop a framework for effective leadership. Leadership Practices The candidate provides a reasonable description, with substantial detail, of 3 leadership practices of the current primary leader of the existing organization. I can admit that sometimes I get lost in my work and forget about the things that really matter and the bigger picture.
Critical evaluation of leadership theories
. The leader lacks ethics such as post-conventional morality that requires an individual to decide based on a social contract on what is suitable for society Northouse, 2019, 490. Autocratic Leadership style: In these style leaders uses downwards communication style from leaders to subordinates. Leaders who share their powers, such as decision-making with followers, make them feel part of the goals and vision. I knew leader B some eight months before joining Him after merging my company to gain scale.
Critical Evaluation of Leadership and Management childhealthpolicy.vumc.org
The candidate provides a reasonable description, with adequate detail, of 3 leadership practices of the primary leader of the organization. Every theory have some assumption with it, traits theory have following assumptions associated with it; it says that it is assumed that leaders are born with inherit traits, these traits are part of their own personalities and which distinguish them from others, the good leaders adopt some of traits and skills by the time they become leaders. Reasonable balance of breadth and depth achieved. There are internal and external factors that impact a leader and their situation. My first encounter with the leader made me identify with his agenda, charisma, and motivation to take the company to greater heights.
Evaluation of Leadership Theories
I have experienced low confidence towards leader B following his failure to respond to my question on my position in 2, 3, and 10 years after joining the company. Words: 398 - Pages: 2 Premium Essay Managing Projects. Leadership involves influencing a group of individuals who have a common purpose. Since planned change first introduced by Kurt Lewin, lots of models have been developed. Transformational leaders influence through role modeling, where they engage followers in structuring vision and decision making.
Leadership Theories and Evaluation
Path-Goal theory can be defined as this is all about leaders who motivate their followers to accomplish the goals and tasks asked them to complete Rowe, W. Distributing leadership shifts the position from being a follower to a leader, making employees loyal to organizational goals in their behaviors and tasks. The same concept applies to communities, So, what makes leaders who they are? The theory is used to predict effective leadership. She works to help this employee understand how they fit within the organization, encourage them to be open about questions and problems, and create a positive working relationship. The managerial sector is purely lead by the effective and efficient employees who are employed as managers to guide the rest of the staff. Some of his skills are born, but some of them he adopts from the day life and from past experiences.
Some identification of the different issues but limited evaluation or analysis. . However, by going through the article, anyone can get an exact idea on leadership management. Their sole purpose must be that they work what they have asked to do. And leadership theories help explain how leaders harness and develop these traits. The authors explain a transformation leader that stimulates and motivates employees has the ability to achieve astonishing outcomes and improve their leadership capability. Effects of Current Leadership The candidate.
The authentic leadership model demonstrates that trust is a significant feature towards effective control of followers Northouse, 2019, 308. The great man theory of leadership, sometimes called the trait theory, suggests that good leaders are born. The leaders play social roles in attracting employees to commit their interests to those of the company. Enhanced processing is always welcomed in our organization. A sense of truth is vital to objective judgment on right and wrong, leading to morally good decisions. Awareness: A good leader is always proves good leader when he keep looking his strengths and weakness, he must overcome on his weakness as soon as possible to present himself well aware leader.