Examination in cheif. Examination in chief 2022-10-31
Examination in cheif Rating:
Examination in chief is a legal term used in the context of a trial or legal proceeding. It refers to the questioning of a witness by the lawyer representing the party that called the witness to testify. The purpose of examination in chief is to establish the witness's credibility and to elicit testimony that supports the position of the party calling the witness.
During examination in chief, the lawyer asking the questions will typically guide the witness through a series of questions designed to establish the witness's credibility and to elicit testimony that supports the case of the party calling the witness. The lawyer may ask the witness to describe their background and qualifications, to provide details about the events in question, and to explain their observations and actions. The lawyer may also ask the witness to provide supporting documents or other evidence to bolster the witness's testimony.
Examination in chief is an important part of the legal process, as it allows the party calling the witness to present their case to the court or tribunal and to establish the facts of the case. It is also an opportunity for the witness to explain their side of the story and to provide context and details that may not be apparent from the documents or other evidence presented in the case.
After the examination in chief is complete, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. During cross-examination, the opposing lawyer will attempt to challenge the witness's credibility and to undermine the testimony given during examination in chief. The opposing lawyer may ask leading or antagonistic questions, and may use a variety of tactics to try to discredit the witness or to present a different version of events.
Overall, examination in chief is an essential part of the legal process, and it plays a crucial role in establishing the facts and determining the outcome of a case. It allows the parties involved to present their cases to the court or tribunal and to challenge the testimony and evidence of the opposing side.
Examination in Chief
During this examination, the party calling the witness or his advocate, will seek to elicit evidence which supports his version of the facts in issue. Mirror some of the good characteristics of the witness. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher. It is this Act that generally defines examination-in-chief and sets out the conduct of the same in various provisions. Then, at trial, the lawyer has to get out of the way of the relationship between the jury and the client. Deflate the potential cross-examination. This will enhance the quality of their evidence.
Examination in chief legal definition of examination in chief
If for instance evidence has not been adduced for a robbery that took place in Mr. The Theme of the Case. What needs to be determined is the fact that not undermining the defects of the examination in chief, is there an alternative? There are other legal provision of the Indian Evidence Act which are applicable here and are referred to in the later part of the project. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors. Leading questions are forbidden in examination-in-chief because the solicitor is not allowed to lead their witness and in effect put words into their mouth.
So do questions that are vague and ambiguous. I kept six honest serving men. Art Of Preparing A Structure For Examination In Chief: 1. It is subtle because a good chief examination focuses entirely on the witness and their evidence. The author can be reached at: How To Submit Your Article:. But in the entire scenario, what seems to be missing is the sense of justice involved. But such a repetition must be in such a way the opponent cannot object to the repetition.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. Whereas the witness should be memorable, the lawyer should not. The Rules of Evidence and the Need for Objections C The Direct Examination: 1. They taught me all I knew. In the adversarial system of our country, it becomes a tool of extracting truth from the facts. Chief examination is sophisticated advocacy because during its course counsel is actually presenting their case, while trying to satisfy a multitude of objectives, such as maximizing the potential of each witness to present all relevant evidence in as logical, credible, persuasive and accurate manner as possible, while knitting all witnesses' evidence together in a coherent fashion in order to prove all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Conversely, use the arguments that you want to make at the end of the case to guide you in planning and preparing the questions you will ask on examination in chief. Legalities involved in Examination in Chief a A question based on supposition of fact not proved is improper. The questions should be written in the lingo of the ear, not the eye. Unlike cross-examination, there is very little written material to guide practitioners through the examination of their own witnesses. Accept and close Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp Examining Witnesses — Examination-in-chief Examination-in-chief This is where you obtain evidence from your own witnesses.
Maintaining eye contact is necessary. Conclusion An examination in chief must appear fresh, interesting, flowing, and conversational. Examination in Chief thus becomes a starting point for any litigation. The hostile witness can be asked leading questions with the permission of the court. Always therefore bear in mind why you are asking your witness a particular question and what is you want to hear from them. The party calling this witness can ask the Judge to grant leave to treat them as a hostile witness.
Their names were what and why and when And how and where and who - - Rudyard Kipling Introduction It's been said, "A good lawyer turns evidence into fact and fact into truth. Conclusion An examination in chief must appear fresh, interesting, flowing, and conversational. You should instead try to get the witness out of the witness box as soon as possible. Examination in Chief is also known as Direct Examination. EXAMINATION IN CHIEF Definition and Statutory Basis Trials are all about establishing the veracity of facts in issue to establish or discredit any matter before the court.
One needs to inter relate the witnesses to make it easy for the judges. Examination in Chief is one of the most subtle and sophisticated forms of advocacy. Wrottesley, Examination of Witnesses in Court, 3rd Ed. The Form of the Question. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. Avoid questions that suggest the answer to your witness.
Conversely, use the arguments that you want to make at the end of the case to guide you in planning and preparing the questions you will ask on examination in chief. The weight given to an answer from a leading question will depend on "how leading the question was, the subject matter and other evidence before the Court. They taught me all I knew. The questions should be written in the lingo of the ear, not the eye. The General Rule on Leading Questions In examination-in-chief or re-examination, the law generally prohibits use of leading questions if objected by the opposing party unless with the leave of court.
Turning over responsibility to the client may seem unnatural, and is always uncomfortable, but it is the best way to accomplish the goals of examination in chief, and the ultimate goal of winning the case for your client. Any information contained in this help guide does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. The non-expert witness must speak from personal knowledge. The examination in Chief must indirectly counter all the rebutting or all probably questions which may crop out of the cross examination. Rule Against Leading Questions A leading question is a question that suggests the desired answer. Think of direct examination as your opportunity to construct persuasive arguments.